User talk:K2cheesynachos

ICCH224

Please complete online student training at https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students You must login and complete the three basic modules. After completion of these modules, we will be able to see that you have edited three pages: Please complete this assignment by the end of today. Special:Contributions/K2cheesynachos at this time shows that you have not finished:

sandbox [1]
be bold [2]
talk page tutorial [3]

You need to be logged in, so that your contributions are recorded under your account. --Taweetham (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Contributions/K2cheesynachos at this time shows that you have finished the online student training at https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students. Thank you for completing the student training, please propose a few topics that you wish to write on Wikipedia. You should read all related articles on Wikipedia and draft your new article(s) or revision to existing article(s) in your sandbox. We are looking forward to seeing

Your proposed topic(s)
Brief outline of your contributions to the article
References for the article and sources of media files (photo/VDO/drawing) to be used in the article.

in your sandbox by Friday 6th October. There will be a few reminders before the deadline. Should you have any questions, please feel free to ask. --Taweetham (talk) 02:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reminder that you have to complete your homework by Friday 6th October to continue with Wikipedia Education Program. It is best that you attempt it before the deadline and we can give you early feedback and directions. --Taweetham (talk) 00:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Topic Aryl is approved. However, you need more details in your proposal. Where will the media/references come from? Please complete this asap. --Taweetham (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curious if the topic Monomer is also a possibility. Will get the media and reference lists done asap too. K2cheesynachos (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have read Talk:Monomer and decided against it. You should completely understand the existing article and its talk page before you can confidently make a substantial change to it. Aryl appears to be easier. --Taweetham (talk) 06:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aryl

Outline and source including the textbook are approved. However, you should use exiting media on Wikimedia commons or create new ones by yourself. Do not take media files from other people. Please start editing the article now. --Taweetham (talk) 06:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the timeline on course page, you are expected to contribute at least 500 bytes by the 13th October. It does not need to be perfect at this time if it is on your sandbox for new article. It has to be somewhat presentable if you are editing the existing article directly. Further optional training on the course page will help you. Feel free to ask if you have any questions. --Taweetham (talk) 09:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge your draft in to the existing article. Be careful with WP:NOT and WP:COPYVIO. We expect to see your work in the article namespace by Friday the 20th of October. --Taweetham (talk) 02:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question - I want to draw a chemical reaction because I couldn't find it anywhere online. Is there any recommended program for doing so? If not, are there any alternative methods I could use to draw these reactions? K2cheesynachos (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There are online tools to help you draw chemical structures e.g. chemdoodle.
There are existing photos on Wikimedia commons where your can modify with graphic software.
The software chemdraw also allow you free trials.

I hope these help. You only need to do this for this article only. All of the three approaches should work fine for this purpose. --Taweetham (talk) 03:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A reviewer has been assigned to you. Please check course page for more information. The reviewer will be your mentor for this assignment from this week onward. --Taweetham (talk) 01:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for your contribution to the article. There are a number of possible improvements:

Please add more references and help format the existing references. You have a large chunk of text without references.
Please plan how would you create media files for your article.
Please read article discussion page and try to address issues discussed there.
Please read general information on the course page to make sure that you satisfy all aspects of our grading criteria.

--Taweetham (talk) 03:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you talk about the difference between benzyl and phenyl group in the article? --Taweetham (talk) 08:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This part has been added under the section "Nomenclature" in the article K2cheesynachos (talk) 15:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/K2cheesynachos and nominate them for deletion. You cannot take copyrighted materials from book to upload into Commons without their permissions. --Taweetham (talk) 07:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the photo from my article, and have nominated the photo for deletion. K2cheesynachos (talk) 08:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your participation in the education program. Here are your final feedbacks:

Please make sure that references are correctly cited, ".[1]" not" [1]."
The rest of the article looks fine to me. In the meantime, you can contribute more by checking your peer's articles. Bear in mind that peer review is also part of the grading criteria.

Good luck! --Athikhun.suw (talk) 03:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Schrödinger kitten for you!

We appreciate physics students working on a chemistry topic.

Taweetham (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two of These People Are Lying (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced. Non-notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Two of These People Are Lying and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Two of These People Are Lying, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K2cheesynachos! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Two of These People Are Lying

Hello, K2cheesynachos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two of These People Are Lying, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Two of These People Are Lying

Hello, K2cheesynachos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Two of These People Are Lying".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]