User talk:K24smith

Hello Kelton, I am introducing myself on user talk for our class on Tuesday. I'm not sure if I am doing this properly, but you can also attempt to introduce introduce yourself on my user talk page.

This is the link to the Women's History Wiki page to help research articles relating to our class content. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women%27s_History

Speedy deletion nomination of Amanda mathew

Hello K24smith,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amanda mathew for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, K24smith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Smith

On request from Adam (Wiki Ed) I have "userfied" this article - moved it into your "user space" at User:K24smith/Amanda Mathew where you can work on it. When it is ready, please don't post it directly, but click the blue "Submit" button, which will send it to WP:Articles for creation, where it will be reviewed by an experienced user, who will either accept it or give you feedback.

The deleting administrator, user Jimfbleak, wrote "non-notable junior officer, one highly partial source" and that sums up the two major problems I see:

Notability: Wikipedia is quite choosy about subjects for articles. The criterion for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary) and Wikipedia:Notability (people). You need to find more sources, independent of the Marines.
Tone: a fundamental policy is Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. We are not here to promote anyone or anything, however deserving. The article comes across as a PR piece for the Marines and for the integration of women (not surprising as the only source is the Marine Corps Times) with terms like "strong will to learn... success... hopefully... " that make it clear you think this is good. You are entitled to think that, and to quote reliable sources that say it, but what you write in Wikipedia's voice should be neutral - no opinions, only facts.

A lesser niggle: "It is said now that.. " would soon attract an ^{[according to whom?]} tag. Check out Wikipedia:Verifiability. There is good general advice in the links in the Welcome message above, which I am sorry you have not been given before, particularly WP:Your first article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]