User talk:K!lluminati

Sources must be posted

I refer to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Module:Yemeni_Civil_War_detailed_map&diff=694324729&oldid=694316024 Where you aint posted the alleged videos in wich you based to make your edits. So please post your sources or next time I will have to revert it. Regards.--HC PUNXKID 16:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisme

The french page is multi sourced by serious sources. Haradh and Nihm are under Hadi control. Your source are not serious. And Jabal Salb is under Hadi control. Stop your pov pushing. Masirah TV are not serious. Please elude of overall changes in Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map & obvious Vandalism without mentioning the source and certain documents (Contains: Web links, news battlefield, analytical articles, video and pic & etc) that's demonstrator accuracy of those claims.

Anyway, continuation annoying edits certainly can to report to administrators for intervene in this issue ends. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

♦♦♦ I editing always by precise analysis sources and news two sides involved in conflict also, observance percentage of possible errors & consider accuracy news. I must say ALMASIRAH TV is one of best agency of Yemen that covers news and based on their reports much of international media TVs quotes. Incidentally, according to latest received news Nihm District is under full control of Houthis and clashes continues around suburb it.

K!lluminati (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Al Massira source is credible and that the Houthis control the district? Also, the card must appear on commons part of the governorate of Sana'a in red (suburban Nihm). So the map of wikimedia commons is false? --Panam2014 (talk) 08:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Panam2014. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia.
As the editor was not making any content changes to the template, discussion on the template's talk page is, in fact, encouraged. Accusing and editor of edit warring on an article or template they have not been editing is a personal attack. Also, don't template the regulars. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring report re Module:Yemeni Civil War detailed map

Please see my post here at the edit war noticeboard. Whilst not breaching the three revert rule, you also have edit warred on the page. Thus I've warned the other user of any further disruption regardless of 3RR and as noted in the link to the edit war board I've suggested you and the other editor take to the module's talk page to reach a consensus or otherwise seek other third party involvement. Should there be an inability to reach consensus then seek as set out in my post dispute resolution or page protection. Report and further edit war on the admin board for consideration. NJA (t/c) 09:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As noted above, i try to work out this dispute on module's talk page to reach a consensus, if was not helpful seek envisaged methods in dispute resolution and finally requests for page protection. i hope be effective your warn on the other side. thank you. K!lluminati (talk) 10:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yemeni Civil War detailed map

Thanks for starting a discussion about it, the map is not serious as Syrian war map & lacks neutral sources, I hope it gets fixed. YemArabSf (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope although it's hard, thanks for comment. K!lluminati (talk)

Sirwah

Yemeni source Saba News Agency(It is a member of the Federation of Arab News Agencies (FANA)[here]) said that the Coalition Planes strike Sirwah district in the province of Marib. A local source told (Saba) that these planes have launched strike in the area of al-Dhiq the district Sirwah and Mount of Hailan and its surroundings.here SvEcHpInXID (talk) 09:55, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SvEcHpInXID Thanks mate, of course i knew that for a long time but the two restorer do not give a chance for revision thus data's map might be incorrect largely.

However efforts about that to be continued. K!lluminati (talk) 01:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Arch dam 12x12 e lime.png

Thanks for uploading File:Arch dam 12x12 e lime.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aden

Sources for Aden.source source SvEcHpInXID (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SvEcHpInXID Thanks fellow man ;) K!lluminati (talk)

About Module-editing

Hello K!lluminati,

first of all, thanks for your work on the Yemeni Civil War Map. I'd actually like to help improving these detailed maps, too. But not only the .svg maps (which I already do) but also the templates, especially the ones where almost no one edits(I'm talking about the templates of the Sudanese and Southern Sudanese Civil War). Now I have one question: How can I get the coordinates of a place I want to add to the map newly? Because especially in these Sudan-map-templates, there are just a very few settlements so far.--Ermanarich (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermanarich: Hi man, thanks to your benevolence. about find settlements coordinates personally i'm using maps of GoogleMaps, Wikimapia and Openstreetmap as combined. the gist is that be fluent in Arabic so that to could find out what you want particular matters like these. i hope be successful in your work.

Cheers! K!lluminati (talk) 18:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast help. You're right, Arabic would actually be important. Luckily, for Sudan I have a very good english source and furthermore there are no arabic letters in the maps. I just have a little problem: I already changed something for the Module:Southern Sudan Civil War detailed map but somehow it doesn't show up on the Template. Do you see any error there?--Ermanarich (talk) 21:32, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermanarich: Everything gonna be alright, just a bit i reintegrated to there. sometimes edits show up with a little delay that have to wait. indeed you made right. K!lluminati (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that's very good. Thank you again for your help.--Ermanarich (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again. Not directly a question but rather a plea. As you know the User Panam2014 is really stressing in the topics around the Yemeni Civil war map. At the moment he reverts all my changes at the .svg map because he claims that Sabanews is a pro Houthi source. I'd ask you to stop using this source, since it creates many problems, or, alternatively prove that it's a neutral source. Also it would be nice if you could find other sources for the things you changed according to Sabanews, because he won't stop to edit-war otherwise. Thank you, Ermanarich (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermanarich: hi alter ago

I apperceive all of them but 2 points. fisrtly Wikipedia Rules not emphasized to neutrality sources! even authenticated: “sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources.” The second, fundamentally this user is a POV-pusher that all his edits confirm this matter & bargaining with him is idle job because he not retreats from his wrong comments. Nevertheless; i agree with your plea but sure conditions not be changed & will be brought another excuses. K!lluminati (talk) 15:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mukalla

Khabar News Aqency: AQAP withdraw from city Mukalla.source source SvEcHpInXID (talk) 18:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SvEcHpInXID: hi man, the news about seizure of Azzan [1] regards to absence of military operation on those areas during last few days maybe not be right & it seems to be more media mischievous especially with the rise of current developments. however must be patient & edit with awareness. K!lluminati (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lahij

pro Hadi source: fierce clashes renewed between the Houthi and Saleh militia in a side and the Resistance and National Army in the other side, in the west side of Lahij governorat especially in Al-Sabiha and Al-Medarba.here SvEcHpInXID (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SvEcHpInXID: Tnx a lot bro

File:3way-orange-brown-green.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:3way-orange-brown-green.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please update Yemen civil war map

Hello. Can you please update the Yemen civil war map? Zinjibar, Ja'ar and 'Azzan (it's the large grey dot near Habban) are now under Yemen government's control. Please show them under government control. You can use Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map as reference for their locations. Newsboy39 (talk) 08:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

101 mechanized brigade

http://www.criticalthreats.org/gulf-aden-security-review/gulf-aden-security-review-october-17-2016 Hi could you locate it ? --Panam2014 (talk) 18:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pannam2014 and Panam2014: couldn't to find it on the map. now i search again if it's position was found, apply it on template map. K!lluminati (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the border. Have you got a template du represent it. Also, there are two Boqa in Yemen ? --Panam2014 (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: this brigade (101 mechanized brigade) located inside of Buga area/town but it's exact position is unclear & seems conflict is still on going there because hadi forces beseiged Houthi troops in 101 brigade & main bazaar in Buga is in dominance of Houthis. in Sa'dah Governorate there is one Buga but the dictates are different (Buga, Boqe'e, Boga, ...) K!lluminati (talk) 13:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So we can not use the symbol of encirclement or siege because we not know it location? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: That's right. cant do something until to getting more detail K!lluminati (talk) 17:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[2]. Hi man. It is located in Kitaf. Could you locate it ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arhab

Hi I suggest you to discuss before edit the module. The source said that the district has been contested and the icon "80x80-red-lime-anim.gif" said that there are a mixed control in the region, and is used if a camp controls 1/5 of the district, 1/3, 1/2 or even 2/3 or 3/4. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:51, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Or we should relocate Arhab district ? Arhab is not a city and the idem doesn't represent a city or a center but the entire Arhab district. What do you think ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Hello.

Basically source didn't say of seize or contest in Arhab. look again to the source text: “Hadi government and popular resistance forces seized al Houthi-Saleh territory in Arhab area, Nihm district, northeast of Sana’a city” means area that located between Arhab & Nihm district & then continued for more transparency: “Hadi government forces seized Mount Babin (and Mount Yam)”

Well! that's bench. Hadi forces only have captured babin & yam mounts not more.

But in "Arhab" case should say Arhab is one of Sana'a districts and has a center like them. attention to pictures 1, 2 & 3. Hindwan as center of Arhab which is base of Houthi/Saleh forces. in fiq.3 shown probable place of Babin mount. it should be noted that Arhab positioned as a city in map nor as a symbol of the district. just like all template civil war maps. K!lluminati (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I did not read well. And if not, in Yemen, there is no city named Arhab but on the map the icon of Arhab represents the city located in the center of the district? Do you know his name? Friendly. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Pannam2014 and Panam2014: hi, no problem. exactly, in Sana'a governorate there isn't any city namely «Arhab» & only a one district with this title be at there.

but this news “http://www.criticalthreats.org/gulf-aden-security-review/gulf-aden-security-review-december-5-2016” invoked to 3 links (1), (2) & (3).

About “Alab & Baqim” according to source cited, hence: [link] should to pointed out in source text said: “Hadi & Southern forces seized Alab border crossing & advanced in Baqim district and involved with Houthi forces in Mandabe mountains.” in source mentioned no thing about seizure of Baqim city and hadi forces away KMs from center of Baqim. like "Arhab" matter, issue outlined as generally & edit undone accurately.

About “Buqa” due to source detailes. basically no refer to Buqa city and only said conflicts countinue in axis of Buqa front. specifically from 25 November onward not seen any movement & mobility in Buqa front and the situation is the same as previous state without slightest change.

About “Midi” Criticalthreats said: “Al Houthi-Saleh forces retreated from the contested battlefront of Midi city.” pay attension to “battlefront” word and no means to whole city. per accord to [link] spoken: “a group of 90 Houthi forces (not all of them) retreated from Midi” that doesn't mean to liberation of “Midi” because large number of Houthi forces present at there still.

Important: I want to point out you as sincere and friendly. first, EN-lanqueges sources (like criticalthreats.org) about exact following up & scrutiny of developments trend (especially for Yemen) not so authoritative & credible because they cited from Arabic local sources & reflect issues as knock general or sweeping generalizations while events occur partially and minor... (understand what i mean?). second, accurate local sources are in arabic and in order to realize news text you forced to be fluent in Arabic lanquege. accordingly you must knowing arabic or otherwise for prevention of doing wrong edit, consult & getting guidance from aware person before.

Anyway, your edit in module must be reclaim. K!lluminati (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. So, you say that the source named "globalthreat" translates dispatches into Arabic but it commits translation errors. So I let you correct my mistakes and I trust you in good faith. No problem for me. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I dont say they committed wrong in translation but the point is that they generalize & extend issues and advances in quote of News. however, these matters are journalism rules and headline press techniques in fact.

Thanks for having trust to me. K!lluminati (talk) 12:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mokha Port

Hi The port was captured by Hadi forces. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Hello mate

The port or city not fallen by hadi troops. currently vast majority of the city districts & entire of port are in hands of houthis and only in some areas exist conflict. [3], [4] & [5] (hours ago)

K!lluminati (talk) 21:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Anchor pictogram blue.png

The file File:Anchor pictogram blue.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon Kolbert: Hello.

The file raised in Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map, if you look at the symbol of Balhaf Port carefully it's visible.

So seems proposed deletion charge due to orphaned or foreseeable using is not correct.

Regards. K!lluminati (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@K!LLuminati: The file being used is "Anchor pictogram blue.svg", it seems as if the PNG file has been superseded. Cheers, Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:36, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon Kolbert: Now, however, what to do to fix that ? K!lluminati (talk) 23:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to fix anything because there is no problem. SVG files are generally superior to PNG files, so it makes sense the new file is being used in place of the PNG. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. thank. K!lluminati (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Sana'a (2017)

Hi Have you got sources about the timeline of the battle ? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, resources exist but are in Arabic lanq

yemeni publisher resources further belonged to political parties as almotamar (Saleh Party), Houthis and Hadi sites outlets, Saudi coalations or Emirates medias. of course some of sites covers all sides reports like [6] and [7]

Although all of them are in Arabic language. K!lluminati (talk) 15:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem if it is in arabic langage. I have Google Translator. But what is the best website for having last developements ? --Panam2014 (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for your support. HC PUNXKID 13:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HCPUNXKID:

No problem man. thanks for your greasy & sweet gift too.😉❤️ K!lluminati (talk) 12:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Arch dam 12x12 e lime.png

The file File:Arch dam 12x12 e lime.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not sure how this image is useful.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]