User talk:Ermanarich

Zurg language

Hi. Citation please for your claim that there is no language material? — kwami (talk) 20:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

https://orientalberber.wordpress.com/page/2/ This is not a citation, but a page which includes almost all international known data about eastern Berber languages, and they doesn't even mention the language Zurg. But of course I can't prove if there is maybe somewhere a hidden script of Zurg. That's the reason why I wrote no known. If that isn't exact enough for Wikipedia, I'm very sorry(I'm new; at least, I already saw very many of much worse Wikipedia page, for example one in german, where they wrote that the Getae were the same tribe as the Gothi/Gutones). To this Zurg language; I'm not even sure if this language really existed. In the internet, there is absolutely no information safe for this one mentioning in my source and the Eastern Berber Languages map on Wikimedia. But that's already far too much inside propabilities...--Ermanarich (talk) 21:43, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Yemen and other things

I changed the northwest port of Midi, that is captured by Hadi loyalists. Don't worry, i removed the new version, and i posted the previous one, but i will changed again when i do beater graphic map work--Tiseptiko (talk) 4:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Ermanarich. As you said, pope Francis is more progressive than the others, but is still the pope, the leader of Catholic Christians. Of curse is not so bad, like the of Kirill of Moscow. the truth is that i forgotten to put Kirill in his place,(you see i consider to remove the Francis from my list, because of is statement about LGBT right and his progressive ideas), a think that i will do right now, because you remember my the popes. About the maps now. Thank for you will to improve Wikipedia, but for now, the map is currently correct. If you see that something is changed in the template of the detailed map, and is not updated to the colored map, you have to go to the map's file on Wikipedia commons, you will download the file, and if you are good graphic designer in you PC, you will color the changed territories and the city balls in their related colors, and you then go to the maps file, and select 'View in Commons'. Then go to the files history and update the map. If you don't want to do it (if you are not good designer or you boring) send my a message and i will update it. If you see on the news that something is changed on the territorials of Yemen, and is not changed on the detailed map, send my a message again, and the map will updated. Sorry about the lot of writing. see ya.--Tiseptiko (talk) 10:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Well, about the anarchism : Yes you have right, maybe this idea will never work, but, if we all say that the anarchism will never by established, then, of curse will never work. I' personally believe that in some years, in the future (maybe in 100 or 1.000 years) the anarchism will have established in the most of the planet. This time, the 100-1.000 years, is the natural way, the evolution of humans as spices, because the newest generations are more intelligent that the previous one. Think. If the most are intelligent and logical, why the religions will exist? or the nations? some ideas that they are none logical in their bases. Well with this way, many millions of people will die and suffer from poverty and meaningless wars. Its and another way, the Holy war of the anarchists. The Propaganda of the deed(if you don't know this ideology, see it in Wikipedia). With this way, the anarchist ideas will established faster in the ground and in the minds of the people, but again, many will die, but not most of them innocence. But the truth is that the most anarchists today, don't believe that this is the faster way to achieve our ideas in the ground. I', personally believe it. About the map, send my the name of he file to check about it. Thanks for reading, and send my again message if you want to ask something, either for the politics or the Wikipedia. --Tiseptiko (talk) 21:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Ermanarich, you have right to some of you writings. Its reality that in some countries the Right-wing political parties are taking advance, and the educated people, generally have less children than the not educated, but the Left have done some great steps also. For example: In Greece, the long year ruling Right wing and center-wing (New Democracy and PASOK) parties have defeated in three elections in only one year in 2015, because the Left wing SIRYZA broke them. In Spain, the also left wing party is taking force. Even in the meddle east, the YPG, PKK, and other left wing militias have advanced (but also the Jihadist are advanced). In US is difficult to verify what wing takes advantage because the both of them are in their good times. You have the Tramp from the one side, and Sanders from the other side(the tramp is very right, and sanders is very left), so is 50/50. In the other side the Pope have made some good statements about the gay rights. And because in this discussion are many examples, i believe that the right is wining, but with little difference with the left, so as i said and previously, maybe the right wins, i don't know, but if you want my opinion, like we defeated the most kings and monarchs, like this we well defeat the capitalists and their leaders. About the nations now. Yes, is some nice hearing about the difference of the people, but this difference it follows by conflict. Remember, the religions is also a part of this difference. Many have died because of racism like in he WW2 and the national difference. Yes, maybe wee have to maintain some differences between us, but very little of cultural impact, in my opinion of curse. Its not some patriotic think put i also like the different cultures, but as i said the truth is that different cultures bring conflict, and the best way to defeat an idea is from its source(the racism have its source in the nations, and the homophobia and sexism in the religion). Anyway if you disagree with me is fine, and send an answer if you want because i really like our political discussion. For the map, you have right. I created a new file in commons with your map, and i replaced in the Yemen war article, because i don't fully understand why the map is not uploaded as a new version for the previous one. See it if you want. --Tiseptiko (talk) 1:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear Ermanarich, i have read your message just now, but a will fully answer in some couple of hours because i have something to do.--Tiseptiko (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Now that i done my previous works, i will answer to your answer. First is not the Nazi golden down(chrysi avgi) parthner of siryza. Is the Independent Greeks, that they are as party simple right, and not far right, as golden down. This is important because is not the same to be right, and far right. As for the SYRIZA government future, you have right, maybe not survive because of many things including the crisis. And if they defeat in the next elections,(thing that i not believe because they have already win 3 times in a year) they have already have done radical changes, as the Recognition of same-sex unions in Greece, and the benefits for pour people on free food, house, and electricity. As for Spain and PYD/YPG i agree with you. But in the PKK anwser i believe that you are not absolute(if i understand the meanings of you writings about PKK, because you can see i don't fully understand 100 per send the English language ) right, because the PKK ideology, strategy and tactics are already adopted by large groups and organizations like the similar YPG, one of the main forces in the Syrian war. As for Ertogan, and Sanders, we again agree. For the Republicans, they are the same idiots for me, with some of them to be, limitless from he others more good persons. Now for the Religion: I want now please consider well before you answer in this question. You say that the science have not yet proved the non-existence of god, and god have a place at least on theory. With this logic of yours, that is pretty common, i will answer to you. The science have ever proved that the spiderman, batman, Hercules, and all this mythological creatures are not existing? The answer is simple. How a a man can prove a thing that is not existing? They cannot prove the existence of god, because the god is not simple existing, like the batman and spiderman. all human imagination creations(this is my sceptic. If you disagree is fine). However, i don't disagree with you in your writings about the libertarian way, that if someone beliefs and he don't propagandize his belief, its okay. If i miss something tell it to me, and send my message again if you want. Bay the way, i think that you are a think of Libertarian socialist. If i have right tell it to me in your next message--Tiseptiko (talk) 17:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

About PKK, your theory is very possible, and if this decision made by PKK, will of course help them as a political party, because of the removal of the terrorist stamp. As for the religion, your theory is right about the aware, and maybe the spiderman created the universe, But i personally prefer to believe the most realistic,(when i say realistic, i mean my logic and optic of creation of the universe ) model. However, its possible that the physics are not correct, and maybe all played by actors, and all this story is a big lie. I understand your agnostic opinions, i myself was agnostic to, wen i was very young, (in my first teenage years), and i believe that is good to aware, because in good to think all the time, you now staff like questions of existence. But after a lot of thinking trough the years, i ended in the opinion that the world created by a simple coincidence. I don't tell that your theory is not correct, i only say my own opinion of the world. As i say previously, i like our discussion, and i see that you have many knowledge. I want to do some personal questions, only for curiosity, how older you are, and if you are living in Europe. And don't forget to tell my about Rojava. As for Yemeni think, when i go to the link, it says my that page does not exist. check it if you want.See ya.--Tiseptiko (talk) 15:41, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ermanarich, i will search more in the Yemeni link, and for the Rojava thing and i probably send you message at the night(8-9 at the night, in some 7 hours)because i have some work to do See ya --Tiseptiko (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Now about the universe, well, you have right. We, the humans, we have not been able to understand how the time runs in utter space, and what was before the big bank, but i briefly believe that in sometime, if we are lucky, before you and my die, our scientist will be able to reveal some of the universe secrets that bother us from were we was children. For now , wee cannot understand how the universe begin, but wee can make theorems, and that is the difference of humans and animals. Wee wonder, and that wonder lead as to exploration. I, from the common physics that i know, i believe that before big bank, was only Dark energy, all the time, from the beginning. Now how the dark energy have created, i really don't know, and i haven't really thinking ever for much time thinking about it. Now for the Rojava. I read the social contract in Wikipedia, and you have right. I socialist state that is not in big force, and not really matters in global economy, will be very poor, or will be fall, and of course if its poor, its cannot send rockets and astronauts in the outer space(i also like to see the space exploration by the humans). This is the bad think of individual socialistic states. To success, they have to be a force like soviet union. And soviet union survived for 70 years, but with mass executions and killings, and at the end was a fascist state. So these are the problems of social states, and i believe wee will analyze them in the past days, because is really a discussion that it needs a whole book to describe how this system will succeed or fall. As for me. I'm an Albanian immigrant in Greece, and i am living in a worker class family. I'm 17, and i am not really good student in school, because, after i finished, i want to go to an artist school(university or something like that), because i want to work in comics or something like that. I already work on my own comics and they are pretty good. I also like history and politics (i don't reading in school, because in Greece if you want to go for philosophy or history, you have to learn ancient Greek, Latin and other thinks that i believe that they are not useful to me). After all, i love to create art more that to pay attention in class to learn history and philosophy in the school. If i want to read something, i will read it in Wikipedia. That for me , and as for the Yemeni thing ill wrote for this tomorrow. See ya --Tiseptiko (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ermanarich. About the economy. you have right about to socialize the economy. But to be just, maybe in Scandinavian countries the governments are leftist, but the economy is still capitalistic(i don't know very good how the Scandinavian economy is works, but as i know is not clearly socialistic) wits is means that are still the bosses and still the workers, wealthy and pours, homeless and millionaires and all the other bad thinks of capitalism. But of course i prefer the economy of Scandinavia besides the economy of most of European states and the still 'socialist'(they using the socialism as a stamp only) states, like China and Vietnam. About the Soviets now. Of course as you see i don't like the soviets, but we have to accept, that the system before the soviet, the Russian empire, was a ruthless, and more evil than soviets. Wat i mean is that my parents lived during Albanian communism, wits is only survived like the other little Communist states because of the soviets, and they said, like all the other Albanians that lived the system i know, that they liked more from the current situation in Greece and also in Albania. Their examples are that during communism, you was not rich, but not pour also. You use to have work, free house(but one), and according to them no one was homeless and without food or electricity, like many families in the current Albania and Greece. I personally don't like the communist system of Albania, because of its non free of speech, dictatorships, and other thinks that i believe you know. Think about it. You prefer to be homeless in the democracy, or to have a home and work in the communism. To die in democracy, or to live in red dictatorship. Maybe for as that we are educated its pictured in our minds bad because of the dictators, but for the very pour ones, the mostly uneducated they prefer to live in a red dictatorship, than to die in democracy. Maybe and you and me also prefer the Communism if we have not jobs and families and kids to feed in the future. What i mean is that i understand the pour people that want the communism back in world, because for the previous examples. I also don't like the Communist Party of Greece, because they have idols like Stalin. About the without money theory, i 100 per sent agree with that as an anarchist, but as you said is mot very realistic. I still believe as i said before that i socialist state, a really socialist, good state, cannot survive alone, because the capitalist states (wits they are the most of the world)will not support this state. I hope that rojava to survive as a socialist state, but i really believe that will turned to capitalism in the past of the years. As for the nations again, you have right, but i don't believe that the racism will never disappear until the nations fall. You see, the most of our disagreements is how will achieve the defeat of the bad thinks of our current society, and what strategy we have to use. Now for the Yemeni think. Another example of the conflict between the nations differences. Its clearly that the conflict will continued in Yemen, after the defeat of the main factions, either is AQAP or Houthi or Hadi that will wins. I like to be journalist too, but as you said about the art, me too i don't believe that i can earn my money be this, because I'm not so skillful as i journalist, than an artist. I hope for you to succeed as a journalist, or the another works maybe you do. Send you opinions about my writings about economy, and the pour people skeptic. See Ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

So, what is your answer? If you have some work to do, its okay, i will wait. See Ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ermanarich, i just read you message, but because in Greece the time is 12 at the night, and i have job tomorrow morning, i will answer you tomorrow. See Ya and good sleep--Tiseptiko (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ermanarich.Is the Scandinavian, you have right, and i hope that maybe their system go on in the rest of Europe. About the socialist states, its real that they make this word to look bad on people eyes. Now about the money removal. When my and the other anarchists will say to remove the money, wee also mean and the other thinks that can used as money. I will tale you what anarchist economical system, i believe that is better, the Collectivist anarchism economy.(read it and tell my you opinion.) In summary, it works without money and other thinks can used for money. It simple works with the cooperation and the good will of the humans. A little text of the Wikipedia article 'For the collectivization of the means of production, it was originally envisaged that workers will revolt and forcibly collectivize the means of production. Once collectivization takes place, money would be abolished to be replaced with labour notes and workers' salaries would be determined, in democratic organizations of voluntary membership, based on job difficulty and the amount of time they contributed to production. These salaries would be used to purchase goods in a communal market. This contrasts with anarcho-communism where wages would be abolished, and where individuals would take freely from a storehouse of goods "to each according to his need.' Of course is very difficult this system to be in work, bu i want to have a good faith for the next generations in the future as i said in my first messages. About Rojava. They work beyond the capitalist model or the Scandinavia model. They work under democratic confederalism, a system that is like socialism, but with ownership, and is a bit not so radical as socialism and communism. About the nations, its fine for not to be removed, if the successfully live without a bit of racism. But i don't really believe that this can stand on(nations, without national conflict). As that you said about places and cities is right. It's a matter of contact. About the refugee crisis now. We will talk about this and in other talks, bout i will tell you that i believe that is a problem, because, where we can found food and jobs for us and for them? Wee already are too much peoples in Europe. Of course wee have to take them in our countries and welcomed because their have war, And if they are only immigrants for economical reasons, then again we have to accept them, because also the economical reasons are very important reasons(am immigrant my self, and i know that is not easy) for them to go out of their homes. Now about the music. You have tell my what music you hear and i will recommend you, but the truth is that i have a year and more to hear music for real(i mostly now hear music not for ideology, but only for their good hearing). As for me i mostly hear Hip Hop, punk, rock and also some classics like Michel Jackson, but i also maybe hear and something else over the times. So tell my what music you hear, or you want to hear , and i will tell you who i believe that are good as musicians. If you want ideological music, i can tell you also(I was big fan of music before some time, and i know many bands and musicians). Send my you opinions about Europe migrant crisis, the anarchist economical system, and anything else that you want to discus.--Tiseptiko (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Ermanarich my friend, i have just read you message but i will answer you tomorrow, because here is too late(if is in Germany 10, here is 12). School tomorrow for me you see, and i can't do any absences because i already have too many(130 hours), so i have to awake early tomorrow. See Ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 23:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Ermanarich. About the refugees i put it in the rong way the previous time. When i said that wee have no to feed them, i was mean that wee have not enough jobs about them unfortunately. Especial in Greece, the 1/4 of the population, is already unemployed. Now my friend, i am sadly that i said but the economical crisis in Greece will not disappear until the rest of the 20 years. The situation here is very bad. Of course the refuges are good welcomed. As if i have direct contact, i have. My home is 10 minutes with walk from the center of Athens, so i see them very usually, and they living in very bad condition of life. About the right wing and Turkey problems, i agree with you. About the music. I have never hear about the anti-Flag band, bout i will hear some songs, to see that they got. Now about the political bands that i know, one of them is the Chaos UK, Greek punks, the omixlh band, from Hip Hop Javaspa (He sing in Greek, so unfortunately you cannot understand what he said). From artistic side, i was hear the Michel Jackson, the kasabian, the Eazy-E(when i was very young) NOTORIOUS B.I.G, and some times just for his funny songs, eminem. Now i just hear mostly nothing. I prefer to research and to create my comics(i plan, if i found sometime a bugged, think unusual because i don't have a home or a car of my own, either my family, to create a comic company like Marvel and DC, because i already have my own universe of characters). But most possibly , i will become a worker like my father, and his father before his own father and goes on. Not very opportunities in capitalism for the pour ones you see. That unfairness leaded my to the left, and then eventually in anarchism. About the peoples mind i agree with you ,and a i said previously, its to hard to achieve this. About anarchism i am very optimistic, because i chose to follow this movement, just like you, on the nations. :) Send my you opinions about that, and i will wait. See ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem brother. See you tomorow then.--Tiseptiko (talk) 24:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey my friend, sorry for my late answer, but i was in a really trouble day. Well now about the refuges, maybe you have right, maybe not, will see the future, and i hope that you have right, so for everyone to live a good life, either if s a Syrian or a native of Europe. About the refugee deals, i will answer about it tomorrow. About the comics. I will be opened to you, my friend. My comics characters are fully complete, (150 around of them), and its set up in a universe just like Marvels or Dark horse. But they are more realistic than spider-man and superman. Well about the nationalism. I believe that you are not nationalist, not at all. But is some years, maybe you change you mind, and begin change in idea of the nations(to be against the nations). But even if you not change, this is not a problem, because the disease of racism, is already healed in you mind. Send my you opinions about that bro, oh and something else. What is you opinion about Che Guevara? See Ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 1:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps you working. Its OK, See Ya :)--Tiseptiko (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey my friend, how the things doing? I hope good for you, because i was in really trouble days. About my answer, will come in 22:00-23:00 at the night,(in Germany, 21:00-22:00) or earlier, because i want to check more about the rise of right in Europe and to give you a complete answer, plus, i am in big temper to paint my comic. :)--Tiseptiko (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

The answer will come tomorrow, because my older brother needs a help from my and i have not time to fully answer. I hope that you don't mind. See You my friend, and good night.--Tiseptiko (talk) 21:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey my friend. About the refugee deals, i believe that if we split them around the Europe, maybe the problem is solved. About the deals, well, Turkey its plays a dirty game, and its haves the Europe in its hands(Europe will paid them much more than Turkey needs for the refuges). Well, we will see what will happen. About the nations, i believe that if even you not change, its not a problem, because the disease of racism is removed from you head. Now about Guevara: Obviously, you and the most of the people, don't know what Guevara really was. Yes hi was brutal, but is not only this. He was probably homophobic(See LGBT rights in Cuba) and hi and Castro have exiled many anarchists(Anarchism in Cuba). Also, if you want read his book, he said that the Stalin is the perfect idol for a revolutionary to follow. [read it]. You can find these things and in another sources, and not only in Wikipedia or anarchist library. You know, when i was communist, before some 3-4 years i was pretty like Che Guevara, but when i learn the truth... Anyway, about the German right. What the fuck man? So many right people in Germany? And i was considered the Greece a right country, because only 2 left parties are in Greece. I fell your angry. I was and i am angry when i hear the right ideals people to talk....There are talking like stupids, and they are very bad. I was talking with another German kid, and hi is telling my that Germany is very authoritarian state. Its so worse out there ? Here in Greece we have even school occupations. Send my your opinion when you want my friend. Oh and about the comics. Yes most of the, are with political or philosophical meaning. See Ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Good luck with your examine :)--Tiseptiko (talk) 22:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey my friend. Sorry for my late answer, but i wasn't mostly in my home these days. Well about the erdogan(about his dictatorship) you have right, and for the Guevara you have right also. Wee have to see the things from both sides of the coin. About the right parties in Europe, maybe you have right, but they are decreased in much of European states. I mean in Greece, or in Spain, or in Italy, the left parties are strongest than before. About the school, well, you are lucky :) The other kid i have tell you, hi hates that. Oh and something else. What i your opinion about the Chechen war? see you my friend :)--Tiseptiko (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem. See you my friend.--Tiseptiko (talk) 13:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey again ermanarich. How the things doing? well i hope. About the right in Europe, you have right. The northern countries are indeed most right-Party than the southern. About the kid that hates school, i mean that hi hates the very authoritarian school stile in Germany. Here in Greece, we even do occupations in the public schools. About the Chechen war, i mean the first one of 1990s. See you--Tiseptiko (talk) 22:35, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

I can't answer today. I will answer tomorrow. See Ya--Tiseptiko (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

My friend, i agree 100 per sent with you about the Chechen war. Yes, Ramzan is a very little bastard men, so also the Putin(fucking dictators), and the Islamism extremism in Chechnya. Very bad things happen during the Chechen war, as you said people are missing, killed raped and abducted. You know, you have to see the Doku Umarov interview, before hi becomes a Jihadist, when was still moderate, and see what he tells about Ramzan and Kadyrovs. See the video[1]. Well tell me you opinion about that an see you. :)--Tiseptiko (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2016

Hey my friend. The answer will come tomorrow.--Tiseptiko (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2016

Hey ermanarich. Well about Turkey, i believe that the regime there, will not be changed, because of very popular support of the Erdogan and his government. But some regional changes i believe that will take place, and one of them will be a very big insurgency in the southeast Turkey, there that the majority of population are Kurdish. Of curse the PKK or similar militias will play a big role, but wee will wait and we will see. About ISIL, i believe that their future is shortly, and they will not be a major player in the Turkish political future. By the way, you believe that the coalition airstrikes on ISIL and Qaeda, are strategically correct, and moral fair?--Tiseptiko (talk) 12:17, 1 April 2016

The answer comes tomorrow.--Tiseptiko (talk) 12:17, 1 April 2016

Sorry for my lat answer, but i as not in my PC these days. :| Well ,how the things doing? About the Turkish problem, wee agree, and about Sanders, well, he maybe help PKK if they cease their terrorist activity. About the airstrikes, believe that will be better, if US attacked the Qaeda and ISIL with boots, and defeat them without killing most civilians lives. You see, when US hits AQAP, the families of the dead civilians, are mostly join the Qaeda, or sympathies them. About the other Kurdish, i will search about that, and i will see what is about them. For the southern movement, they are separatists, they want their Independence from Yemen, and they want to rebuild their previous, Southern Yemen state. Oh and about the Panama papers, what is your opinion? See You my friend, and be well :D --Tiseptiko (talk) 17:41, 5 April 2016

Hello my friend. How about you? Good i hope. About the US wars, well, and in one way, and in another, it seems that the US have lost the war since the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. They have not really destroyed any organization since the war on terror, so, the terrorists have the upper hand. About the Panama leak, well, i agree in very parts with you. See you my friend. --Tiseptiko (talk) 22:41, 14 April 2016

Truth

Hi. Please read there. K!lluminati is a pov pusher. He had also problem with bluehypercane and another user. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Qaryat Kharabat Jabr

Qaryat Kharabat Jabr it's the other name for village Kharabalook here which is under conrol ISF.source So when I add Kharaba I just did not notice that on map has already been village Qaryat Kharabat Jabr and later I removed one of them. SvEcHpInXID (talk) 12:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of armed groups in the Iraqi Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shabak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

About Sheikh Maqsood

Hi, it seems like you understand german. If you don't, I'm sorry and I'll rewrite the text below in english. ;) Ich konnte diese Meldungen über den Rückzug der SDF vor ein paar Tagen auch überhaupt nicht verstehen, die erschienen mir ziemlich unrealistisch und irrational. Andererseits sind bei AMN ja eher selten Falschmeldungen dabei, jedenfalls rief ich dann den Artikel für Sheikh Maqsood hier bei Wikipedia auf und wollte ihn auch mal allgemein ergänzen (ist eben ein Stub), gleichzeitig aber auch diese obskure Neuigkeit verarbeiten. ;) Jedenfalls habe ich danach überhaupt nichts mehr über den Vorfall gelesen, scheint also wirklich eine falsche Information gewesen zu sein und daher kann sie auch vorerst wirklich von Wikipedia gelöscht werden. --Flying Desert Snow Leopard (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Ja, ich hatte mit Tiseptiko eine lange Diskussion geführt, können wir auch gerne machen. :) Den Artikel über Sheik Maqsood kann ich derzeit leider nicht effektiv bearbeiten, da ich in den nächsten Tagen ein sehr begrenztes Datenvolumen habe, effektives Recherchieren und Suchen von Quellen wäre da hinderlich. :| Bei AMN gab es heute wieder so einen merkwürdigen Artikel (https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/southfront-rebel-forces-gain-ground-sheikh-maqsoud-district-aleppo/) über das Thema. Aber ein Rückzug der SDF würde wirklich keinen Sinn ergeben, dann müsste schließlich die SAA (oder die Snackbars, das wäre aber total absurd) das Gebiet übernehmen und die dortigen SDF-Truppen müssten nach Afrin eskortiert werden. Logisch wäre höchstens, das sich die SDF temporär in den von der SAA kontrollierten Teil von Aleppo zur Reorganisation aufhalten würde. --Flying Desert Snow Leopard (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok. :) --Flying Desert Snow Leopard (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Und ich dachte schon du hättest mich vergessen. :D Am besten schreibst du deine E-Mail-Addresse hier rein wenn du kein Problem damit hast (und löschst sie dann wieder), wenn du kein Problem damit hast dass sie weiter in der Versionsgeschichte auffindbar ist. Ansonsten müssten wir für das Austauschen der E-Mail-Addressen eine Trash-Mail benutzen. --Flying Desert Snow Leopard (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Reminder

Weren't you going to change Shamer village to ISIS-held on the Rif Aleppo SVG map? Just a reminder. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 02:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for that. The reason I didn't change it was the unclear situation, since Mehmedsons brought a (maybe not reliable) source which contradicted the words you wrote. Also, I simply didn't find the time to do it. But if you are sure that it's controlled by the IS, I can do it today.

Another thing, since I saw what you wrote when you edited something on the Taliban insurgency detailed map module: There are some regional sources in english, which bring us almost daily reports about clashes inside Afghanistan. Some of these sources are: http://www.khaama.com/ http://www.afghanistannews.net/ and http://www.pajhwok.com/en/

The reason why nobody edits there, is, that a User called Deonis 2012 was very active at the Modules for many civil war maps, not only for Syria and Iraq but also for Libya, Yemen and Afghanistan. The problem is, that he was blocked some years ago (his english isn't really good and as far I know he war copying content into articles and POV-pushing in favour of Assad). After that, he tried to evade this block with a real army of sockpuppets. The sockpuppets I directly came across weren't POV-pushing anymore and only editing at maps, which means that he can't simply copy text and thus break the rules of Wikipedia. Also, his edits were well-sourced and extremely helpful to keep the civil wars that aren't that much in the view of the media and the Wikipedia-users actualised.

After being trapped another time, he stopped trying to evade the block. Along with that, the Modules of the Libyan, Yemeni and Afghani civil war started becoming orphaned and are now being rarely actualised, missing important changes on the battlefield. I'm aware that evading a block is very problematic, but it's also a fact, that although he broke the rules of Wikipedia in the past, he is not harming Wikipedia, in contrary, he is very helpful. I already asked some administrators to end the block, but they didn't react.

I'd ask you to help me getting him unblocked again. Maybe there is a reaction then...--Ermanarich (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Please update Libyan civil war map

Hello I'll like to request you to update the Libyan Civil War map. GNA forces had already taken over all of area around Sirte. See Template:Libyan Civil War detailed map for reference. Please show area all around Sirte under GNA control.Thank you. Newsboy39 (talk) 12:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Yep. I didn't follow the war for a time, because nothing spectacular new happened. Thanks for the information.

By the way, because I saw you requesting some map actualisations the last time: Are you interested in learning how to edit a scalable vector graphics (svg) map? If so, I could tell you about some basics.--Ermanarich (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

I tried to learn but it was difficult for me. Another time for me. Maybe. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 03:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Pbfreespace3 he's talking about me, not you. Alright Ermanarich, I will like to learn to some basics of editing svg maps. Newsboy39 (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Fine. I'll do it the next days. Today I can't yet, I'm busy with other things. But I'll find enough time for the Yemen map.--Ermanarich (talk) 20:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Please update Yemen civil war map

Hello again. Can you please update the Yemen civil war map? Zinjibar, Ja'ar and 'Azzan (it's the large grey dot near Habban) are now under Yemen government's control. Please show them under government control. You can use Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map as reference for their locations. Newsboy39 (talk) 07:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok. I'll do it in the next hours.--Ermanarich (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Please update Libyan Civil war map regarding Benghazi Shura Council territory control

Hello again. There's another inaccuracy in the Libyan Civil War map. In the map there is no territory under Shura Council of Benghazi's control. However the Benghazi Defense/Defend Benghazi Brigades, a militia loyal to the council and have captured several towns below Qaminis. You can see their control area in this source: http://www.libyanexpress.com/benghazi-defense-brigades-advance-toward-benghazi/

Please be aware it doesn't represent the full territory though. Please update the map. Thank you. Newsboy39 (talk) 07:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

That's somehow difficult, because the source says explicitly, that it's only a claim by the Islamist's media outlet...--Ermanarich (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

One more thing: In the Syrian Civil War map module, you removed Îlan. You said, because it's doubled. But that's not the case. Now, there isn't a Îlan on the map anymore.--Ermanarich (talk) 20:44, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

About your assertion that the source I gave says explicitily that it's a claim by Islamists' media outlet. In actual, the source only said "The media wing said the Benghazi Defense Brigades controlled this morning and yesterday many areas western Benghazi such as Al-Magroon and others". The claim by the Islamists' media wing was only about their latest advance in 2 days.

In the 4th paragraph, it is actually the source itself talking about the advance of Benghazi Defence Brigades "The Benghazi Defense Brigades have taken control of many towns and districts to the west of Benghazi and are now advancing to reach more areas such as Slooq, which is located some 40 km west of Benghazi." Slooq is located east of Qaminis. So what I said to you earlier was right. Now that I've cleared all the doubts, can you please correct it now? Newsboy39 (talk) 04:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

I fixed the issue you raised about Ilan. I thought it was mentioned twice but it didn't turn out to be the case. Newsboy39 (talk) 08:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

There are two problems about this... The first is, that the towns and villages controlled by it are not explicitly mentioned. Second problem is, that I usually only copy from the Template, since sourced changes are to be made there or alternatively edit the Benghazi conflict detailed map. But the area we are talking about is outside of this map.

Ilan had two mentions when you searched after it, because Ilan also occurs in Yilanli.

And another tip: Don't act too aggressive the next time and respect the editing rules! I'm sure that you only want to help and I know that you make good edits, but there are already some persons, which are quite angry about you. I'd recommend to try to deescalate the both conflicts. Regards, Ermanarich (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Don't blame me for something that others started and then refuse to see their fault. I do not see how pointing out others' mistakes is agressiveness. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes, but in general it's better to be friendly and talk before starting an unnecessary dispute.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

I tried to be friendly. You know how others responded? One claimed I was trying to start an edit war and refused to start a discussion when I told him to, telling me to start it first. And another one started blaming me of editing based on POV, being a sock, being a duplicate even though I only informed him about a rule. That's what I got for being friendly. Attitudes, accusations, harassment and having my time wasted. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Well, that's somehow understandable then. However, thanks for your edits here and that you want to help improving Wikipedia. And in future, don't let others provoke you, stay calm and talk.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll keep in mind whatever you said. And thanks for all your help. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

And what shall I do about the Benghazi Shura-Mujahedeen?--Ermanarich (talk) 17:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

I agree with what you said about it, that's why I never mentioned it afterwards. Maybe there's a workaround, how about we represent the towns shown under Benghazi Shura control in source as dots on the map liek other cities. They can then be shown under GNA control on the map. We can maintain accuracy this way. I don't know whether others will be ok but it's the best workaround that I can think of. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

You didn't reply. Does my proposal seem ok? It's your choice of course whether you want to do it or not. I don't have any problems but do inform me once you take a decision. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry.

But why exactly in GNA-colour? The Shura councils are close to al-Qaida and have their own colour, which is white. Maybe we should wait for new informations... Usually, Daeshdaily (http://www.daeshdaily.com/august-19-2016/) also brings news about events around Jihadists in Benghazi.--Ermanarich (talk) 18:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

I just saw, that there are very many hits if you search news for "Shura Benghazi". Could you help me searching there? For now, I mostly see reports abou the Qawarsha area there, but I think it should be possible to find the other locations under control of it, too.--Ermanarich (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

This one http://eyeonisisinlibya.com/category/other-jihadi-actors/ seems to be a great source to me. What do you say?--Ermanarich (talk) 18:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh I'm really sorry for the mistake in my earlier comment. I accidentally said "towns shown under GNA control in the source". I actually meant to say "towns shown under "Benghazi Shura" control in the source. Newsboy39 (talk) 05:05, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your source, it seems ok. I've also found a news article from Libyan Herald that mentions the areas partially or fully under Benghazi Shura control as well as the Libyan Nation Army's offensive to recapture the territories under Benghazi Shura. This one: https://www.libyaherald.com/2016/08/20/lna-claims-major-advances-in-gwarsha-district-and-offers-ceasefire-to-militants-if-they-surrender-mines-now-the-big-problem-it-says/

Based on the above source and the two articles from the website you gave: this one on June 27 and this article on July 25 we can figure out the following:

• Sabri and Suq Al-Hout are under full Benghazi Shura control with its headquarters in Jufra (not the Jufra District in central Libya, but a town near Benghazi).

• Ganfouda and Gwarsha are contested between Libyan National Army and Benghazi Shura. Newsboy39 (talk) 05:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Sabri and Souq al-Hout are already marked as IS-held on the detailed map and many sources speak about IS in this area. Maybe it's joint control.

The other ones are also marked on this map, except Jufra. Do you know where this town actually is?

And I'm sorry I yet didn't start to tell you how to edit SVG. I hope I can do it the next weekend. --Ermanarich (talk) 17:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

The towns aren't under IS control, they're under Shura control. Islamist groups like IS and Ansar al-Sharia are allied to Benghazi Shura as per sources. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

I am trying to find Jufra. But please make a correction in the map. The map shows Benghazi as a box with black and red square. Black is used to repredent ISIL. However it is the Benghazi Shura that is fighting with LNA in Benghazi not ISIL. See the article Battle of Benghazi (2014-present). Please correct the map and show Benghazi with a red and grey box. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Also I checked the detailed map, neither Sabri or Souq al-Hout are shown under IS control. They aren't even listed in the module. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

This box is the detailed map I meant. It's actually a PNG-version, but there is aalso a SVG-version of it: File:Benghazi Conflict Detailed Map.svg. I will change the colour of Souq al-Hout and Sabri to grey in a few days.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually I think you have misunderstood the Benghazi map. In File:Benghazi Conflict Detailed Map.svg, the black color is being used to show areas under Benghazi Shura control not ISIL control. It seems the oerson who drew thos was only concerned with the Benghazi conflict, and not if this map would be used in the Libyan Civil War map. As IS doesn't control any area around Benghazi, he would have thought he was at liberty to use the black color for Benghazi Shura. Besides, Islamist groups no matter who they are usually associated with the black color. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

No no, I definitely understand the Benghazi map, since I'm the creator. :P

Black shows IS, grey the Shura council. I just didn't yet include it into the map because I'm not sure if it gets the right size. And I used the black colour since some of the sources I used simply didn't make a difference between the Shura council and IS.--Ermanarich (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

IS is only allied in fighting alonside Benghazi Shura like Ansar al-Sharia. None of the latest sources say IS has any territory in Benghazi, if it did how come Sirte is their last stronghold? Your comment means the Benghazi conflict map has been wrong for months. Please correct it now, it will be highly irresponsible to leave it in such a state for more days. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Also Sultan was captured by Benghazi Shura as well: http://www.libyanexpress.com/benghazi-defense-brigades-seize-sultan-district-western-benghazi/ Newsboy39 (talk) 21:11, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Only problem is, that I can find neither Jufrah nor Sultan... But I'll do the other thing right now.--Ermanarich (talk) 21:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Najran conflict

Hi Could you [File:Саудовско-йеменский конфликт.png update] the map ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

I usually don't edit PNG-maps. Have you already tried to contact the creator?--Ermanarich (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Please update Yemeni Civil War Map

Houthis have managed to capture Hefan (Hayfan) according to the Yemen government. Here are the sources for it:

• http://aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/yemen-s-houthis-overrun-southern-taiz-pro-govt-source/620432

• http://english.aawsat.com/2016/08/article55355917/tor-al-baha-brink-humanitarian-disaster

I have already updated the Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map. Please update the svg civil war map as well. In the map, Hefan is shown as a contested area to the east of At Turbah in the southeast Taiz Governorate. Newsboy39 (talk) 08:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, the changes aren't yet significant enough to change. Today I'm also not sure if I would find the time for it and I wont be on Wikipedia the next few days.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Hefan was actually captured many days ago. In my last request to you where I asked you to update the Yemeni civil war map, I meant to include Hefan with 'Azzan, Zinjibar and Ja'ar. However I forgot to include Hefan when I made the request and didn't remember it till days later. I don't believe capture of a district is insignificant, especially as it puts Houthis in control of entire south of Taiz Governorate and puts them in a position to cut of all supply routes to Taiz. I hope you update the map.

But anyway what about the cities I mentioned are under control of Benghazi Shura? Newsboy39 (talk) 17:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Just being curious, I want to know how long does it take you to redraw the map? Say for example, you were to show Hefan under Houthi control. How long will it take you to redraw the map and show Hefan and its surrounding area in green color. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't see this one. If I already know where it is, not long. Maximum two minutes. But normally I have to search for changes all over the map. In this case, it needs much more time. But I edit the maps only from informations already given at the Module/Template.--Ermanarich (talk) 18:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Benghazi and areas controlled by the Shura council of Benghazi Revolutionaries

Hi, yeah that map is inaccurate, for one Qawarsha was put where Tika should be, Qawarsha is much further north, the other villages are incorrect also, as they are further south.

now there indeed was an attack on these areas of Sultan and Jalidiya in early july, by the so called Benghazi Defence Brigades (members of Shura Council who fled Benghazi to Western Libya early on, where they formed the brigade) but these were easily repelled because they advanced in open areas and were therefore heavily bombed by LAF.

another offensive in August penetrated until Maqrun, but last week LNA recaptured it along with Raqta and Jalidiya, however, Sultan remains under control of BDB, the latter village is just at the beginning of Benghazi Governorate.

as for Qawarsha, it is mostly under LNA control after the recent offensive.

i just want to point out that Libyan Express is Pro-GNC, you should - if you do not - follow Pro-LNA Libya's Channel also to get both sides of the story: http://en.libyaschannel.com/

this is a map from July:

http://imgur.com/a/zoD15

Shaltut (talk) 19:12, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

I have found Sultan on Google Maps

I have found Sultan on Google Maps. Just search for "Sultan Libya" in the Google Maps or alternatively use these coordinates 31.095833,20.23083299999996. The town is actually much farther south than anything in your Benghazi conflict map, therefore it is not in there. It's not even a part of the Benghazi district, it is in Al Wahat District. Newsboy39 (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Great, I'll add it soon. By the way, do you know how to edit modules? If I remember right you already edited there.--Ermanarich (talk) 18:15, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Yes I do know already. Newsboy39 (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Please update Yemen civil war map

Yemen government forces have captured all of the settlements and towns around Zinjibar and Ja'ar with only Al Mahfad District remaining as the stronghold of AQAP in the Abyan province, see: http://www.albawaba.com/news/yemeni-forces-target-al-qaeda-stronghold-abyan-876252.

Also as usual use Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map as reference. Also while your making the changes, please also show the Hefan district under Houthi control as I requested earlier. All these changes seem pretty significant combined, so I hope you will update the map. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I'll do it on friday, since I'm currently not at home. Thanks for the info.--Ermanarich (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I made some mistakes earlier in writing my comment. I earlier "with only Al Mahfad remaining their stronghold".What I meant to say is "with only Al Mahfad District remaining the stronghold of AQAP". Sorry for that, I've corrected it now. Newsboy39 (talk) 10:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

It's Friday, but you haven't updated any of the maps. At the least you can correct the Libyan Civil War map. In the maps Benghazi is shown with a square of black and red blocks. However, it should be red and white blocks as it is contested between Benghazi Shura and Libyan National Army. Newsboy39 (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm really sorry. That's at least voluntary... I'll definitely do it tomorrow!--Ermanarich (talk) 00:24, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Done.

About the Libyan Civil War map, that's more complicated... The patches aren't shown at the original file and I know neither how they came there nor how to remove them.--Ermanarich (talk) 13:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Alright doesn't matter if you can't correct the Libyan one, but can you at the least show the area of town of Sultan under Benghazi Shura control? Newsboy39 (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I don't mean this offensive, but aren't you able to edit the map modules, too?

I was referring to the civil war map, not the module. Newsboy39 (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

As I already said at another place, I only copy from the modules. Furthermore, the coordinates don't help me when I'm searching where this Sultan exactly is.--Ermanarich (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

That might be because when you enter the coordinates of Sultan, the map zooms in too much. When you enter the coordinates and the map takes you to that location, try zooming out but not too much. You will see the name of Sultan. Newsboy39 (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I looked at the source again, for the edit. But this source says, Dignity reconquered Sultan and the checkpoint.--Ermanarich (talk) 21:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I think you are mistaken. The source only has LNA claiming LNA thwarted the attack while BDB claimed they won and captured Sultan. Well this does complicate things. Maybe we can show Sultan as contested or as an unclear situation then. Newsboy39 (talk) 21:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

A few things: First is, that the BDB seem to be in two major areas. In Qanfoudah and Qawarsha, they are nearly beaten (LNA claims that they are already conquered Qawarsha completely: http://www.daeshdaily.com/august-25-2016/). But in the south, they are obviously much stronger, since they tried to capture Ajdabiya (http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/generalnews/2016/07/11/libyan-army-secures-ajdabiya-military-says_b77b03a6-7f58-48c0-9f3e-32cb8c4d4c1d.html Important here is, that this source claims LNA controlls Ajdabiya and not GNA-affiliated groups). And now a really important source I've found: The Libya Herald has some decent articles about the whole situation around Benghazi: https://www.libyaherald.com/2016/07/20/bdb-column-said-to-be-in-full-retreat-from-magroun/ https://www.libyaherald.com/2016/07/10/army-claims-capture-of-sharksi-his-bdb-militia-deny-it/ https://www.libyaherald.com/2016/07/17/police-arrest-alleged-bdb-supporters-in-soloug-and-yemenis-report/

After having a conclusion here, we should first include it into the module and afterwards I'll make the map update.--Ermanarich (talk) 23:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Racist Comments

This user writes racist comments and needs to be warned. Thank you. -78.171.130.160 (talk) 20:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

When did criticising intolerant and regressive parts of a religion become racism?

And apart from that, I'm a leftist and participated in several demonstrations against right-wing organisations of my country. So don't you dare calling me racist again.--Ermanarich (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Ermanarich, I'm not trying to criticize you or trying to act smarter, but "criticising intolerant and regressive parts of a religion" or having any view about it whether favorable or unfavourable is personal POV. As per Wikipedia's rules, this website isn't a place for any kind of personal POV. This place is just for editing and improving the encyclopedia. Newsboy39 (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Sure. I just wanted to defend myself against the accusations that I'd be racist or islamophobe. And for that I understand the Wikipedia's rules, see the section below, "Hamas".--Ermanarich (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hamas

So, let's come back to the debate about Hamas? Are they a terrorist organisation or not? Has the United Nations declared them to be a terror group or has only one country and the giant it controls with its lobbies declared it so? What does Russia say about Hamas? How about China? Or even Turkey? I'm curious to hear what you have to say. Thank you. -78.171.130.160 (talk) 20:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

You seem to be unable to understand it: My opinion about the Hamas is not relevant for Wikipedia or any other Lexikon. I heavily dislike this organisation and its agenda, but it's not up to me to say if they are terrorists or not.--Ermanarich (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Honestly I don't understand why you are arguing over this issue Anon IP editor. This isn't the place to argue. Newsboy39 (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Mistake in your map

Syrian Army has captured Darayya, it's even shown in the module under government control. However the map still shows it under FSA/opposition control. Can you correct the map? Newsboy39 (talk) 00:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I will. It's sometimes hard to find all the changes on the map. i already tried to ask editors to write in the edit summary, where the village/town they changed is (governorate, cearby city), but that didn't work.--Ermanarich (talk) 00:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I took a closer look at the situation. I thought that the Rif_Dimashq map would've been updated and I could directly include it. I don't want to make a half thing there (which would be: red point, but green area under it), so I'll wait until this map is updated (or I'll do it myself, but first I need some sleep) before I include it in the new map. Same situation in smaller is currently in Deir ez-Zor with the Panorama roundabout.--Ermanarich (talk) 02:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

The Rif Dimashq offensive map has been updated and Darayya is shown under government control. Can you update the Syrian civil war map now? Newsboy39 (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Please update Yemeni civil war map

Sorry I keep asking you again and again, territories are changing hands rapidly these days. But can you please Yemeni Civil War Map again? Yemeni government has captured all cities of Abyan Province. Only a training camp remains under AQAP control it seems. As usual you can use Template:Yemeni Civil War detailed map. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I'll eat now and do it afterwards. And then I think it may be a good thing to tell you how to edit maps with Inkscape. ;)--Ermanarich (talk) 18:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

About the Libyan Civil War

I'm a lot confused about this, so I thought it would be better if I created a new separate discussion about this topic.

First of all I will like to say I was wrong about Jufrah, it does seem that BDB's stronghold is somewhere in Jufra District ([2]). I can't find where exactly, I'll try again.

But for now lets try putting some things in perspective:

BDB/Benghazi Shura currently control Sabri, Souq al-Hout, Sultan and Qunfudah as far as we can tell.

Am I correct? Now your turn to tell which areas are under BDB's control. Newsboy39 (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, the situation around this Benghazi Shura is quite strange, since they seem to be able to move freely all over the country (Only in Benghazi, there they're surrounded). Qunfudah is definitely under Benghazi Shura control, for Qawarsha the army claims to have recaptured it, but these claims haven't been confirmed yet. Sabri and Souq al-Hout are still controlled by Benghazi Shura, the LNA wasn't yet able to break through their defense lines.

I'd add a Benghazi Shura rural presence near en-Naga oil field, since they were able to attack this. Or do you think they long left this area? Sultan seems to be under their control. Magroun was left, al-Jiladea too. Qaminis and Suluq are still controlled by LNA, as well as Karkoura.

If you agree then we could start searching the locations and include them to the module.--Ermanarich (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

A few more things. To your question you deleted, I'm male. If you want to discuss something about politics or something, we could do it over email or something. And the other thing is that I'll remove some of your older messages for the sake of abridgement.--Ermanarich (talk) 16:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

There are differing reports of who was behind the attack on en-Naga oil field. Libya Herald says it was BDB. But Asharq al-Awsat claims it was ISIL. Newsboy39 (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Then I suggest we should simply let it out. They didn't conquer it and it's only assumptions that one of the two groups is still near this oil field.--Ermanarich (talk) 16:53, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Qawarsah, Qunfudah are already in the Benghazi conflict detailed map, so there is no need for them to be in the module. Where are Sabri and Souq al-Hout in the Benghazi map though? I can't find them. If they are the ones whose name are written just in Arabic, then you should add their names in English as well as many people can't understand Arabic. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:00, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Sabri and Souq al-Hout are in the area where Sidi Khiribech stands. As I understand it (because geonames for example shows incredibly many names for this area), there are much more very small neighbourhoods under the Shura Benghazi control. Souq al-Hout (literally fish market, if the transl. was right) is only the southernmost and Sabri the northernmost parts of it and are mentioned more often in the media because there are more clashes.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok so that means the only area controlled by BDB not in the module and civil war map is Sultan. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Also it seems like LNA indeed has captured Qwarsha [3]. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:47, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I only see "page not found". And for Sultan, I agree. I'll add it now, as well as Karkoura, al-Jiladea and Magroun, if I can find their location.--Ermanarich (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Strange, I can open the Newsweeks source. I don't know how you cannot. Newsboy39 (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Hm, ok. Well I guess you are not lying, wouldn't make sense at all, so I'll change it at the Benghazi map afterwards. One important thing we forgot: What's now with Ajdabiya and the article where the LNA claimed to be in Ajdabiya and have repelled Shura Benghazi?--Ermanarich (talk) 18:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Ajdabiya is indeed under LNA control. LNA sacked its mayor and took complete administrative control of it last week: [4]. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The module however incorrectly portrays Ajdabiya under GNA control, LNA is opposed to GNA. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Could you do that at the Module? I'll eat something now. On the map module, I included Sultan (BDF), Kurkurah and al-Maqrun(LNA). I couldn't find al-Jiladea. --Ermanarich (talk) 18:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah sure. Newsboy39 (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I've done it, and I've also made some corrections. Can you add the locations in the civil war map as well? Also while you're at it, please try changing Benghazi to either white and red yellow contested blocks or simply replace it with Bevmnghazi detailed conflict map if you can't. Thank you. Newsboy39 (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm quitting Wikipedia

I've decided to quit Wikipedia. Thanks for your lessons on Inkscape anyway. The reason behind me leaving is because I'm tired of people valuing what they believe as well as their personal POV over that of Wiki. The constant arguing (more like verbal fighting) is tiresome as well.

So anyone does not make false accusation against me, this isn't about my edits, I do not mind anyone raising objections and changing my content as long as they are based on proper reasons and not just personal POV or bias.

I came here to edit and contribute, but I have realised this place is now nothing but a cesspool where people not bothering about anything else than their own personal goals. The language might seem strong but I can't think of anything else to say. I do not see any use in continuing at a place that is becoming an anarchist dictatorship. Even the admins can do so much and sometimes aren't even bothered.

Based on the above reasons ai am quitting. I will be doing so after Mosul is recaptured by Iraqi government forces. This is because some user keeps ruining the style and format of the article Mosul offensive by copying and oasting directly from websites which is potential copyvio. After the offensive ends, I shall quit. The reason I'm informing you is because you seem to be one of the few who cares more about the encyclopaedia than your POV. Good bye. Newsboy39 (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Was there no way to write it before I do this lesson...? I mean that was now just a good time wasted for nothing...--Ermanarich (talk) 16:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

But apart from that, this is sad to hear. It really needs contributors like you here, although I can understand your decision.--Ermanarich (talk) 16:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Actually I was unsure about quitting until today. The thing that finally got to me was the constant edit-warring and personal accusations on Jarabulus offensive. When I received your messages on how to use Inkscape, I decided to tell you. Newsboy39 (talk) 16:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Hm... And is there no way to keep you here?--Ermanarich (talk) 16:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Once this place starts to improve, I might come back. But until then, I can't take this anymore. Newsboy39 (talk) 16:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Shadowrun

Hey you're a German right? I could use your help with some German books. You see I'm a Shadowrun fan and I edit the English Shadowrun Wiki sometimes. I don't know if you've heard of it, it's the most popular cyberpunk franchise. Unfortunately many of its books and games are in German, which I need translator to read and in case of physical books I can't use translator. The Shadowrun Wiki is devoid of lot of information especially as quite a lot of material of the franchise is in German. Most of the information can probably be filled with material from German books. And a native German is more reliable than a translator. So if you don't mind, I will like to email you if in case I need your help in properly and accurately translating the German material. It won't be large, just a few important paragraphs at the most. Will you be ok with it? Newsboy39 (talk) 22:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Oh shit, I conpletely missed this one. Yes, I speak German.

And of course, just send me the stuff I think I should be able to translate that. I for my part am not really familiar with Shadowrun, but I think I already heard about it.--Ermanarich (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I thought earlier you weren't interested, so I dropped the subject. But thanks for agreeing. Newsboy39 (talk) 02:12, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please correct Boko Haram insurgency map

Hi again. Can you correct Boko Haram insurgency map? The map incorrectly shows Yenagoa in Borno State however it is actually located in Rivers State, far to the south of Abuja. In addition Nigerian military has recently admitted that Boko Haram still control Abadam (http://english.aawsat.com/2016/09/article55357543/nigerian-army-commander-weeks-left-boko-haram). I have made the corrections in Template:Nigerian insurgency detailed map. Abadam is located near the eaelier incorrect position of Yenagoa in the template. Please make corrections in the insurgency map as well. Thank you. Newsboy39 (talk) 06:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Yup, I'll do it the next time.--Ermanarich (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm very sorry. I just saw that it's a PNG-map. I don't edit this format.--Ermanarich (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

You don't know how to edit it? Well can you direct me to someone who can then? Newsboy39 (talk) 12:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

I have replaced png map of Boko Haram insurgency with svg map

Hello Ermanarich, I've replaced the png map of Boko Haram insurgency with a svg map. It shall be easier for you to edit it. In addition, I have also made some changes to Module:Nigerian insurgency detailed map showing districts of Gwoza and Marte which are still partially under Boko Haram control as per Borno State government's admission. Please make these changes on the svg map of the insurgency too. And also please correct Yenagoa's location in addition to adding Abadam which is under Boko Haram control. Newsboy39 (talk) 07:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

I was away for some days, but I did it today.--Ermanarich (talk) 23:15, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Excellent work on updating the Libya civil war map and especially on your overhaul of the Syrian civil war map Eik Corell (talk) 01:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

More corrections and update in Libyan Civil War needed

More changes are needed. Brega has been completely captured by LNA, so please show it under their control (http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/09/khalifa-haftar-forces-seizes-oil-port-brega-libya-160914061306594.html). Also please remove the double mention of Brega and New Brega from the map and also please correct Brega's location. New Brega is not a city, but a part of the original Brega and as such I have removed it from the module. I have also removed Brega's double mention. And last of all I also corrected its location. Please make these changes in the map as well. Thank you. Newsboy39 (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Sidra and Ras Lanuf have been recaptured by PFG (http://www.libyaobserver.ly/news/pfg-retakes-sidra-and-ras-lanuf-oil-terminals-east-libya). Add that as well. Newsboy39 (talk) 10:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Forget about Sidra and Ras Lanuf, the PFG offensive has failed to recapture them (https://www.libyaherald.com/2016/09/18/jadhrans-pfg-fail-to-retake-sidra-and-ras-lanuf-export-terminals/). Newsboy39 (talk)

Syria/Iraq location map road overlay.svg

Hi Ermanarich, thanks for the barnstar! That's really appreciated  :) Also - sorry for the delay replying, I've been away on vacation, but back now. It would be absolutely great if you can do the Iraq map - I always meant to do this "soon", but the dreaded "real life" has been rearing its ugly head continually...

So, I started to explain what I did in detail (using Inkscape), but to get the detail right, it becomes quite involved to describe the calculations and I'm unfortunately fazing out because it's late at night here. I hope it'll be ok if I get back to you tomorrow/thursday in this space. Talk to you soon... Piotr Deuar (talk) 00:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi Again,

I wrote out now a long explanation on my talk page here. Sorry it took so long. If something's not clear there, please ask away! I may have forgotten some minor but tricky elements, it's been a couple of months since I did this.

All the best,

Piotr Deuar (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Libyan Civil War Map

Hello! I have been looking at your map regarding the Libyan Civil War, especially the West Tripoli aerea. I was wondering, since when is not Surman town LNA-held? According to this report, it was taken by the Army on December 2014, along with Al-Ajaiylat (which in the map is also partially held by former Dawn militias).

Thank you so much for your assist. Best regards, --Bespin (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

This report is quite old, so I have to confess that I'm not sure, if may have changed. Since end 2014, one and a half years left, years full of change for Libya (as well as for the rest of the world). But if you have newer reports which say it's in the hands of the LNA, it would be great if you could change this at the Module:Libyan Civil War detailed map, I'll include it in the map afterwards.

Thanks for the information. Regards, Ermanarich (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Could you update the map please ? Please see the module. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Shahba region/canton

Hi, there is some NPOV pushing going on from politically motivated users to remove or destroy the Shahba region article. Could you help keeping this valuable and informational article clean from such vandalism/disruptive editing from users wanting to destroy it? Kind regards --Niele~enwiki (talk) 16:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Please update Iraqi civil war map

I see you edit maps. Can you please update File:Iraq war map.png? It hasn't been updated for over 2 months, the last edit to it was a restoration of the edit from 26 August. 61.0.202.93 (talk) 07:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm actually only editing SVG and no PNG files. Some time ago I planned to create a SVG-version of the Iraqi civil war map, but I need to create this road overlay first and I simply don't find the time to do this.--Ermanarich (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Then who is gonna do it? NOBODY has made any actual changes to it in more than 2 months. I have contatacted other map makers also, but no one seems to care or respond. Are you gonna just let the map stay as the way it is for such a long time just because you don't edit PNG maps? 117.214.155.25 (talk) 13:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ermanarich. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

CAR Civil War Map

I created this module nearly 6 months before. It's empty because for long time i don't work in it, instead i focused on other projects at that time. I wanted to ask Pbfreespace3, but he's indef-blocked right now. So can you help me to fill this map? If pbfreespace3 is unblocked, tell him about this map, so he can edit that map i created months ago. OK? I've returned to war map area recently after election-opinion polling area right now. --SMB99thx XD (contribs) 09:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

If I find the time and also the sources for it, I will. But could you maybe also help arguing for an unblock of Pbfreespace3 at his talk page?--Ermanarich (talk) 15:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Libyan civil war and Yemeni civil war

Hi Could you update the maps after a lot events ? Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

I hope that I'll find the time to get to it the next days.--Ermanarich (talk) 15:30, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Benghazi Battle Map - Please Update

Please update the Benghazi Battle Map. As of this weekend, al-Qaeda and ISIL forces have been eliminated in the Ganfouda District, meaning that the remaining terrorist forces are completely trapped within the small Al-Sabri - Souq al-Hout pocket. LightandDark2000 (talk) 10:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I'll do it today! But the fronts in al-Sabri & Souq al-Houth didn't change, right?--Ermanarich (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Kurdistan Democratic Solution Party

hi, thank you for your help on this article. Do they claim to be libertarian socialist on their website, or print? Have others described them as such? Darkstar1st (talk) 01:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Not explicitly, but they promote Democratic Confederalism, which is part of libertarian socialism.--Ermanarich (talk) 21:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Yemeni Civil War map

Hey, can you please update this? Thanks. Nuke (talk) 02:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Nuke: I guess I find the time somewhen in the next days.--Ermanarich (talk) 15:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ermanarich. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Libya civil war map

The libya svg civil war map is in bad need of update, i made several changes to the map template and i am currently waiting if there is any objections to those changes, so can you please update the map if approved? much thanks --LIBYAĐRA☪OON: 08:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Small fix for weird out of Syrian border overstretch on File:Syrian Civil War map

I noticed a small out of Syrian border overlap spot (seemingly unintentional) on the Syrian Civil War map file. I have attached an image showing the overlap, and an updated self-corrected Inkscape exported file (The updated .SVG is hosted on Google Drive, I got an error when uploading). I was going to attempt an image upload/update myself, but after viewing the template page for the file, I realized it was way outside of my novice editor ability. I am a fan of all your work here.

Gdrive .SVG: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Z3C7l6JLv-VbkBXB7ETrrRhPuSgRcBy/view?usp=sharing

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ermanarich&action=edit&section=new#

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhahner18 (talk • contribs) 23:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry for the late answer and thanks for mentioning. I'll do a general mopup now.--Ermanarich (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ermanarich. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in Yemen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Solidarity Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Incoherent complaining

Hi, Stop using wikipedia to propagate your ultra nationalist ideas. I've seen, from the numerous posts on your page, you have been warned against using Wikipedia for racists and other fringe ideas. Your personal opinions should stay personal. Should you NOT desist, I will be escalating this. --41.190.14.248 (talk) 08:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea what you're talking about, this is ridiculous. I'm not a nationalist, of what country even? Did you maybe confuse me with somebody else?--Ermanarich (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Yemeni Workers' Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yemeni Workers' Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yemeni Workers' Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:02, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Social Labour Party (Wazef) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Social Labour Party (Wazef), is not suitable as written to remain published. A single reference is not enough to establish notability or indeed provide any depth of detail regarding the organisation. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Al-Ahrar Organization is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:17, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, brightened up my day to see this :)--Ermanarich (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Labour Party (Wazef) (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Social Labour Party (Wazef) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Social Labour Party (Wazef)

Hello, Ermanarich. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Social Labour Party (Wazef), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Social Labour Party (Wazef)

Hello, Ermanarich. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Social Labour Party".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Ermanarich. Thank you for your work on People's Front (Kurdistan Region). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ermanarich. Thank you for your work on National Stance Movement. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the nice comment. :)--Ermanarich (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kurdistan Islamic Relations Movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurdistan Islamic Relations Movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurdistan Islamic Relations Movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)