User talk:Jvngkook

Welcome!

Hello, Jvngkook, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Tianfu Center

It's not a Wiki page.Xx236 (talk) 11:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bandar Malaysia Iconic Tower Xx236 (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create such short pages like KLCC East Gate Tower, they'll be removed.Xx236 (talk) 11:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 11:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KLCC East Gate Tower

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on KLCC East Gate Tower requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bandar Malaysia Iconic Tower

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bandar Malaysia Iconic Tower requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tianfu Center

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Tianfu Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KLCC East Gate Tower

The article KLCC East Gate Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for over a year, probably because it's still only a proposal. Violates WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Your edits on Tradewinds Square, KL118 and List of future tallest buildings have been reverted (yet again). You have not supplied a reliable source for these edits. You are engaged in an edit war and you may be blocked if you continue to make edits without providing a source for your changes Robynthehode (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at List of future tallest buildings.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Robynthehode (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources and Edit Process

Are you distrubt me now?

Why its my edit was wrong?

I found it on skyscraperpage.com

Jvngkook (talk) 07:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Skyscraperpage.com is not a reliable source as it is a wiki - anyone can edit it and the information there and at other sites such as Emporis is not reliable. Any information from these sources should be supported by reliable verifiable source. The reliable source for tall buildings is Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat ([1]). For example the figures for Tradewinds A from this source is 608m [2] and the figure for KL118 is 630m [3]. However CTBUH does make errors and if other reliable sources contradict their figures. When you make edits you should provide an edit summary so other editors can see why you have made the edit or where you have got the information from. I asked you to do this a number of times across the various articles you have edited but up until now you did not do this. Your repeated changes to reliably sourced figures and your failure to provide an edit summary or to go to the article talk page meant I was left with no option other than to warn you about disruptive editing. I understand you have made the edits in good faith using a source you believe is correct but there is a process to follow in editing Wikipedia. Please see WP:DISPUTE for advice on the procedure. You might also like to read WP:RELIABLE. Please do not change the edits I have made without providing an alternative reliable source and discussing any change on the talk page first. If I have made an error in my revert edits of your contributions then please let me know either here or on the article talk page. However going forward it would be best to continue any specific discussions about the articles you have edited at the article talk page so other editors can see the discussion rather than discuss it here. Thank you Robynthehode (talk) 07:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Zanygenius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Robynthehode have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Comment from Zanygenius: It appears you are in an edit conflict, please don't vandalize to get your point across. If you're willing, I can help with the tower article. Sincerely, User: Zanygenius(talk page) 20:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]