User talk:Justice Faith
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Justice Faith, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 10:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Nengi Hampson (February 1)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Justice Faith!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson has a new comment
[edit]
I came across this comment of yours & all I have to say is at this juncture, you all are just poising the well for your client. What other non Nigerian editors like the prolific editor @Theroadislong might not catch but other sincere Nigerians editors would, is that we know this is UPE(which means you are accepting rewards (financially) or otherwise) for the creation of this article, there’s a definite COI here as you are walking the very thin line of WP:SPA. I put it to you that you have an undisclosed COI & you must disclose this or the article would never ever be accepted, and that’s a factual statement. Celestina007 (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Truth is, I've only been on Wikipedia for four months, so I've not yet mastered how to approach users on their talk pages. Perhaps that's why my comments are being misconstrued.
My truth however is that nobody is paying me. These comments are actually offensive cause God knows I log onto Wikipedia everyday and read articles and go to people's user pages to try and learn a thing or two. Everyday! I'm really just trying to learn how to use the platform and what works and what doesn't. These accusations are grave really. Justice Faith (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Paid editing?
[edit]
Hello Justice Faith. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Justice Faith. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Justice Faith|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 19:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey @Theroadislong you're mistaken, I have not been paid to make the draft or any other Wikipedia edits I've been making to pages. I didn't even know some people were paid to create pages.
My draft was declined and I've since made edits but have not yet resubmitted. I was advised by you to use a neutral tone, and because I actually went and read all the Wikipedia rules you attached to your review on my draft. I've since gotten a better understanding of how to draft thats all. Justice Faith (talk) 06:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm just curious as to what part of my edits give a "paid" impression. Justice Faith (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Is it because I make so many edits? Cause my explanation for that is that I don't want the draft to be declined again. And I've read some articles featured on wiki as good articles and those you've created and I also desire for the draft to be up to Wikipedia standard such that I don't take as long to create other pages in the near future.
I apologise for the numerous comments, I'm just shocked about the accusations. Justice Faith (talk) 07:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rebecca Nengi Hampson (March 7)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rebecca Nengi Hampson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
There's nothing to be disclosed. No conflict of interest, just 4 months of research and effort.
I've made peace with the fact that you think I'm lying and it's okay. Just delete the draft. Eventually someone else will pick interest in the subject and maybe write better than me and have theirs accepted.
As for my draft, can't have my character tainted by a stranger.
Kindly delete it. Justice Faith (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)