User talk:Juraj cisarik

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Juraj cisarik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fourohfour 20:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear link

Hi, I do not understand what the purpose of the link in the Bajerovce article is. (See link title The link about Bajerovce:). Can you please explain it? Thank you. Fourohfour 20:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. - Mike Rosoft 14:06, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, please don't improperly add Category:Cities and towns in Slovakia to articles. Inclusion of this text means that the article belongs to the category; most of the articles you have added to the category don't actually belongs there (and some of them already are in the category). Also please note that there exists a Category:Villages in Slovakia which is often a better choice. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 14:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, I don't think there is any reason to list every Greek Catholic priest of every town and village in Slovakia (why Greek Catholic, and not Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant, etc.?) - Mike Rosoft 14:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the author is not prepared to explain (or justify) the inclusion of these people, I recommend that they be removed.

Perhaps there is more significance of these people in Slovak culture, but I have heard nothing to indicate this. Fourohfour 14:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have already done so. - Mike Rosoft 14:58, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This guy (Juraj cisarik) is just a sleazy spammer wasting other people's time. You, admins should ban him.
BTW, there is no special way to treat or see this issues in Slovakia. Jurohi 18:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I already noticed that he was here to promote his own book and website. When he failed to respond to my notifications, I blocked him for five minutes to get his attention, and as a result he stopped contributing altogether. I don't think any more action is necessary. - Mike Rosoft 12:01, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is that what it was supposed to be? I thought his/her contributions were so unclear that I couldn't even tell if they were meant to be spam or not. Perhaps it was just pagerank abuse, but then why bother placing it in a remotely relevant article? Ah.... so it wouldn't get deleted straight away. Clever... Fourohfour 15:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Ranking at Google is quite an obvious reason. Slovakia is a homeland of hackers, virus and antivirus writers, and many net know how knowledgeable people... sometimes missusing their knowledge, unfortunately. :) Jurohi 16:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bokša

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bokša, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]