User talk:Junulo

Welcome!

Hello, Junulo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Easter Bunny worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Georgette2 21:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Easter Bunny, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 21:09, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ectopic pregnancy, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I asked a question that I wanted an answer to. Is that "vandalism"? I'm sorry, but I'm new to Wikipedia, but I wasn't aware that asking a question was vandalism. And why were my comments deleted from the other sections? ~ Junulo

While nonsense edits are tolerated in the sandbox, offensive material is not. If you persist, you will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? -Junulo 22:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I think most of your edits were fine, and Ohnoitsjamie was perhaps a bit heavy handed, I think it was this edit which singled you out. Someone sees "raped by a fart", and figures you're messing about. It's best to keep your titles a little less insane! You're probably aware that Wikipedia takes a lot of vandalism, so each edit can't always be scrutinized closely enough to correctly assess the border-line cases. Most of your edits seem to be okay, but you're best sticking to talk pages until you get a feel for the Wiki-atmosphere and Wikisoftware. I hope you like the place and stay for good. I notice your userpage doesn't exist - why don't you work on that (click on the name in your signature to start it)? Take a look at mine and other people's for ideas. :) --Seans Potato Business 00:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Flaggeninkal

A tag has been placed on Flaggeninkal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. StephenBuxton (talk) 22:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Google has no results for Flaggeninkal, I'm guessing it's something that was "made up". Even a lot of things that actually exist don't qualify for Wikipedia articles. They have to be important enough. Take a look at WP:Notability. If you ever have any questions, you can ask me at my talk page (click "potato business" in my signature) or you can ask on the help desk: Wikipedia:Help_desk. Wikipedia is a very big place. I've been around for a couple of years and still don't understand half of what goes on, but I've got enough down to be able to contribute usefully. You probably just need a couple of weeks to get your "Wikipedia legs" (like sea legs but different). --Seans Potato Business 00:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

picture

We need a picture of an actual blastocyst. The article at baby doesn't have a cross-section diagram labled eyes, nose, heart, ear, etc. Junulo (talk) 17:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "an actual blastocyst"? I think you might have your terms mixed up, 'cause facial features are not discernible at the blastocyst stage. Do you mean an embryo? --Seans Potato Business 23:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--I was using an analogy. I just thought an actual picture would be nice. Novjunulo (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:41, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time. Infrogmation (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Junulo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I vandalized twice, got a warning for my first vandalism, and was blocked for my second vandalism, in that order; I was blocked for what I did BEFORE the afore mentioned warning.

Decline reason:

We at least need your assurance that you won't continue. Mango juice^talk 14:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've referred the unblock request to the blocking admin. I am inclined to grant it but will refer to him first. Stifle (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User has been warned about junk edits before; however I have no objection to the current block being lifted early if Junulo expresses intent to refrain from making such inappropriate or problem edits in the future. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block reset

Per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Junulo, your 1 month block has been reset, effective from today, due to sock puppetry. Jehochman ^Talk 12:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]