User talk:JuniorLB

August 2018

Hello, Timmediaglobal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Treasure Island Media, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ss112 18:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Treasure Island Media. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. If you continue to remove sourced information, like that Paul Morris's name is really Charles Steven Key, which you evidently seem to be bothered by the inclusion of, you will be reported. Open a discussion on the talk page. Ss112 02:30, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JuniorLB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

JuniorLB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I'm an ex-employee of Treasure Island Media, and as a diehard fan I just want the work of TIM and Paul Morris to be publicly known and appreciated. The edits immediately prior to the block were all sourced and verfiable. As an older gay man myself, this topic is incredibly important to me. I apologize for continuing to use a company-branded account, and understand that its against Wikipedias code of conduct and won't happen again

Decline reason:

Nothing you have said suggests that you understand that the most important reason for the block is promotional editing> Indeed, on the contrary, "as a diehard fan I just want the work of TIM and Paul Morris to be publicly known and appreciated" indicates that further editing for the purpose of promoting or publicising the subject you have edited about is exactly what you intend to do. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed your account from Timmediaglobal, and someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JuniorLB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

RE: JamesBWatson, I'd like to re-iterate that all edits immediately prior to the block [see Prowler Awards 2019] were sourced accurately to the award-giving entity, of which TIM has nothing to do with. If you're accusing me of believing that the difference between a promotional / publicist edit and an "honest" (?) edit is the presence of a verifiable citation, then I'm guilty. I don't understand how presenting factual information is promotional. Are non-fans of any subject the only people allowed to add information to that subjects' page? Please educate me, I yearn to understand this on a deeper level.

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:27, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Editing in order to cause someone "to be publicly known and appreciated" is editing to promote them. If you really really don't understand what promotional editing is then you would not be able to avoid doing it if you were unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JuniorLB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

RE: JamesBWatson, the edit was made because the award was given. What happened, happened, and is sourced. The information presented is factual, therefore the information is not promotional. This is a farce.

Decline reason:

Most of your edits remove sourced content. I think you'd need to explain why that was happening. Beyond that, just because someone won an award, it doesn't mean that Wikipedia reports it. We need citations to independent, reliable sources, such as Variety or The Hollywood Reporter. If they report that someone has won an award, we include it. If not, we don't. This prevents trivial awards, like "Joe's Annual Movie Award for Best Use of a Forklift" from cluttering our lists of awards. Ignoring this to indiscriminately add random awards is often seen as promotional. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:27, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.