User talk:Jungfinglang

Welcome!

Hi Jungfinglang! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 21:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jungfinglang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Jungfinglang (talk) 3:30 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Based on the SPI and other evidence, this appears to be a clear cut case of sockpuppetry. only (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is unfair, I have never had a previous account, and it's seems that long term members can make false claims so they get their own way. so sad wiki is run like this. I thought Wiki had no bullying policy. so here are my reasons for the appeal to be heardd.

1. all edits were done in good faith and no vandalism intended. 2. these accusation made against me have no merit nor have been supported by any evidence, just two vindictive members who want to monopolise wiki for their own selfish gains 3. All edits were made with sourced media found on the internet and in physical printed media. 4. all sources came from sites, like blogs, websites, tools used by the members who reported me for vandalism. 5. Why does wiki allow senior editors to bully new members because senior editors don't like what posted and the senior editors failed to disprove the new edits 6. why does wiki allow seniors editors who know nothing about certain band like bros for example, allow them to manipulate a page that the senior editors have no knowledge of the band, these pages are for people to edit who have knowledge and content to add for example fans who may collected merchandise, annuals, magazines, newspaper articles of their idols so the true facts on bros please www.brosmusicco.uk where this website which has had over 16.000 views and full of bros articles going back to inception of the band. A said day for any new users with editors who troll the innocent

below are some of the website, magazines articles and CD information

7. article from independent publication 8. found another image of bros push reissue cd 9 found another article 10. website

I feel that Wiki doesn't allow members to defend themselves as senior or more experienced members know the tools in blocking so any senior or more experienced can make false allegation so they get members blocked and the member who been accused has no way of defending themselves from the false allegations.

being traeted unfairly

no proof of sock puppetry being labelled this because i reported to senior editors for making unfair changes top pages can some have decency to check out the links i provided

Unjust allegation destroys people and makes WIKI a laughing stock.

WIki needs to address these concerns and make wiki and equal playing field for all

also can richard3120 please not remove any link from my appeal

• Per WP:BLANKING, you cannot remove (or overwrite) declined appeals. You need to post a new appeal if you would like another admin to review. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
  • To be clear, if you continue to blank and overwrite your declined appeal, I will revoked your access to this page. Make a new request, do not overwrite the old one.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)