User talk:Jumpytoo/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Tagging of Pinjra (2017 TV series)

Pinjra (2017 TV series) had context -- the title alone told a reader what it was about. What it lacked was content. I have therefore deleted it under A3 (no content). Please be careful with speedy tags in future -- admins depend on taggers to identify the issue that we need to check for. Also, please in future don't A1 or A3 so quickly. Please allow at least 15 minutes for the creator to add content or context, to avoid discouraging new editors. Thank you for patrolling. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 00:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

by mistake changes in Jaipur Page

Hello, I am Raj. yes by mistake i did remove content on Jaipur Page. Actually i am trying to create our Rawat Public School Page but again & again its redirect to Jaipur Page. Why??? Why happen like this. I was edit my page and after sometime i was checking then its redirect with Jaipur Page. Please let us know why again and again its redirect with Jaipur Page. Please help us. how to do it correct and why its redirect to other page. what problems in my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharmaraj123 (talk • contribs)

It seems that your school is not notable (important) enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. Other people have agreed with this notion, and decided to redirect the article to a more board topic (the city your school is situated in). The page has also been locked to prevent this decision from being reverted. As I had no role in the deletion of the article, please contact any one of the people found in this page for further assitance:Page History Jumpytoo Talk 09:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing !

Thanks for noticing the new article I wrote, Trump: The Kremlin Candidate? !!!

What do you think of the article ? Sagecandor (talk) 22:52, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Sagecandor: It's very high quality for a new article. My suggestions are:

• The infobox picture doesn't seem to fill the infobox space well. Perhaps try to find a picture that will fill the space better.
• The Release and reception part feels a little like boilerplate, especially the first part of the last 4 paragraphs. Try to shuffle the words around a bit.
• There was a bad link formatting I just fixed

Other than that, it is a very high quality and thorough article. Keep up the good work! Jumpytoo Talk 23:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

It's the official picture. I could try a different kind of infobox maybe {{Infobox film}} ? Sagecandor (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! Looks better with {{Infobox film}} ! Sagecandor (talk) 23:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Yep, looks fine now. Jumpytoo Talk 23:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Sometimes, on some topics, in some climates, the first objective of writing a new article should be to try to make sure it doesn't get fucking deleted. You know what I mean? Sagecandor (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but generally if you write articles with that high quality it should pass most scrutiny. Most new articles have major issues, so just having a new article look nice and detailed goes a long way. It's a nice breather between all the one sentence articles or people trying to promote themselves. Jumpytoo Talk 23:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, but recently I've been the subject of WP:WIKIHOUNDING, see comments by an admin about it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defeating ISIS. That article was high quality on creation also. At time of creation the article mentioned that the book was a New York Times Best Seller. At time of creation the article showed the book had received significant coverage from multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. Still, I got harassed after creating that one. You see what I mean? Sagecandor (talk) 00:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, but unfortunately there isn't really any recourse against this. It get's really heated around controversial topics such as politics, and you just have to be professional, regardless of what the other is saying. Though I have looked at their claimed issues, and I do agree that your account is slanted towards anti-Trump topics. I recommend increasing your ratio of creating/editing non-controversial topics. It gives your edit log variety, so you seem well-rounded, and you get experience writing in different ways, which helps you in writing more neutrally. Jumpytoo Talk 01:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

My account is not slanted towards anti-Trump topics. If and when I find reliable sources from any perspective, if those are indeed reliable sources, I will gladly add them. Sagecandor (talk) 01:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

I was talking about the topics of the articles that you edit most frequently, not the content of your edits. Though as long as you are writing high quality content that meets the Wikipedia guidelines, there is nothing wrong with focusing on one topic area. The above was just a suggestion to help you improve the quality of your work even further.

Do you have any other concerns? Jumpytoo Talk 01:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Not at the moment, thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

NPP

Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but maintenance tasks are not for beginners. Please refrain from patrolling pages and tagging them for maintenance or deletion until you have significantly more experience. Now that you have just over 200 mainspace edits you qualify to enroll at the WP:CVUA to learn all about vandalism and what to do about it. It's a much easier task and still extremely important. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

NPP

Hi.I'm just letting you know I have declined the PROD you placed on Capvision. Reason: Clear case of WP:A7 and WP:G11. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks for the welcome Jumpytoo! I'd feel more welcomed were it not for... well... let's hope this all ends well, and you know what they say! Ayy... Georgeqgreg (talk) 02:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

...and as a further aside, I'd just like to say... oops. I should've checked better, since I don't watch the CBeebies block much outside of Sarah & Duck. I'll try harder in the future! Georgeqgreg (talk) 02:57, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

NPP

Hi Jumpytoo. Please stop patrolling articles now – your patrolling does not appear to be in accordance with the instructions at New Page Patrol. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Alvin and the Chipmunks on Family Jr.

Thanks for adding Alvin back to the Family Jr. page. I honestly did not know they were airing it. I mean, it really does sound like a terrible joke! The Chipmunks do not really belong on a preschool channel imo. (You know, I have long suspected Family's schedule people of using certain substances...) Georgeqgreg (talk) 23:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Mistaken block

Hello Jumpytoo. In my haste to block a persistent vandal/troll you recently reverted, I didn't notice that my screen had shifted before I clicked the block button on your name. I unblocked you as soon as I noticed, and I offer you my sincere apologies for sullying your block log. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Jumpytoo Talk 00:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Kavalan Distillery

Hello Jumpytoo. You have wrongly deleted my link on Kavalan Distillery Page. This article provides an accurate and detailed information for readers on Kavalan distillery and whisky making processes. This is not a promotion article. Please review this article again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmorais (talk • contribs) 00:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Similar response to above. Jumpytoo Talk 00:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Virginia Wine

Hello Jumpytoo. You have wrongly deleted my link to Virginia Wine history. This is an in-depth article on Virginia wine history. Please review this article again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmorais (talk • contribs) 00:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

@Rmorais: I removed it because it seemed like blogspam. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow such links, as it is considered promoting your blog. Please review the documents on external links and spam, and conflict of interest (as you wrote the articles in question). You can directly add the contents of the articles onto the pages without using external links, however please ensure that it fits the major guidelines, it can be verified by a reliable source, and you conform to the licensing agreements of Wikipedia (please see here to ensure your content addition is not flagged as a copyright violation). If you believe that the links should be placed onto the articles, feel free to reply with your reasoning. If you have any further questions or concerns, free feel to reply here or ask on WP:TEAHOUSE and someone will be happy to assist you. Jumpytoo Talk 00:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Jumpytoo, thanks for your response. These links are not spam or self promotion links. They are in-depth article links, from a reputed website, just as some of the other links, that would help Wikipedia readers to gain an insight on the topic of Virginia Wine and other topics. I do not gain anything from their inclusion, and if you are wrongly blocking them, without review, or a justifiable reason, I wouldn't contribute again on Wikipedia. Thanks !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmorais (talk • contribs) 00:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

@Rmorais: I did check the reputation of the website before my decision to remove it. I based my decision that it may be blogspam on that:

1. Google searching "grapes and grains", I did not find the website within the first 3 pages

2. Alexa does not have the website in the top 10 million websites. In fact, it is around ~12 million in ranking.

Because of this, I determined that the additions may be for the main purpose of promoting the blog, and removed them. You can directly add the article content to the wiki pages, however please ensure that it fits the major guidelines, it can be verified by a reliable source, it is rewritten to follow the Wikipedia format, and you conform to the licensing agreements of Wikipedia (please see here to ensure your content addition is not flagged as a copyright violation). If you disagree with this, you can ask for a second opinion on WP:TEAHOUSE, and they will be happy to review the edits and determine if they are fit to be on the wiki. Jumpytoo Talk 00:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Jumpytoo, Your answer is fair enough. This is a new website and not a blogspam. If you search with the keyword 'grapes and grains blog' it appears on the 3rd page of google and as 'grapes and grains' on the first page/search result on bing, besides it is also featured on other reputable blog portals. Going forward, I would keep the requirement in mind, that any site added as an external link, should have the criteria you mentioned. Thanks again for the clarification !! --Rmorais (talk) 01:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

John Faso

Your edit to the John Faso article has been reverted (see here for the reason). Please do not add text to Wikipedia which is OR or POV or designed to push a political narrative. Quis separabit? 01:29, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Rms125a@hotmail.com: I did not add the text, please report this issue to the editor who did initally add it. I am aware I reverted an edit that removed it, but I did so because it was an unexplained removal, where the editor who removed it was warned for the exact same edit 15 minutes ago by another patroller. Jumpytoo Talk 02:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Apologies. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Quis separabit? 02:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Rick and Morty (season 3)

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Rick and Morty (season 3). Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morty C-137 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@Morty C-137: The dates are correct, they were just released from official channels. I will re-add the content from the official source of the show in question. Jumpytoo Talk 03:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Better to use WP:RS 3rd party sources. IGN's a good one. Re-added the info... you might want to be careful which sites you use, though, rumor and clickbait sites aren't reliable. Morty C-137 (talk) 03:14, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@Morty C-137: Deadline is considered by consensus to be a RS, for example the Film WikiProject considers it a reliable resource, and you may also do searches on WP:RSN to determine that many editors consider it reliable. Jumpytoo Talk 03:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jumpytoo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Imabashi Station

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Jumpytoo, thanks for creating Imabashi Station!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jumpytoo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve KiHa 187

Hello, Jumpytoo,

Thank you for creating KiHa 187.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 23:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for looking out for "Constructive" changes.

on that note, my changes weren't intended to stick, but were to discover the action potential of an apparently chaotic dispute process whereby we find insulting articles like the Hexagonal_Water article you rescued. perhaps you might glance at the article's Talk section and give a disposition where there clearly appear to be a number of objective submissions, a singular stubborn actor i mentioned, and apparently several potentially commercial TOS violators all in one happy place. the present article is as I say, an insult to the reader, grandstanding a very narrow opinion at the expense of some hard work clearly invested which includes peer reviewed links that are now presently quashed.

thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalllicHydrogenation (talk • contribs) 06:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello!

Hey, I'm new to Wikipedia editing, and the reason I joined it to increase its already amazing usability. On that note, I had added a few links to some pages, and I'd be grateful to know the reason for their removal as this will help me in my future edits. I made those additions as I thought it was adding value to the readers if they wanted to find out more on the given topics of the page. I had made sure to read the citing articles thoroughly to make sure they were relevant and not some marketing copies. There was some government links in there as well. It will be more than helpful if you point out why these links were wrong in my future edits.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uz100 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@Uz100: Hi! Generally Wikipedia has a strong policy on external links. Generally, only links that are for the subject's official website or a high quality source that can't be integrated into the article for whatever reason are kept. Links that could be seen as promotional are generally removed. You can read the full policy here: WP:EL

Regarding the links you added:

* https://www.homewarrantyreviews.com/companies/first-american-home-warranty/ - Review sites are generally seen as promotional and unreliable. Also, the top half of the site is talking about how good the company is, which makes it a promotional advertisement.

* https://consumera.com/auto-warranty/ - This site is more about getting you to sign up for auto insurance with them as an affiliate than providing high quality information about extended warranties. So this would be seen as promotional.

* https://www.usa.gov/car-repair/ - This site is about car repair in general, not car extended warranties. If usa.gov had a page talking specifically about extended warranties it might be OK, but note that Wikipedia is a global site, so it wouldn't be relevant to anyone living outside the USA.

Hope that helps. If you have any further questions, feel free to reply back. And welcome to Wikipedia! :) Jumpytoo Talk 19:15, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the response! This was really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uz100 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for ID'ing sockpuppet Ayush0112

Thanks for for your spot on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ayush0112, I did rather suspect that there was some sock-puppetry going on, but since the edit history was such a garbagefire I figured it'd be easier to tackle the article itself. Hopefully it can now be a stable medium quality article for a bit. --Paul Carpenter (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Dj phroze

Dj phroze is notable alumni of Jacksonville High School, not for promotional use 2289409bk (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

@2289409bk: This person is not notable. A notable person needs to have significant coverage in multiple reliable third-party sources to be regarded as notable on Wikipedia. For example, books, TV biographies, or news articles that focus on that person could be considered significant coverage. A quick Google search shows he has none of that. Jumpytoo Talk 22:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

@Jumpytoo, hi there! I was wondering why you removed the link in Paxoi listing. The site just shows the port of Paxoi and is not innapropriate. Thank you!

Vermantia61 (talk) 05:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Vermantia61

@Vermantia61: Hi! The main reason I removed the link was because it triggered my browsers anti-XSS/malicious script detection. For obvious reasons, websites that could be malicious are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Hope that helps, feel free to reply back if you have any further questions. Jumpytoo Talk 06:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

File:DGS Warehouse Illustration.png

I have provided a response to your request for the deletion of DGS Warehouse Illustration. If you are able to find a free version of this illustration (or photo) showing the entire building as it stood prior to its demolition, then I am very interested. I have searched for years and could not find one. This picture gives the reader an idea of what the building looked like and how big it was. The DGC Stores have not been in operations since the 1970s. I hope it will remain in place as it helps the reader get a sense of how influential the coop was in DC local history. Thank you.Blazing Liberty (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Blazingliberty: Is there a reason you think neither of these two images [1] [2] would be good free replacements? They don't show the full building but I think they get the point across of the size of the building (especially the second one). Cheers, Jumpytoo Talk 20:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Jumpytoo. You have new messages at Blue Riband's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Category:Circular line stations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Circular line stations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:37, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New stations in Japan

Can you help me create articles for these two newcomers?

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%96%80%E5%87%BA%E9%A7%85 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%BF%E3%81%AA%E3%81%BF%E5%AF%84%E5%B1%85%E9%A7%85

Cards84664 16:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

@Cards84664: Sure, I'll take a look later this week Jumpytoo Talk 21:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your entry

I came across this and that was exactly my point. The subject of the article is a billionaire and can easily influence journalism. The article has been created and recreated severally by undisclosed Paid editors, in fact the first time the article was deleted via AFD, it was blatant upe and the next iteration was G5 speedy deleted because it was created by a banned user. As individual editors we stand no chance against a billionaire who wants a Wikipedia article on himself no matter the cost, because he indeed does have the financial mean and influence to get whatever he wants but as a collective we can put an end to this sort of behavior. Celestina007 (talk) 10:22, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shusaku opening

Technical comment / request: the result was not speedy keep, but nomination withdrawn (a subset of speedy keeps, but this is a better wording - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal) recommends using both in closing/edit summaries, as in "speedy keep (nomination withdrawn)"). Could you adjust the wording? TIA. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done Jumpytoo Talk 04:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OPUS: Echo of Starsong (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OPUS: Echo of Starsong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OPUS: Echo of Starsong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of content

I’m was wondering why you deleted the environment and community sections given that neither of them contain promotional content KnowledgeLover42 (talk) 00:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

@KnowledgeLover42: Hey, I removed the content as it felt promotional and the awards are non-notable (there are no reliable, secondary independent sources I found that discuss the companies achievements relating to environment and community). Jumpytoo Talk 04:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in COVID-19. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––FormalDude talk 09:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Olympics

It is so frustrating that people ignore the actual policy that says that Olympians are notable only if they are medalists, and try to argue to keep articles on Olympians because there are so many of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Imabashi Station

The article Imabashi Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Modern article with no effective sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 23:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matsushima-Nichōme Station

The article Matsushima-Nichōme Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Modern article with no effective sources. Fails WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 23:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oki-Matsushima Station

The article Oki-Matsushima Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A modern article that is badly sources. No effective references. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Current single is 404.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 23:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Articles without sources

Hi @Jumpytoo: I happened to be looking at the articles you created. These are all modern articles created in the last year or two and every one from 7 to 12 don't have any effective sources. It is deeply uncool in this day and age to create on Wikipedia without proper references. The train stations seems to be created in 1911 which is ancient, so there should be plenty of coverage available. I will give you until the end of this weekend to see references on there, otherwise I plan to send them as a block to Afd. I review articles on as part of the work I do. The standard now is articles with multiple reference. It is not 2007 or even 2017. If these were new I would send them to Draft so they could be worked on. As they are too old, they will sent to Afd. scope_creep^Talk 23:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

@Jumpytoo: The prods can be ignored in the meantime. scope_creep^Talk 10:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep: Hi, you meant the Kotoden Shido Line articles I created back in 2018? If yes, I can try to take a look for some sources. However I would note that AfD would not be a suitable place to send these articles to as WP:ATD-M applies here + AfD generally does not delete verifiable railway station articles, the most likely 3 results would either be keeping, merging to the line article, or making a list article of all the stations and merging there. If I fail to find anything substantial, a WP:MERGEPROP would be better here (and if you are OK with it, I can write one). Jumpytoo Talk 07:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Cool. But no, not really. The code is the word is verifiable per WP:V. I'll check back at the end of the week. The standard process is that folk who don't reference are usually seen as WP:NOTHERE and blocked. This happens every day of the week and then the articles are deleted as they are blocked and unable to defend them. Single reference are unacceptable. The lowest standard is WP:THREE at Afd. Every sentence needs a reference, per consensus. scope_creep^Talk 08:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I expect to be able to find sources to satisfy V. GNG might be more debatable which is why I wrote all the stuff about ATD and merge proposals. Jumpytoo Talk 09:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

@Scope creep: I've updated the three PRODed articles with a few additional sources to satisfy V. In the interests of saving my time, I will work on the rest of the articles only if you are satisfied of the state of the three articles I updated. If you would still send them through a merge proposal or AfD due to WP:N, I won't stop you, but I encourage you to do a WP:MERGEPROP instead of AfD as you are likely well aware that AfD generally will not delete railway station articles, and there are several viable WP:ATD's. Also, if you do make a merge proposal/AfD, I would recommend bundling all the Kotoden Shido Line stations excluding Kawaramachi Station (Kagawa) as I believe they all have similar sourcing. Jumpytoo Talk 01:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

This Kasugagawa Station has been updated. Can you please update these. Those that don't reference, don't stay, then the articles get deleted, or request for draftification at Afd. It is seen as disruptive. So please mentality and reference like everybody else. scope_creep^Talk 16:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

I will do the rest of the articles later today or tomorrow. Thanks for your patience. Jumpytoo Talk 18:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

My article was nominated for deletion and decided to be merged. I don't know what to do.

A page that I created was recently nominated for deletion and then the consensus reached to merge it with Crab Game. I wanted to know whether I am supposed to make this merger manually or it is up to other editors in the community to enforce this decision.

Moreover, I am still not very confident about this move considering I have never seen a work (game) have its creator as a section who has made other notable works.

Moreover could you guide me about guidelines of notability applied on Influencers considering Dani comes under Social media influencers. Are there separate guidelines for Influencer notability. If not then aren't the current notability guidelines ill-fitted for Social media influencers because in such spaces, people can have significant works and fame, be well known and still not get enough media coverage. >>> Extorc.talk 17:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE at Bruno Wang

Hi, thought it was better to have this tangential discussion off the page. I'm under the impression that WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE only applies "Where the living subject of a biographical article has requested deletion" but it seems that I'm mistaken? Can you point me to where you get your understanding that WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE does not require a deletion request from the living subject? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

@Horse Eye's Back: I interpret the policy to include anyone authorized to speak on behalf on the subject (it is WP:BURO if it did not, having the subject needing to make an account and basically say "yes I approve what my spokesperson said"), and for this AfD I believe that to be the case per the COI disclosure, and how they justified their rationale using the same evidence his spokesperson also uses. But I've asked for clarification from them at the AfD, so if their connection does not substantiate this then my rationale would not be valid then. Jumpytoo Talk 03:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for requesting clarification, if they say they're his agent then I would agree that raising WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE is valid but I would still strongly disagree with it as the proper course of action given the overwhelming amount of feature coverage in WP:RS. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Kazuki Takahashi

On 10 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kazuki Takahashi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

SocialPilot Article deleted Issue

SocialPilot is Big Social Media Management Platform is used in multiple countries, its in top 5 https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/best-social-media-management-software/

and the reason of deletion is advertisement article but similarly some of his competitor page where also live

like Buffer (application) and Hootsuite so could you look in to this if could suggest me a better solution for this article i'll be geartfull Anil Dabhi 06:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabhianil8 (talk • contribs)

Updating the page for Tom Brown's School Museum

Following your recent message I have updated again the name of our museum. This time I have left details in the edit page so hopefully the changes will not be reversed.

Thank you Craven15 (talk) 11:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)