User talk:Julissagreen

Welcome!

Hello, Julissagreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 64andtim (chat) 06:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 64andtim (chat) 06:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM) (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Julissagreen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 06:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello Julissagreen. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Julissagreen. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Julissagreen|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:59, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize for the promotional nature of the content I submitted earlier. However, I want to clarify that I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for these edits. As an employee of the company, my intention is to create an introduction page for my organization, as there is currently none available. If I submit another draft, I will make sure to maintain a more neutral tone. Julissagreen (talk) 07:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Employment counts, so you will need to declare as doing paid editing before editing further on this subject. And before submitting another draft, yes, please do see what we mean by neutrality, as that wasn't even in the vicinity of neutral, but also by notability. Wikipedia articles are not intended to be any kind of "introduction page", they are encyclopedia articles. If there is not a substantial quantity of reliable and independent source material that meets these specific requirements as well, we shouldn't have an article about the company at all. Most companies do not pass these requirements. We care about facts that such reliable and independent sources confirm about the company, not about what the company "values" or "commits" to or any of that marketese puffery. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 13:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanford Advanced Materials (August 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: blatant advert.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I'm still perplexed by the reasons for the content's rejection. I believe the page's content maintains a neutral tone by outlining the company's history, innovations, and product lines. I think this page serves as a valuable resource for users seeking relevant information. Do you have any further suggestions for refining the content? Julissagreen (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has zero independent sources. Notability is judged by looking at the depth of coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources, we have no interest in what you or your company website wants to say about the company. Your draft has nothing to indicate that the company would pass the notability criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 08:46, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Stanford Advanced Materials, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]