User talk:JuanP3rs

Overlinking

Please read the guidance at MOS:OVERLINK to get a better understanding of what should be linked in an article. Too many unhelpful links obscure the ones that may be useful to the reader. Thank you. _signed,Willondon (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

"On december" doesn't make any sense in English. If you are not a fluent English speaker, you would probably be best sticking to the Wikipedia edition for your native language (at a guess, probably https://es.wikipedia.org) — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Gabriela Rodríguez de Bukele, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nayib Bukele, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Brooks (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm PizzaKing13. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nayib Bukele seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at El Salvador, you may be blocked from editing. Joyous! Noise! 04:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nayib Bukele. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 18:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm PizzaKing13. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PizzaKing13 PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 17:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Salvadoran election

Please do not repeat information already mentioned in the lead of the article and do not claim that preliminary results are final results. Please wait until the TSE has made an official announcement before naming Bukele the winner. Thanks. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 05:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not add 4 paragraphs of detail into an otherwise insignificant event on the Nayib Bukele page which can be summarized in one sentence. Thank you. PizzaKing13 ^¡Hablame! 03:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an insignificant event. This is a way of saying that the re-election has already been accredited by the TSE. JuanP3rs (talk) 17:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nayib Bukele images

I don't know what "exposing a fugitive from justice" means, or what rule on Wikipedia says you're not allowed to do that, but having an image of Bukele and Cerén is helpful for the "Expulsion from the FMLN" section since Bukele was once an FMLN member (as was Cerén) and the article mentions that Bukele became a critic of Cerén, so a picture of him and Bukele is helpful. You can't say it's "not relevant". Please don't remove it without a valid reason. Thanks. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 07:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Blockade of San Marcos has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Blockade of San Marcos. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blockade of San Marcos has been accepted

Blockade of San Marcos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]