User talk:Jua Cha

Welcome!

Hello, Jua Cha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Baron Larf 23:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon in Madison

Jua Cha, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:

ART+FEMINISM EDIT-A-THON

Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon

Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)

Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare

RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Croix Falls Dam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Croix River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2020 census data

FYI, there is consensus not to present racial and ethnic data from the 2020 Census in the same manner as past censuses, due to differences in methodology. There seems to be consensus to present the data in table form, such as this or this. Bneu2013 (talk) 09:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bneu2013, thanks for this message. I've seen that some editors are using a tabular format, and I certainly haven't changed those existing edits, but I have not seen any actual discussion or consensus that this is the preferred format for newly added 2020 demographic data. If you are aware of such a discussion, could you please provide a link?

I have no objection to presenting numbers in tables, but I do find it concerning that the example tables you linked appear to exclude Hispanic/Latino people from racial categories, when the 2020 census, like those in 2010 and 2000, treats Hispanic/Latino as an ethnic or linguistic category distinct from race (see Race and ethnicity in the United States census). The 2020 census questionnaire explicitly says "Hispanic origins are not races." This distinction is not new and dates from 1997, according a Census FAQ page. So I haven't seen any reason to categorize 2020 race/ethnicity data in a different way than in past years, especially in a way that seems to collapse the intentional distinction between race and ethnicity in the Census Bureau's methodology. If we must use tables, I think the correct approach would be to present entirely separate tables for racial and ethnic categories, since they are entirely separate questions on the census questionnaire. Jua Cha (talk) 13:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a discussion from about a year ago about this topic. There seems to be a narrow consensus not to present racial/ethnic data, table or not, in the same manner as previous censuses, due mainly to the fact that the 2020 census saw an exponential increase in the number of people identifying as multiracial, and the fact that the census bureau seems to be moving away from lumping the multiracial population into one single category. The bureau actually advised against direct comparison of 2020 data to 2010 and 2000 data for this reason. Also, while Hispanic and Latino are technically not a racial category, most reliable sources refer to the racial categories in terms of the non-Hispanic population only, and ignore the racial identification of Hispanics and Latinos, which seems to change significantly with every census, and can give an inaccurate portrayal of a regions changing demographics. Although I haven't seen a concise discussion about it, most users now seem to prefer the table form when presenting census data. The paragraph form largely dates back to a single editor shortly after the project's establishment. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for linking that discussion, it is informative. I see that the concern there was about how to represent the growing number of people who identified with two or more races. The solution proposed in the discussion was a table with separate "alone" and "in-combination" columns for each racial category. That could be helpful. But looking at the live examples you linked above (Los Angeles County & Fulton County), neither is using multiple columns as proposed in the discussion. They just list the single race counts, with a separate row for mixed-race populations, just as the older prose format did in text. I agree with you that comparison between censuses should be done with caution, but I don't think switching to a tabular format necessarily prevents such comparison — indeed, the Los Angeles County example you shared even puts the 2020 results side by side with previous census data in the same table. Thinking about this, prose might actually be better at avoiding direct comparison, because it could allow for a nuanced explanation of multi-racial identities and methodological changes, rather than expecting readers to correctly interpret numbers in isolation. Of course, I acknowledge I haven't included such nuanced explanations in my past edits. I will hold off adding any more 2020 racial/ethnic demographics for a while though and see if a better solution emerges. Jua Cha (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]