User talk:Jtoppy

Speedy deletion of Butserfest

A tag has been placed on Butserfest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 16:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy deletion request as being outside the scope of criteria A7 (see WP:CSD for more information on speedy deletion criteria). However, as it currently stands, the article on Butserfest does fail to demonstrate notability and could still be subject to deletion from an AFD or other other deletion procedure. I recommend that you read the relevant guideline at WP:N and add evidence of reliable third party source coverage of the festival to bring the article up to snuff. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Chunky Rice (talk) 17:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you but could you point out things that could strengthen my article. I am new to all this and I never really relised how complicated it was. Thanks jtoppy

Sure. The first and probably most important thing is sourcing. You need to add sources such as newspaper reports, or coverage from third party reliable sources. Third party, meaning that it needs to be from somebody not associated with the festival. Reliable, meaning that it needs to come from some organization or person that has some sort of fact checking or editorial standard. Blogs and other self-published sources are not reliable. Getting these in there will show both that the subject is notable as well as verifying the information that you're putting in there. Also, please sign your talk page comments by typing four tildes ~~~~. Again, if you have further questions, don't hesitate to ask. -Chunky Rice (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you want to start a new section on a talk page, consider using the new section tab at the top of the page. It'll make things easier for you. -Chunky Rice (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I note that the images that you have uploaded don't have any copyright or license information. You're going to need to include that if you want to avoid getting them deleted. An image on Wikipedia either needs to be free or fall under our fair use policy for non-free content (see WP:NFCC. Take a look at other images, like [1] for an example of a logo with a fair use rationale and licensing information. -Chunky Rice (talk) 18:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Butserfest sign.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Butserfest sign.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Butserfest 2008 image

A couple of years ago, you posted an image of the band Vallenbrosa at the 2008 Butserfest, but your image replaced another one with the same name(File:DSC00360.jpg). I'm going to revive that image under a new name. I hope you don't mind. ----DanTD (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Butserfest sign.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Butserfest

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Butserfest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 12:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Splendid-eddie-1.jpg

The file File:Splendid-eddie-1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Butserfest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Butserfest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butserfest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 02:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]