User talk:Jtmichcock

; Archives
	User_talk:Jtmichcock/Archive_1;

This user may have left Wikipedia. Jtmichcock has not edited Wikipedia since late January 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Jtmichcock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 01:14, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Biggie Munn, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Gurubrahma 03:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured

Congratulations on getting the article on the Bath School disaster featured. It's a very interesting read thanks to the work you put into it. Great job! Kafziel 20:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ditto on the story. I had a small part by creating the Carlton W. Angell link, but am curious as to who the Kenneth Black was who gave you the Girl with the Cat statue? I am trying to locate a Kenneth Black [or a relative] who was/is an architect in Lansing, Michigan and am wondering if there is some connection? Carptrash 01:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are a significant editor to the article posted on the Wikipedia main page today. Jtmichcock, you and the other editors did a terrific job. Dude, I tell you, well done, and admire your talent taking what unfortunately could have been a local history stub into the "brilliant prose" level. LookNorth 02:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the article certainly did. I am from the Midwest and never heard of this before. LookNorth 01:03, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Congrats. youngamerican (talk) 16:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Gerald Ford

No problem; keep you your good work! Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:06, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on getting Ford featured, however late I am to congradulate you. Cheers, Basketball one 10 03:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Jtmichcock, I would like to apologize for edits to the Bath School Disaster article and subsequent vandalism of your talk page by my father or sister (IP 24.17.77.57). They are not experienced Wikipedia users, only having discovered it through me several weeks ago. Please accept this apology.Hoji 06:11, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

On my talk page, you left a "your're welcome" for a "note of thanks." Maybe I'm confused, but I thought I left you a note of congratulations, not thanks. Anyways, keep up the good work. youngamerican (talk) 17:04, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar? It wasn't me. You certainly deserve one for this article and the work on hot dogs, but I am too wiki-retarded to get the barnstars right. But I definately second the awarding of a barnstar to you for your work. youngamerican (talk) 17:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do, however, give you a shoutout on my user page. youngamerican (talk) 17:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fair use

A week or so ago you wrote on Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/Ta_bu_shi_da_yu_2:

Every single newspaper, magazine, television program and other form of media grapple with issues of copyright, trademark and application of fair use principles - and they sometimes screw up. That doesn't make them any of them "questionably legal"...

That was a very nicely nuanced argument, which I only just now got to. Thank you. —Steve Summit (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bath disaster

If you can't view any edits in the history, you need to force refresh the history page, by pressing CTRL+F5. All I deleted were vandalisms and their reversions. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-03-23 01:05

Congrats on surviving the main page

Just wanted to send a big congrats on you and your article having surviving the main page experience with your sanity intact and your article still great! --Alabamaboy 15:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Idit Harel Caperton/archive1

I have posted a request for peer review for the above article. I have always valued your opinion on all topics related to Wikipedia and humbly ask that you take a look and offer up any comments/criticisms/concerns that you may have. Cheers. youngamerican (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lakeside Mall

You seem to be one of the movers and shakers behind the Lakeside Mall article. I was considering starting a deletion process on the thing (nothing personal), but I wanted to discuss it with you first. I explain my reasons in a little more detail on the article's talk page, but to be brief, I don't understand why that particular shopping mall deserves its own article. The description of the mall in the article makes it seem like nothing more than a typical (albeit somewhat large) suburban shopping mall. The article doesn't mention anything noteworthy that's happened there and there doesn't seem to be a superlative associated with the mall. It's not a biggest, tallest, most anything as far as I can tell. Is there a really good reason that this mall is more deserving of an article than almost every other mall in America? If there is the article doesn't make it seem that way. Rhesusman 02:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article is very well-written. But that doesn't speak to its significance. You did mention the role of the mall in revitalizing the local economy and the fact that it was the largest in the state for twenty years. If that's the source of the mall's significance, why is it not in the article? As it stands, a typical reader not familiar with the Detroit area is going to read this article and see an article about a shopping mall that's not all that special. Rhesusman 06:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's better to add to wikipedia than remove. I can see that you're an active contributor - more so than I am - and I respect that (I'm a law student so I don't have as much time to be as active in the wikipedia community as I would like). However, I would be of the mind that just being well-written is not in and of itself enough to make an article encyclopedic. Not everything belongs in wikipedia. I came upon the article by chance, it struck me as unencyclopedic and not sufficiently significant. You've persuaded me otherwise - when I said "why is it not in the article" I meant to suggest that you should add this stuff. That's why I tried to do the courteous thing and ask you before listing it on AfD. I may have not have been correct to say the article didn't belong, but I don't think I've behaved out of line. I didn't think this article was that big of a deal; just something worth pointing out. Like I said I wasn't trying to make this personal and you didn't have to snap at me. Rhesusman 13:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of us are working on setting guidelines for indoor shopping malls. Check out User:Youngamerican/Indoor shopping malls and chip in your thoughts, if you wish. youngamerican (talk) 14:06, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bath School disaster vctims

Thought you might want to see this. youngamerican (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Ford

Gerald Rudolph Ford, Jr. (born July 14, 1913) was the 40th (1973–1974) Vice President and the 38th (1974–1977) President of the United States. Ford obtained his bachelors degree from the University of Michigan and law degree from Yale University before serving in the United States Navy during World War II. In 1948, Republican Ford defeated the incumbent in the party primary and was elected to the United States House of Representatives representing the Grand Rapids, Michigan area and elected House Minority Leader in 1963. When Spiro Agnew resigned, Ford was appointed Vice President. Following the resignation of Richard Nixon, Ford ascended to the presidency on August 9, 1974. The Ford administration saw the withdrawal of American forces from Vietnam, the execution of the Helsinki Accords and the continuing specter of inflation and recession. After Ford was criticized by many for granting a pardon to Nixon, Democrat Jimmy Carter narrowly defeated Ford in the 1976 presidential race. Ford is the nation's only President who was elected to neither the Presidency nor Vice Presidency.

Detroit, Michigan

Nice work with the Detroit article so far. However, I ask that at the moment you refrain from working on the government and culture sections since I am now in the middle of prepping the contents for their own articles and summarizing the material in the Detroit article (which will hopefully bring the article close to the 45 kB mark if it is to be readied for the FA process). If you want, you can look at my work on my user page (under Desk) and comment on anything that needs to be done. Thanks. Pentawing^Talk 04:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The main problem concerning article size comes about when the article is nominated for FA. From my experience in getting city articles featured (Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Boston, Massachusetts), there are some people (notably Nichalp) who insist that during FA candidacy an article should not go over a certain size. These people, I should note, are well respected by the Wikipedia community, and whenever they speak up everyone listens. For instance, the Boston article was 45 kB when it achieved FA and since then its size has increased to more than 50 kB. Nobody cares about an article's size once it achieves FA (so far I haven't seen an article's large size being the basis of a FA removal), but where it counts is during the nomination process. The idea I am working with is that these major problems must be resolved first so that when the FA process does come along the only objections raised will be those that are easy to resolve (rather than objections that can kill a nomination).

As for the images, the one for the Detroit Medical Center can just be one of the major hospitals (I am not looking for an aerial shot). My concern is that many of the current images do not show a street level view of the city (many are skyline shots). As for the urban prairie, the idea is to show that much of the city is abandoned, though that could be countered with an image of a major redevelopment project (e.g. Campus Martius or the GM Riverfront). At the same time, we should try to avoid using copyrighted images that require fair-use rationale as much as possible and stick to GFDL-licensed or public domain images (remember Carnildo who objected to several images for the Michigan State Capitol because they were copyrighted?). Hope these explanations help. Pentawing^Talk 03:00, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to change the listing of needed images to address some of your concerns (e.g. instead of "urban prairie," "abandoned sections" will be used). Secondly, since you mentioned article size, I am hoping that if Detroit is nominated for FA that the users I mentioned will not suddenly show up to object to the article. But I am playing it safe and will have the modified sections readied around this Sunday. Pentawing^Talk 06:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I finally got the new summaries into the article and created sub-articles out of the previous material (these actions reduced the article's size down to 50kB). Nevertheless, there is one image that I am unsure about (Image:Detroit2003pics foto.jpg), given that it is copyrighted. Could you be able to give a fair-use justification for this image (I am wary of using such images if a freely licensed image is available). As a side note (in case you were wondering), I removed the SMART logo since I am now in the process of finally creating an article for it. Please let me know if you have issues with the new summaries. Pentawing^Talk 03:56, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you said "the contrast is rather dramatic and may enhance its chances to gain featured status," are you referring to the Chicago article? Personally, I don't believe the Chicago article will achieve FA this time around (from what I know, this is the fourth attempt at FA. New York City was nominated twice, and one major complaint I saw was size, or rather bloated size). Anyways, I am keeping the Detroit article on peer review for at least a month, so there isn't any need to worry about FA nomination at the moment. Pentawing^Talk 02:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image, though right now we should focus on content rather than images. I recently asked Taxman to look at the article and give some suggestions. He has given some useful suggestions that we should start working on. Pentawing^Talk 21:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Alpha

I was referred to use the article History of Michigan State University during peer review as an example on improving Alpha Phi Alpha as Feature Article Candidate. I used your quote boxes and during FAC, admin Tuf-Kat made the comment that these are unencyclopedic. I informed him that this quote boxes appear in a current feature article, so why was my use unencyclopedic. That's why he has removed your quotes, and he's assuming that the boxes were added after the article received Feature Article status. Do you know if the boxes were there during the review? Also, can you review my article and provide input. thanks and sorry for bringing unwanted attention to your article. Ccson 03:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can visibly see the improved changes for the article after your initial copyedits. thanks so much, Carl. Ccson 15:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tuf-Kat said it needed "massive copyedit", so I'm glad to see a new pair of eyes. I hope this article makes it pass FAC and you can add this to your list of articles you have augmented. Good luck on the trial. Ccson 22:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have really done an exceptional job in less than 24 hours in improving this article 100%+. Thank you so much!! Ccson 03:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The barnstar is in the bag; I'm going to also make you an unofficial honoary member of the fratnerity.

Good morning. I also updated some info regarding the infamous "brown paper bag" test. thanks for your npov. Ccson 13:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I read the source regarding the fraternity's composition being mainly african-american. I don't disagree with this, however; after reading the article 3 times, I still don't see the source to verify the statement in the article. Ccson 14:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The last footnote has a 1950 version of the History of Alpha Phi Alpha. Do you have a copy of this book or know where one can be located? The group is looking for relics of the past for a planned exhibit at the August Genereal Convention. Ccson 14:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take your lead on this since you haven't led me wrong thus far. Once again, thanks for all the great copyedit, NPOV and advice you provided. The article now contains "brilliant prose" due your contributions. I'll see you in a week. Ccson 13:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added 3 new pictures and removed the picture of the Sphinx Magazine and its purpose. I want your opinion on the three added in the history section, their quality and appropriateness. You can revert back if you like, and/or rearrange to your liking. Ccson 07:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I renonimated the article as a FAC. Hopefully you'll be able to add to your growing list of articles on your user page. Ccson 13:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar and for your brilliant prose, expansion of the footnotes and for working with the FAC reviewers. Don't forget to add this article to your user page as one that you have put in a lot of effort to get to Feature Article Status. Ccson 15:15, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raul has been working on the introductory paragraph for Alpha Phi Alpha. I think he getting it ready for the featured article during the July 25 week which coincides with the 100th anniversary. Thanks so much all the work you provided. I'm a better wikipedian from watching your contributions. I hope you're enjoying a wonderful summer. Ccson 03:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say hello; Hello.--Ccson 15:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit Neighborhood articles

A new editor has recently added quite a few articles on Detroit neighborhoods & roads (see my list here User:Isotope23/To Do). The content of these articles is such that they need a complete rewrite. I'm going to prod or redirect the roads, but I'm undecided about the neighborhoods. I wan to keep the articles, but I'd like to come up with a naming convention then do a rewrite. Since I've noticed that you and User:Pentawing take a stron interest in the Detroit article, I figured you might have some useful feedback (or might want to do some article cleanup).--Isotope23 13:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about doing that, but leaving a few of the notable neighborhoods as standalones (Corktown, Greektown, Mexicantown, Indian Village). That's why I love Detroit: slap an ethnicity on it and end it with "town"... you've got yourself a neighborhood!--Isotope23 18:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

http://newpsm.profsurv.com/newpsm/archive.php?issue=90&article=1265

Reminder

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

— Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toledo War

Sure, I'll have a look, though I am quite busy this week outside Wikipedia. Pentawing^Talk 02:40, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I know this is old business (from April 2, to be precise), but thanks for the barnstar! I didn't notice it until now in my subpage. Thanks, though, and congrats again on getting Gerald Ford to FA! Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know! Flcelloguy (A note?) 23:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Charlton Press

Thanks for your edit to Charlton Press. It is a Canadian company with no connection to Charlton Comics. TruthbringerToronto 13:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MRO references

Mmm.. but to avoid duplicate references, doesn't it make more sense to only include the references in the most appropriate article? In this case the RAD750.. if you think a citation is needed, then surely one should add it to that article, not the MRO one? Mlm42 13:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MRO stuff

Looking at the Science Peer Review, it doesn't look like it's even very active or anything... But, I guess it's certainly worth a shot. Thanks for the help! Tuvas 16:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

-- Malber (talk • contribs) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

Detroit, Michigan - Trade

I read through the article. If you wish, you can reinsert the passage along with the source. However, if I were the one to reinsert the passage, I would prefer using another source such as the Detroit Chamber of Commerce, the U.S. Department of Commerce, or Statistics Canada. Pentawing^Talk 02:43, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge of ketchup on hot dogs

I was wondering what your objections were to the merging of ketchup on hot dogs into the hot dog article, and was hoping you would join the discussion on Talk:Ketchup on hot dogs. JDoorj a m Talk 18:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup Taskforce

I've added Mayerling to your desk. Hunterd is also working on the article, and is proposing a split of the article. It would be great if you could pop in and help as well. Thanks --K e rowyn ^{Leave a note} 08:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC00437-det.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC00437-det.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Urban prairie

I recently came across Urban prairie and the pictures that you'd posted there. Do you have more? How about higher resolution versions. This is absolutely fascinating -- I'd love to see the article flushed out (much like the blog posts, though with a tone suitable for Wikipedia) and more pictures. If not, there's always the possibility of taking them -- if you live in Detroit, that is. Well, thanks for posting the ones you did! (I'm going to relay the same message to the author of the detroit blog, once I find his/her email address) --Zantastik talk 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC00441-det.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC00441-det.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.

Gerald Ford FAR

Gerald Ford has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Thanks again for your help in 2006 with the Alpha Phi Alpha article. I've made many changes so please feel to review and correct anything that's not brilliant prose.--Ccson 15:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?

Are you still around? youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 04:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1101670804 400.jpg

Hello, Jtmichcock. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1101670804 400.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Jtmichcock/Sandbox. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alphapledges.jpg

Hello, Jtmichcock. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Alphapledges.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Jtmichcock/Sandbox. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:BathSchoolMuseumflag.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BathSchoolMuseumflag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bryan 09:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Freep masthead logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Freep masthead logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:H51-2b.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:H51-2b.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:24, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:342647.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:342647.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 06:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:1569802815.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1569802815.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. [[User:Fpt|Fpt <sup>[[User talk:Fpt|Talk]]</sup>]] 16:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Velvet Jones.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Velvet Jones.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Xuxa xuxa118.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Xuxa xuxa118.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tbsd-201.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tbsd-201.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tbsd-205.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tbsd-205.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tbsd-303.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tbsd-303.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tbsd-501.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tbsd-501.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:50, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Goat_greatlife.jpg

I have tagged Image:Goat_greatlife.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 16:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Alphas

The article List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers has been nominated a Featured lists. Please see List of Alpha Phi Alpha brothers to provide comments and/or Support of the nomination.--Ccson 15:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:HUNK a.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:HUNK a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Angr 17:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HUNK a.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HUNK a.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Security Council.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Security Council.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sebvdv 10:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1101670804_400.jpg

I have tagged Image:1101670804_400.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 02:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan State Capitol FAR

Michigan State Capitol has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Epbr123 22:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GTmasthead.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GTmasthead.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 19:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Repub8a.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Repub8a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG ² 03:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Motown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Motown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mayorkwame.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mayorkwame.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Battlestarpegasus.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Battlestarpegasus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CaptainRixx.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CaptainRixx.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo the palm.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Logo the palm.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:1101060130 400.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1101060130 400.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:Ddotlogo.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Image:Moffatts.jpg

I have tagged Image:Moffatts.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Barristers poster small.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barristers poster small.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bronners.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bronners.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Murphy gumby2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Murphy gumby2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License for Image:Hilberry.jpg

The image Hilberry.jpg is a candidate to be copied to the Wikimedia Commons. When you uploaded this image, you licensed it for use under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). On behalf of the Wikipedia and Commons communities, thank you.

You also chose a license tag which adds disclaimers to the GFDL. As explained at Wikipedia:GFDL standardization, these disclaimers cause certain re-use problems that make the GFDL less free than it could be.

Before I copy this image to the Commons, I wanted to ask whether you would be willing to remove the disclaimers from your GFDL tag. No one other than you may legally alter the license. If you do choose to modify the license on this image, I respectfully recommend any of the following best-practices license tags:

{{GFDL}}
{{GFDL-self}}
{{GFDL-user}} using the syntax {{GFDL-user|YOURUSERNAME}}
{{self}} multilicense using the syntax {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

You are under no obligation whatsoever to alter the license. Doing so merely cooperates with those members of the community who believe that disclaimers in individual media are undesirable. Wikipedia consensus still allows GFDL licenses with disclaimers, as does the Commons.

Whether or not you choose to remove the disclaimers, thank you for your consideration.

Please also see Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons for more information. This message was placed using Template:License disclaimer notice.

Thanks! --Ipoellet (talk) 00:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Normally I'd wait longer before deciding a contributor had declined to remove the disclaimers from their GFDL. But I see that you haven't had any Wikipedia activity for over a year, so I'm guessing you won't see this request. If I'm wrong, I apologize. Meanwhile, I'm proceeding to copy the Hilberry image over to the Commons, and if you do elect to remove the disclaimers from the license in the future, please remember to do so over at the Commons. Thanks! --Ipoellet (talk) 18:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The new image name over at the Commons is Image:Hilberry Theatre WSU - Detroit Michigan.jpg. Thanks again! Ipoellet (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:UNCF logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:UNCF logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:4a22542r.jpg

Image:4a22542r.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Cadillac Assembly Plant Amsterdam Street historic - Detroit Michigan.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Cadillac Assembly Plant Amsterdam Street historic - Detroit Michigan.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1101670804 400.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1101670804 400.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Coneyhd.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Coneyhd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:1569802815.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:1569802815.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pais (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Ford FAR

I have nominated Gerald Ford for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michigan House.gif and File:Senate michigan.jpg

Tags have been placed on File:Michigan House.gif and File:Senate michigan.jpg requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the pages that have been nominated for deletion (File:Michigan House.gif, File:Senate michigan.jpg) (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk pages (File talk:Michigan House.gif, File talk:Senate michigan.jpg) explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tags yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yassie (talk) 03:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Detroitlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Detroitlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brian K. Zahra

Please remember that all biographies of living people must have reliable sources. Corvus cornix_talk 00:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kewl. Gracias. :) Corvus cornix_talk 01:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Brian K. Zahra

On 2 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brian K. Zahra, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Brian K. Zahra was appointed to the Michigan Supreme Court by Governor Rick Snyder to replace Maura Corrigan leaving Republicans with a 4–3 majority on the court? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diary-X

You were one of the editors who voted to keep Diary-X the last time it came up for deletion. It's been unsourced since it was created in 2005, and has been tagged since 2009. If no sources can be found it should probably be stubbed, since the material in there must all come from someone's personal knowledge rather than reliable sources. If you can do anything to improve it then now's the time. Will Beback talk 03:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NBLSA.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NBLSA.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:H27-3b.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:H27-3b.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your very fine work on the Bath School disaster article, which I will use from here forward for inspiration Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Seven Architects.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Seven Architects.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Main page

Looks like one of your articles will be on the Main page soon, - your chance to polish blurb and article, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jtmichcock

Do you have an interest in Gerald Ford?

Then maybe you might have an interest in joining WikiProject Gerald Ford! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the life, career, and presidency of Gerald Ford.

We're very much a new project, so you have the opportunity to help form the design and structure of the WikiProject itself in addition to creating and improving content about Ford. You are more than welcome to join us by adding your username under the "Participants" section of our WikiProject page. Everyone is welcome, and you are free to contribute where and when you like.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask a member, and we'll be happy to help you. Hopefully we'll see you around the WikiProject!

You received this invitation in view of your significant contributions to the Gerald Ford article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of Michigan State University FAR

I have nominated History of Michigan State University for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BathSchoolMuseumflag2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BathSchoolMuseumflag2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jtmichcock. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:800px-Eight Mile Road-fixed.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:800px-Eight Mile Road-fixed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jtmichcock. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Woodward Avenue, Detroit (circa 1910).jpg

The file File:Woodward Avenue, Detroit (circa 1910).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of British Columbia Country Music Association

The article British Columbia Country Music Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no sourcing found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Battlestarpegasus.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Battlestarpegasus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Michigan State Capitol

I have nominated Michigan State Capitol for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 17:43, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]