User talk:Jshusain

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for starting with ANTH 2501 on Wikipedia! Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 18:51, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jshusain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DreamFieldArts (talk) 02:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for editing my article! :) PBArcaro (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critic

The first line of the article should be removed as it is loaded with bias. The article is well organized and your contributions to the problems and pressures of resource exploitation no doubt strengthen the article. Your addition of 'developing countries' is important, but perhaps use a different term. The global north and global south are terms that are much more politically correct. Also, it would have strengthened the article if you were to add a section on the global north because realistically we are the benefactors of the global south's exploited resources. It would have been a worthwhile addition if you were to include societies that have met their end because of resource exploitation. The Mayans and Easter Island inhabitants are quintessential examples. Going hand and hand with this is the use of modern day technology to exploit resources on previously inconceivable scales. Technology is an important part of resource exploitation and the addition of the heading would have improved the article greatly. Overall though you improved this article significantly. Mta.crk (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]