User talk:DreamFieldArts

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

New messages appear at the bottom of this page.

Archives

Archive 1

You say that you've uploaded "My company's logo"; so this is apparently a company account

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of what username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 18:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DreamFieldArts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It isn't a real company. I made it up myself just as a username.

Decline reason:

Per sockpuppetry concerns below. Max Semenik (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DreamFieldArts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it wasn't sockputtrey i never use the account this is unfair. I was in the wrong account!!! cut me a break this one time please!!!! DreamFieldArts^Talk 23:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Denied. It appears you have a number of accounts in addition to User:Tricdl27 (which I've just blocked) and User:Lazlo1657. Please appeal from your main account only, that is, whichever one (1) you intend to use henceforth. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Then why did you describe File:DreamFA.png as "My company's logo"?[1] --AussieLegend (talk) 15:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I really don't, probably because I wasn't thinking. DreamFieldArts^Talk 15:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also it isn't even a company, and because it is not I should be unblocked. DreamFieldArts^Talk 17:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using another account to evade a block is unwise.[2] --AussieLegend (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As is blatant sockpuppetry.[3][4] Using two separate accounts to make controversial edits to an article within 3 minutes of each other is highly suspicious. --AussieLegend (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is not evading, if you read above it says make a new account. DreamFieldArts^Talk 20:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't create a new account though, Tricdl27 has existed since September 2011, DreamFieldArts has existed since February 2012 and used them both together in a very sockpuppet manner, as indicated above.[5][6] --AussieLegend (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought i was using DFA guess not...i havent been using tricdl27 at all lately DreamFieldArts^Talk 21:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you make a lot of excuses for your actions. This is no different. In addition to the links I've provided above, in which you made two controversial edits to the article within 3 minutes of each other using the two different accounts, you also made this edit as Tricdl27, one hour after DreamFieldArts stating "I agree with DFA", which was clearly an attempt at making it look like you were two different editors, one supporting the other. Or did you think you were using DreamFieldArts to throw in a vote of support for DreamFieldArts' comments? --AussieLegend (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably throw a vote. kk? DreamFieldArts^Talk 21:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Back to the original issue, DFA, there needs to be some explanation of what was in your mind at the time. Perhaps it is a company you hope to form? Perhaps upon being pressed for a file description you copied some other file's template? On the other hand, Mike, have you any actual evidence that Dreamfield or DreamFieldArts is in fact a company? Nonetheless, it certainly does seem a plausible company name. As for using two accounts in the same issue, that's something you must have known was not allowable. I'd like to hear your explanation for it. DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding DGG. DreamFieldArts was a film company I wanted to make when I was making a movie for Sundance. But the making of that film never happened, so I use it as my username everywhere. The company was originally called DreamField Studios in 1997 but I changed it to arts in 2003 but I never registered it or anything because I wasn't 100% sure it was going to be a company. So no it is not a company. When I first started using wikipedia, I had the account "tricdl27" and then i liked to use the DFA name so I made an account. On my computer I have google chrome, which I never use but the times where is says the signature tricdl27 is when i was in chrome by accident as I make all my edits in firefox. I hope this clears up the confusion. I know having two accoudns is not allowed but i never noticed i was using it. I had to use it today to contact you. DreamFieldArts^Talk 23:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, this isn't the first time Tricdl27 has been caught socking. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 23:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DreamFieldArts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

just block tricdl27 and unblock DFA DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia:Username policy prohibits usernames that represent companies, web sites, organizations, groups, etc., regardless of whether the company name is registered. If it were unblocked, another admin would likely block it again as a username policy violation. Notwithstanding the sockpuppetry issue, this request is declined based on the username. Sorry, you have to come up with something else. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lazlo whatever wasn't me i know that. and block tricdl27 and unblock dfa DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser evidence shows Lazlo, and a few other accounts, all using the same computer. How many accounts have you used in the past or currently, and what are their names? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tricdl27 and dreamfieldarts. DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seen it but thanks. All i want is DFA to be unblocked. DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are other accounts you haven't yet named. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:20, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry and samaerospace...that is it 100% positive. samaerospace was sort of a sandbox DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely sure that's it? Also, why did you create this many accounts when (as has been pointed out) you were already brought to SPI once? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DFA was my main. tricdl was my main before i had dfa. samaero was a test DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, can I just be unblocked. DreamFieldArts^Talk 00:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What about Lazlo1657? What was its function? Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 00:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was never my account DreamFieldArts^Talk 01:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then why was it used from your computer? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 01:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know but I have never made an account with that name, possibly someone used my computer at work idk. DreamFieldArts^Talk 01:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me, this will never happen again. DreamFieldArts^Talk 01:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 01:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the hell lazlo is stop this now, i dont like to be framed. DreamFieldArts^Talk 01:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DreamFieldArts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok so i can't have the company type one, can you unblock SamAerospace and let me use that? DreamFieldArts^Talk 01:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have unfortunately lost the trust of the community due to violations of policies that you were previously aware of. I still do not believe that you have come clean about all of your WP:SOCK violations, and that is unacceptable. Now you have the nerve to ask for the unblock of an account that has a name that clearly violates our username policy. You have no regard for the policies and community norms on Wikipedia, nor any desire to work within the framework. I recommend playing those games elsewhere until you decide you're ready to contribute accordingly (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want SamAerospace unblocked you really need to ask from that account. As for all of the computers in your house being on the same IP, WP:LITTLEBROTHER still applies. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your idea, i shall put it there, as little brother seems foolish it makes sense. peace DreamFieldArts^Talk 01:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone place the {{retired}} on all of my user pages because I am unable to. Thanks i am going to have a cleanstart in a few months DreamFieldArts^Talk 16:42, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're not retired though. You've effectively been fired. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:44, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I too think that a period away from Wikipedia would help to regain perspective. DGG ( talk ) 17:32, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, this guy has been off for like three months, why don't we let him back on and see how he does. Obtund 12:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Him"? Don't you mean "me"? --AussieLegend (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait you are this guy? I thought you weren't suppose to have an account? Obtund 15:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DreamFA.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DreamFA.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi DreamFieldArts,

I would like to redirect the content from the URL:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Primiani

To

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joey_Primiani

As "Joey" is the proper wikipedia page. It is also the same person to merge the pages.

Thank you!

-Sextor77 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sextor77 (talk • contribs) 06:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gatekeeperlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gatekeeperlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Totie (talk) 02:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]