User talk:Jrpmd1221

Hello, AACoExec, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 03:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Steuart Pittman, from its old location at User:AACoExec/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:37, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "AACoExec", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steuart Pittman (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Firstly, based on your username I need to advise you to familiarize yourself with our conflict of interest rules. I don't exactly know if you are Steuart Pittman, or if you're someone else who works in his office, but either way you have no business starting a Wikipedia article about yourself or someone you know personally.
Secondly, county executive is not a level of office that passes our notability standards for politicians. The lowest level of office that guarantees somebody a Wikipedia article is the state legislature -- at the county or city levels, nobody gets an automatic entitlement to have a Wikipedia article just because they exist, but rather notability is strictly conditional on the volume and depth and range of media coverage that the person can show.
The only reference here that represents a reliable source is a cursory acknowledgement of Steuart Pittman winning an election within an article that isn't about him, so it's not evidence of his notability at all. To be eligible for an article on here, Steuart Pittman needs to be the subject of a lot more media coverage than just one brief mention in one news article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steuart Pittman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steuart Pittman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AACoExec! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Steuart Pittman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Steuart Pittman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.aacounty.org/departments/county-executive/bio/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bri.public (talk) 16:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Steuart Pittman

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Steuart Pittman, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.aacounty.org/departments/county-executive/bio/index.html https://www.equusfoundation.org/news/releases/news-release-407.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Steuart Pittman and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Steuart Pittman, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Steuart Pittman. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Steuart Pittman with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Steuart Pittman saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Bri.public (talk) 19:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing on Wikipedia

Hello Jrpmd1221. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Steuart Pittman, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jrpmd1221. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jrpmd1221|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:43, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Steuart Pittman

Firstly, you were already advised the first time that it is not your prerogative to simply move your own work from draftspace into articlespace yourself. Especially as a person with a direct conflict of interest with regard to Steuart Pittman, you must submit your work for an AFC review, and may not simply make your own decisions about whether it's "ready for prime time or not".

Secondly, you were also already advised that politicians who hold office at the local (county, city, etc.) level are not automatically considered notable just because they exist. In order to get into Wikipedia, Steuart Pittman would have to be demonstrated as significantly more notable than the heads of most other county governments in the United States, by virtue of getting much wider coverage than the norm. The fact that you can show a handful of purely local coverage in the local media is not enough to get a county executive in the door, because every county executive in every county can always show a handful of purely local coverage in the local media. So to make Steuart Pittman notable enough for inclusion here, you would need to be able to show that his coverage was nationalizing significantly beyond just Anne Arundel County's local media.

Yes, it's true that some of his predecessors in the same role do have Wikipedia articles — but they don't have articles because they served as county executive in Anne Arundel, they have articles because they served in the state legislature at other times in their political careers. So Steuart Pittman is not automatically entitled to have an article just because some of the other people in the list do have articles — the ones who have articles have other notability claims besides Anne Arundel county council, and the ones for whom Anne Arundel county council is the peak of their notability do not have articles at all.

And no, filing an OTRS permission to cover off the copyright issue does not in and of itself exempt him from still having to clear our notability and sourcing standards in the first place, either. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steuart Pittman (June 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bearcat was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As was explained to you the first time, county executives are not automatically notable. To make Steuart Pittman notable enough for a Wikipedia article, it is not enough to just show a handful of local media sources which verify that he exists -- you would need to show sources which demonstrate that he is significantly more notable than most other county executives in the United States, such as sources which nationalize significantly beyond just his own local media market. (For example, a county executive in Maryland would have a strong claim of notability if he were so prominent that he was getting media coverage in New York City and Chicago and Los Angeles -- but he does not have a strong claim of notability if his coverage is exclusively Annapolis/Baltimore/Washington.
His predecessor Steve Schuh does not have an article because he was a county executive in Anne Arundel, he has an article because he served in the state legislature from 2007 to 2014 before becoming county executive -- so the fact that he has an article does not mean Steuart Pittman automatically gets one too, because they don't have equivalent notability claims.

Bearcat (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Steuart Pittman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Steuart Pittman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Steuart Pittman

Hello, Jrpmd1221. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steuart Pittman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]