User talk:Joy78/sandbox2
Peer Review
[edit]The Lead: The lead to this article is very short and general. It tells you exactly what the article will be about, but it is pretty brief. I think it could be a little longer and more detailed. Maybe bring some information from the historical context section of the article. I believe that the entire presence of baroque architecture in the Philippines is due to Spanish missionaries is an important fact that should be in the lead.
A clear Structure: Yes, this article has a very clear structure and is very well organized. I really like the historical context section at the beginning. This is a good alternative to trying to fit all of this information somewhere in each of the subsequent sections.
Balancing: All of the sections in this article are well balanced. They all contain information essential to the topic, none of them are unnecessary, or off topic. There does not appear to be any viewpoints left out, but of course topics can always be expanded. I do not know anything about this topic so I can not really say if there is truly is anything left out or not. This article is purely informative, there are no conclusions drawn and it is not trying to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view. There is no way someone could draw any sort of biased conclusion from this article, it is completely neutral.
Neutral Content: I do not feel like the author is writing from any sort of perspective, they are only writing to inform. There are no words or phrases that don't feel neutral. It doesn't focus on any part of the information too much or too little.
Reliable Sources: All of the statements made in the article appear to be backed up by reliable sources. I noticed that each of the sections appears to be only linked to one source, it may be beneficial for the author to use more than one source for each section, even if the source was reliable. There seemed to be a lot of information just dependent on one viewpoint. Apart from that, everything is great!