User talk:Jossyluv

This is Jossyluv's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Jossyluv/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Jossyluv/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jossyluv! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links and citations

Hi Jossyluv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I noticed a few issues with some of your edits, and wanted to share some relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines with you:

External links guideline: External links should generally not be placed in the body of an article, and there are limits and guidelines for the types of external links that should be added to articles.
Linking Manual of Style: Avoid wikilinking commonly understood terms (called overlinking). Also, make sure it is clear what page the linked text goes to. For example, you linked the word "page" to the PageRank, but those are different topics, and would confuse readers who expected to go to a page about "pages"
Verifiability policy and reliable sourcing guideline: If you're adding a source, make sure it is reliable. Also, make sure that it supports the text you're using it as a citation for. The text on Wikipedia should be a direct summary of the cited source, without editorialization.

Please let me know if you have any questions. If you haven't seen it already, Help:Introduction is a great tutorial for contributing to Wikipedia. Best, Politanvm ^talk 15:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jossyluv, one other thing to be aware of is the "minor edit" checkbox. The checkbox is only meant for things that don't change the meaning of an article at all, like fixing typos or reverting vandalism. Things like adding sources or external links wouldn't be considered minor. You can read more about it at Help:Minor. Best, Politanvm ^talk 17:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Solna Municipality. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 23:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks Jossyluv (talk) 08:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation science

I hate to have to tell you this, but any sources for the court decision need to discuss the actual decision, not the issues. Doug Weller talk 14:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Machine translation, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. As mentioned earlier on your talk page, the purpose of citation is to verify the claims in the article. A completely unrelated reference is not a valid citation. Even if it is from a related topic, it must back up the specific claim it follows. Politanvm ^talk 23:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You even changed a quotation because you didn't like its grammar

Doug Weller talk 08:56, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also don't understand our sourcing policy & are changing spellings that are correct

See WP:RS, WP:V and WP:ENGVAR - some articles use American spelling, some British, and you are changing spellings so they don't match variety of English used in the article. Doug Weller talk 09:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now l understand. Thanks Jossyluv (talk) 08:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 09:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jossyluv (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Jossyluv/sandbox

Hello, Jossyluv. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Jossyluv/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Jossyluv/sandbox

Hello, Jossyluv. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]