User talk:Joshuapark693

Recent article submission

Hello, Joshuapark693! I hope you are doing well. I noticed that you recently submitted an article for creation to Wikipedia main space. Please make sure you are familiar with our rules for such drafts. Thanks! :)

I hope you enjoy working on Wikipedia and decide to stick around! Professor Penguino (talk) 05:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Seawolf35 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: WP:NOTHOWTO and Wikipedia is not for advertising.

Seawolf35 ^T--C 07:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joshuapark693! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seawolf35 ^T--C 07:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chess.com Lessons (January 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 18:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joshuapark693 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to learn how to build an encyclopedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joshuapark693 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will try to make useful contributions instead

Decline reason:

Great. In your next unblock request, please say what sort of constructive contribution you want to make. Please give an actual example of a constructive edit. PhilKnight (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joshuapark693 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to make numbers

Decline reason:

This does not do as PhilKnight requested, and I don't even understand what you mean. Phil asked for an actual example of an edit you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joshuapark693 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to make an article about number properties

Decline reason:

Per below, although frankly the excessively laconic nature of these requests was almost argument enough ... who'd ever imagine that someone could go too far in the other direction from WP:TLDR and WP:TEXTWALL?

I would also add that this is fourth declined request in less than 24 hours. Good faith notwithstanding, if there is another one like this in the near future talk-page access revocation should seriously be considered. — Daniel Case (talk) 10:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To any reviewing admin this edit re: numbers inspires no more confidence than their unblock requests Star Mississippi 02:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi:. I think this editor is acting in good faith and just doesn't get some of our policies. Would it be possible for me to try and teach them the basics of editing and give them a second chance? Professor Penguino (talk) 03:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not inclined to unblock at this stage, but if another admin does, you're more than welcome to ty @Professor Penguino Star Mississippi 03:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely think the block should stay for a bit, maybe I could send them some helpful links in the meantime? Regards, Professor Penguino (talk) 03:41, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some helpful links and reading

Hello, Joshuapark693. I see that you have been blocked for your recent edits. If you want to be unblocked, I highly recommend doing some catching up with Wikipedia's rules. You can check out WP:Getting started to get some tips on editing.

You can check out our so-called "five pillars", which are our five most important rules. Remember to always be civil discussing with editors -- but you probably shouldn't have a problem with that. :)

When creating content for articles, always remember that Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information. Editors need to be careful not to insert their own opinions into articles and keep them fair and balanced, or as "no point-of-view" as possible. Objectivity is key.

When creating articles, and just adding content in general, remember that topics must fit the guidelines listed at WP:Notability. Check out WP:What Wikipedia is not for more info. Promotional content or ad-like content is also strongly discouraged.

You can read our manual of style for more information on formatting, dates, grammar, etc.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me!

Here some other helpful links:

Regards, Professor Penguino (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you unblock editing now because I will try to follow your policies Joshuapark693 (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to file another unblock request but I will try to follow your policies isn't going to cut it. Please either make a serious effort, or don't request one. Star Mississippi 01:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me NOW! Joshuapark693 (talk) 00:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to file a request. You have not done so in a month. Star Mississippi 01:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, give a reason an administrator should unblock you. Just saying "Now!!" is not a reason. Professor Penguino (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, oops Joshuapark693 (talk) 04:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to be unblocked, you can read the first few sections at Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. Professor Penguino (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the power to unblock you. I see that you want to follow Wikipedia policies, but you need to take some time to read up on our core policies. Professor Penguino (talk) 02:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joshuapark693 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me! Now!!

Decline reason:

I don't really think we're going to make any progress here. Once you're older and can follow the instructions you're given, make an unblock request via WP:UTRS. However, you'll have to read through the entirety of Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and Wikipedia:Appealing a block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Concern regarding User:Joshuapark693/sandbox

Hello, Joshuapark693. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Joshuapark693/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chess.com Lessons

Hello, Joshuapark693. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chess.com Lessons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chess.com Lessons

Hello, Joshuapark693. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Chess.com Lessons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:21, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]