User talk:Josh cant edit at all

I can’t edit

I’m a bit too confused Josh cant edit at all (talk) 18:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

K I’m good I think Josh cant edit at all (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Josh cant edit at all! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 00:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for coming to my talk page! I have been learning the Editing system at Wikipedia through sandbox and going into random pages to look what is there. But I sure will look at the tea house Josh cant edit at all (talk) 01:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note

A lot of the edits you're marking as minor are on the border between minor and not-minor, and some are definitely not minor. Please check out Help:Minor edits, which says A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. So something like this edit, which changed the displayed name of an entity, should not be marked as minor. (Also, why did you remove those {{nowrap}} templates?)

It never hurts to err on the side of not marking as minor, especially when you're a new editor. When in doubt, best to leave the box unchecked. Thanks. :) -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 22:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the minor thing, but about the nowwrap stuff I don’t understand why they would block the links of the predecessor and why they would just link republic instead of “republic of China” if they already shortened it Josh cant edit at all (talk) 00:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I don't know a huge amount about infobox formatting, or about the specifics of our style guide for infoboxes, so I don't want to give you the wrong advice. I suggest you ask at The Teahouse, to make sure you're not doing anything that goes against our style guide. (And yes, if you didn't know, we have a style guide, called the Manual of Style. There's also a shorter version for learning the basics.) -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 00:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will look at the tea house - Josh cant edit at all (talk) 00:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Josh cant edit at all! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:37, Monday, May 17, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

On answering questions at the Teahouse

Hi, Josh. Glad to see you're settling in here! However, I wanted to share a concern about your recent answers at the Teahouse. This answer was bad advice. The article showed a number of issues, and AdmiralEek had already explained that to the person who posted. You're going to need a lot more experience before you can conclusively tell someone that their draft doesn't have problems; you especially shouldn't be saying that when a more experienced editor has already said that it does. Here, meanwhile, your advice was correct, but was just repeating what two editors had already said.

There's lots of experienced editors who volunteer at the Teahouse to give advice. Given that your account is less than a week old, I really don't think you have the necessary level of experience yet to be helping people. So in the future I'd encourage you to leave the question-answering to those more experienced editors and focus on the work you're doing improving articles. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 00:46, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: France–Lesotho relations has been accepted

France–Lesotho relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]