User talk:JoshKaine

This is JoshKaine's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FF Rarri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FF Rarri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoshKaine! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 05:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malik Shakir Aziz (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. Genius, Tidal, Upcoming are not acceptable or reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JoshKaine, Dan arndt, Noahfgodard, HitroMilanese, Ff rarri, and Kelvinjinxc: I moved FF Rarri back to Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz. It wouldn't survive a deletion discussion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malik Shakir Aziz. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 01:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any connection to FF Rarri?

The photo you uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, Commons:File:Wiki Rarri.jpg, looks professional. It appears to be a high-resolution version of an image the artists uses on SoundCloud[1]. If you have any connection to the artist at all, other than as someone who appreciates his work, you will need to be very careful when editing content about him on Wikipedia.

Please read the following pages regarding editors who have a "close connection" to the topics they cover: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, and Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Also familiarize yourself with these pages that every editor writing about musicians should be familiar with: Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Notability (people), Wikipedia:Notability (music) and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No Im Juat A Fan What Does This Article to be Accepted to the main page? in your opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshKaine (talk • contribs) 01:32, 7 September 2020 JoshKaine (UTC)

First, I'm not going to be doing a content-review of that article, it will need to wait for another reviewer. Second, on the Wikimedia Commons, you said the photograph was your own work, which suggests that you own the copyright to it. It's almost always the case that with professionally-taken photos, the copyright owner has some connection to the subject. There are exceptions of course. Sometimes artists will do professional poses for fans at events. The fact that it was nearly identical to a photo the artist is using for his own marketing made a very strong case that this photograph was taken by someone who is a friend, family member, or business associate of the artist. If that had been the case, then you would be considered to have a "conflict of interest" and possibly a "paid editing" relationship with the artist. Expect other editors to notice this and ask similar questions. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 13:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some basic Wikipedia help

When replying in a discussion like this one, it's customary to put your comment below the comment you are replying to.

It's also customary to add a colon (":") to the beginning of each line in your comment, including blank lines. This tells the Wikipedia software to indent your reply. If you are replying to a reply, add the same number of colons as the previous person, plus one more. Note: Sometimes, an asterisk ("*") is used instead of a colon. This will create a "bullet point" instead of a simple indent. If the person you are replying to uses an asterisk, use the same number the previous person did, plus one more.

Finally, it is customary to "sign" your comments using four tilde characters in a row ("~~~~").

Here's an example. Let's say you are the new user and I am welcoming you:

==Welcome==    ''This section header is placed automatically, don't mess with it''
Welcome to Wikipedia. ~~~~    ''placed by me on your talk page''
:Thank you. ~~~~    ''This is your reply, use a colon to indent''
::You are most welcome. ~~~~    ''This is my reply to your reply, I count your colons and add one more''
:Oh by the way, how do you upload a file? ~~~~    ''Later, you make a second reply to my original "Welcome" so you only use one colon''
::Go to the Wikimedia Commons at [[:Commons:Main Page]]. ~~~~    ''I reply to your question, again, with an additional colon.''

This is how it looks. Note: For technical reasons I'm not going to include the section header or the comments in italics, and for technical reasons the ~~~~ expands to MY signature with the current date and time. I will go back in a minute and change the signatures to have fake times and put in your name.

Welcome to Wikipedia. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. JoshKaine/(talk) 05:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 06:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh by the way, how do you upload a file? JoshKaine/(talk) 10:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the Wikimedia Commons at Commons:Main Page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 11:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is helpful. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 14:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (November 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Unbroken Chain was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Unbroken Chain (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blank help requests

Hi there, please don't add blank help requests, or duplicate help requests at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk as you did here, here, and here. The first one is fine, the other two are not constructive, as it just looks like you're mashing the help button. When you request help, ask a question, be patient, and when a volunteer has time, they will attempt to help you. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And if you are responding to a previous comment, write below the previous comment, and indent your reply with colons. This new help request is not going to get your issue addressed any faster. It's just likely to confuse a volunteer who may not notice that you've already opened a help request. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (January 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

CUPIDICAE💕 16:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (May 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No changes - pointless re-submit

KylieTastic (talk) 16:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FF Rarri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FF Rarri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FF Rarri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FF Rarri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FF Rarri (October 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Sources provided at best amount to blogs

S0091 (talk) 15:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rarri Dream (December 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by QuantumRealm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 17:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Rarri Dream

Draft:Rarri Dream, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rarri Dream and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Rarri Dream during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 04:38, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JoshKaine - What is your connection with Rarri Dream or FF Rarri? Your only edits in the past three years appear to have involved draft articles about them. If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it.

As User:SmokeyJoe says, do not edit archived or closed records of discussions.

Rarri Dream is not salted, and you may submit a new draft, provided that you declare any conflict of interest. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection to the artist I just thinks he deserves a wikipedia given he has press and news articles like I said If It isn't clear that deletion of the draft is the most appropriate way to deal with the resubmission then why has it been done. This is a legitimate up incoming music rapper which it says by his title on google he has many References they just have to be inserted correctly. If you put the draft back up I will assure that the excessive submissions won't happen again unless the page is ready and he has been posting on so really notable news outlets. He has also has had new press articles since then. JoshKaine (talk) 05:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 13:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JoshKaine (talk) 18:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JoshKaine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here JoshKaine (talk) 18:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC) I don’t understand why I am being blocked after I said, I have no connection with the subject Rarri Dream. They also are trying to say that I am the subject but I am not. I feel As Though I am being Treated unfairly because of my inexperience in editing. The Moderators are just doing what they want Not even justifying it. There is no way they can prove That I am the subject, or that I am connected in any way to the subject.I do admit that I submitted the subject’s draft too many times but now that I’m aware of what I was doing wrong it won’t happen again.[reply]

Decline reason:

If you say you aren't connected to them, okay- but editing about the same topic and nothing else for years is usually a big red flag regarding COI. Whether you are connected to this musician or not, you won't be permitted to further promote them, so we will need to know what edits you intend to make instead. Note that "rising" or "up and coming" musicians almost never merit articles- a musician must have already arrived and be noticed by independent reliable sources in order to recieve the significant coverage needed to summarize in an article. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.