User talk:Josephryanorr

Hello, Josephryanorr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 04:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Josephryanorr/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Josephryanorr/sandbox. Thanks! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michele S. Mirman has been accepted

Michele S. Mirman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:12, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First article BLP: seeking help bumping page from C to B rating

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello! I'm really excited to be contributing to Wikipedia. There's no better time than now to start. I'm currently editing a page that was published as a C and I'd like to try and get it to B rating. The page is 'Michele S Mirman'. Would any professional Wiki editors out there have the patience to help guide me a little? I'm new and trying my best to become better at this so I can continue creating more. LMK!

Thanks!

Josephryanorr (talk) 20:19, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The various WikiProjects have (not necessarily identical) quality criteria that are linked from the WikiProject banners on the talk page. For example, you can find those for WikiProject Law at Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/Assessment#Quality scale. At a glance I'd say the page's main shortcoming is that it relies very heavily on primary sources and sources that are not independent of the subject, such as the websites of organizations she is associated with - and all the secondary sources are merely local news. Then there's the problem that some information isn't sourced at all. A little more context also couldn't hurt: The article twice mentions that she won "the largest verdict [then] ever ($4M) for a female attorney on behalf of a rape victim" - but doesn't mention that she won it from the people who bungled installing the door locks. This incident in particular is one where I'd assume more than just local news should exist. Huon (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon and Huon:Thank you for all your advice! I'll have to get better sources to improve this article. Hopefully you get this.

@Huon: What information doesn't appear to be sourced at all? I'm curious, because I've done my best to cover everything as best as possible.

Which source mentions her marriage and surrounding details? Huon (talk) 22:46, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: I do not see any of that information in the Wiki - are you looking at an older version perhaps?

I assume we're talking about Michele S. Mirman? The infobox has a "Spouse(s)" entry that says, "Paul S. Mirman (m. 1980; died 2014)". There's no source, and as you noted it's not backed up by the body of the article either. Huon (talk) 16:10, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon:Hi again! I have an obituary for Paul Mirman, but I'm not sure how to add it to the Infobox. I tried, but it came out all wonky with a strange period before the URL :( the link to the obituary is here https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/nytimes/obituary.aspx?n=paul-s-mirman&pid=172608110&fhid=11947

What's the best way to go about inserting this reference? Is it OK to use an obituary as a reference? Sorry for all the questions...there are just a lot of rules to publishing on Wiki and I'm trying to understand them all. Thanks for your patience and help. - Joseph

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Josephryanorr, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Michele S. Mirman have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2019 (UTC) @Diannaa: Thank you! I'm going to track down the photographer who shot those images as well to see if I can get permission to use.[reply]

@Diannaa: I did some research and found a photographer that shoots photos for Michele. I spoke with him and he was more than happy to supply a photo of Michele with the appropriate CreativeCommons License. The photo is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MicheleSMirman2018.jpg - thanks again for cleaning this up. I'm going to follow your other guidelines and try to improve the entry.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anti-Money Laundering Improvement Act has been accepted

Anti-Money Laundering Improvement Act, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]