User talk:Joseph Rivero
This user is a student editor in Univeristy_of_Puerto_Rico_at_Cayey/INGL_3103_Intermediate_English_(Fall_Semester_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Joseph Rivero, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Knowledge society have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. jp×g 07:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Knowledge society, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Knowledge society, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:14, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Knowledge society Draft Article (Peer)
[edit]Hi Joseph! This is Melanie. I was the one in charge of reviewing your article. If I am not mistaken, you can verify the observations I made towards your draft. However, I would like to let you know that you are doing a great job. The draft has more content than the original article and the information added is interesting. Like I said in the peer review, if you want to add a new section about social knowledge in economy, you should do so. Another suggestion I made was to change the first sentence of your lead paragraph, since when I was reading it, it was somehow incomprehensible at first. Had to read it again in order to it. That being said, I recommend you to change that first sentence in a way that it does not change or alter the purpose and the context of the sentence. Other than that, the draft is going great. Keep going.Melanie.riveracolón (talk) 22:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)