User talk:Joseatienza

Welcome!

Hello, Joseatienza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ainsley Melham, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

i am jose segismundo atienza garcia is the dictator, and this is my page like Ferdinand Marcos Sr.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. SatDis (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tourism in Indonesia

The source says 169, in its very title. Any other number you add is original research. Either verify your assertion with a reliable source, or cease from making that addition/reversion. This is not optional. Thank you. El_C 11:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Graham. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rima Ostwani

Hello Joseatienza,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rima Ostwani for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- The9Man ^(Talk) 06:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Harvey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Natalie Morales and Ashley Graham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alejandra Andreu (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by EDG 543 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You must include multiple reliable sources independent from the subject. Please note that an article on this woman has been deleted once before (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anahi Hormazabal)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alejandra Andreu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alejandra Andreu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 01:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joseatienza! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 01:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alejandra Andreu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alejandra Andreu. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alejandra Andreu (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Add references to demonstrate notability. The draft is not going to accepted without inclusion of proper references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alejandra Andreu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alejandra Andreu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss International 2016, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Miss World 2023 has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.

This summary was inaccurate. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced material

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Miss World 2023, you may be blocked from editing. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bri, this user is still adding unsourced/poorly sourced content at Miss World 2023. Allyriana000 (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Allyriana000, this is not unsourced/poorly sourced but this is really sourced at miss world 2023 because Miss World 2023 will be held in India for the second time to host country after Miss World 1996 was held in India for the first time to host country that is true and i am not lying but please stop removing that marking the second time for the host country to stage the final thank you. Joseatienza (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there's a source for this then OK put it in. It looks unsourced. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits/summaries

Can you explain what "i am dictator like former filipino president Ferdinand Marcos Sr." is supposed to mean? And "i am the lawyer like Diana Harkusha"? DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 21:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes i am really dictator because i really like former president Ferdinand Marcos Sr.. Joseatienza (talk) 05:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are just an editor acting like a "dictator" despite having unsourced edits. Wikipedia is a friendly community of volunteers who are willing to share information with reliable source. If you re to continue with these actions, you are in danger of having your account blocked.

Have a nice day! Allyriana000 (talk) 11:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Miss World 2023. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you to stop edit-warring and start a talk page discussion but you simply continued and removed my talk page message. If this continues after this brief block is over, I will completely block you from editing this article. There are no exceptions for edit-warring because you think you are right and other editors are wrong. Disputes are resolved on article talk pages, not through reverting each other edits or insisting on your own version. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joseatienza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Miss World 2023 to be held in the United Arab Emirates, as well as in the Middle East for the first time is really true because Miss World President and Chief Executive Officer, Julia Morley was announced for Miss World 2023 but next time please do not remove that This was the first Miss World event to be held in the United Arab Emirates, as well as in the Middle East. in this article -> Miss World 2023 because of this read -> This was the first time China hosted the pageant. in this article -> Miss World 2003. Joseatienza (talk) 06:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 07:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Joseatienza (talk) 06:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi Joseatienza! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Miss World 2023 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Miss World 2023, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Bri. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Miss Teen USA 2023 in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

This was not a "grammar change". ☆ Bri (talk) 17:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miss World 2023. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not continue to restore unsourced information to the lead of this article. It must be sourced in the body per MOS:LEADCITE or sourced in situ. Sciencefish (talk) 09:55, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciencefish please do not remove that "This is the second time that Miss World pageant in India" it is true but i am not lying. @joseatienza (talk) 08:30 (PHT), 1 January 2024 Joseatienza (talk) 12:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciencefish this user dropped the f-word at me and has been continuously engaging in edit wars. Allyriana000 (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joseatienza,

Learn to work with other editors, especially those you disagree with. We all have to learn how to do this. If you keep swearing at other editors, you'll receive a longer block of one week or longer. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz, @Joseatienza has not improved since yesterday. He again is threatening to "block" although he is not an administrator. Allyriana000 (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I concur this is an ongoing problem with uncollegial behavior, see edit summary "I will block you", almost exactly 24 hours after Liz's final warning above. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miss World 2023, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please add the text and source to the body before add to the lead. the lead doesn't need a source per MOS:LEADCITE, please note that Missworld.com is a primary source and that a reliable tertiary source is required per WP:RELIABLE Sciencefish (talk) 11:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss World 2023, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Your addition to the lead is not notable and still has no entry or source in the main body of the article. Please not add such material to articles. Sciencefish (talk) 15:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miss World 2023. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Again you are edit warring. Sciencefish (talk) 15:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciencefish this user is still doing it. Allyriana000 (talk) 09:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciencefish please do not remove that "This is the second time that the Miss World pageant has been held in India." in the top in article of Miss World 2023 because i really want it thank you. Joseatienza (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Miss World 2023. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 13:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Miss World 2023. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joseatienza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am really say sorry but please unblock me and next time i will not re-edit anymoreJoseatienza (talk) 14:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not only does this not fully address the reason for your block but it's hard to see why we should believe you this time. You've had plenty of warnings and you've even been blocked from this before. It's more likely you'll be permanently blocked from editing Miss World 2023 and related subjects. Yamla (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Joseatienza, you cannot change an unblock request once it has been declined. You may post a new comment or another unblock request, but if you refactor a declined request again, your access to this page will be revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My Request reason: I apologize for the actions that I have made in the aforementioned article. My actions towards a certain user is wrong, and instead of reaching a consensus, I took the wrong way and blatantly reverted their edits. I may have good intentions, but those intentions do not always reciprocate my actions. I promise that I will not do it again, and continue to only add information and follow the three-revert rule. I do not wish to cause any harm to any user, and I do sincerely apologize for my actions.--joseatienza (talk) 00:13, 29 February 2024 (PHT)

Are you suggesting a topic ban around Miss World contests, broadly construed? What about falsely labeling other users' edits as vandalism? What about edit warring when you aren't breaching WP:3RR? --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do understand that edits that I disagree with are not vandalism. Allyriana000 was always removed that "This will be the second time that the pageant has been held in India" in the top of Miss World 2023 article. I am not breaching because that is true Miss World 1996 for the first time was held in india and Miss World 2023 will be the second time to be held in India but so please will not remove that "This will be the second time that the pageant has been held in India" in Location and date of Miss World 2023 article. Joseatienza (talk) 16:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be more convinced that an unblock is tenable if the editor were referring only to their own behavior and errors and not referring to the other party (Allyriana000) in the unblock request. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Krystyna Pyszková, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 08:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]