User talk:Jorge Luis899
August 2019
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a number of recent edits of yours to the page Natural-language programming have all had edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 10:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Jorge Luis899, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Jorge Luis899! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC) |
Repeated Formal Warning: Misleading edit summaries
[edit]Despite my request above, I see you are still trying to promote some website or other in External Links at Natural-language programming and using 'fix typo' as a clearly misleading edit summary. This looks to me like you have a conflict of interest and are NOTHERE to improve this encyclopaedia. In Plain English: please describe all your future edits correctly. Surely you know what a typographic error actually is? If you're adding an external link, just say so please. And don't add links that are not relevant to the encyclopaedia, and only serve to advertise some product, or another. Editors continuing with this type of activity do tend to get blocked. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:58, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
[edit]Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Natural-language programming. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
The article Natural Language Programming is incomplete because the Plain English Programming is a natural programming language
[edit]I posted the following message also in Wikipedia Teahouse.
The External Link I want to add is relevant to the article and it should remain because this article is incomplete, the Plain English is a natural programming language.
Plain English programmers are already programming at a human-language level. The main routine in the sample program in our instruction manual, for example, looks like this...
To run: Start up. Initialize our stuff. Handle any events. Finalize our stuff. Shut down.
...and those are the kind of sentences that English-speaking humans use when they are speaking to other English-speaking humans.
Again: Wikipedia editors,
Will you correct my editing errors? Jorge Luis899 (talk) 08:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- One of your editing errors was to write an edit summary of "fixed typo" when you actually added a spamlink. Please don't repeat such errors because they make it look as if you are trying to conceal bad edits. Shouldn't an advocate of Plain English use plain English? Dbfirs 12:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Jorge Luis899! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Jorge Luis899! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|