User talk:JordanPegram

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Up Out My Face, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Airplaneman ✈ 20:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angels Cry (song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:11, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Songwriting Credits

Songwriting credits in the infobox are given to match the BMI/ASCAP credits, which are to actual names, not stage names. "California Gurls" is credited to "Calvin Broadus", not "Snoop Dogg".—Kww(talk) 05:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

It is not neccessary to repeatedly link to artists within their song articles, a single link within the lead and the infobox will suffice. Please refrain from making any further edits of this nature. CloversMallRat (talk) 05:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to tell you about the same thing, please read WP:OVERLINK Candyo32 (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop! Enough is enough. You are violating WP:OVERLINK. I have reverted your edits on Tik Tok, Blah Blah Blah and Your Love Is My Drug. You have been given sufficient warnings, if you continue to violate WP:OVERLINK you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ..:CK:.. ^(talk2me) 03:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for not replying to issues on your talk page despite repeated attempts to get your attention. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32 04:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may be unblocked if you acknowledge the problem here, which is that you are incorrectly applying Wikilinks to articles (see WP:OVERLINK). The major problem is that you are ignoring multiple requests above to discuss your edits, you need to stop and indicate that you have received these requests, and intend to read Wikipedia guidelines and abide by them. --Jayron32 04:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Our Kind of Love, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nowyouseeme | wanna chat? 04:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your veteran editor JordanPegram requesting an editing unblock for multiple reasons. Over the last three years I've noticed a lot of inconsistency with pages such as "Umbrella" (Rihanna song) which in May 2007 had writer(s): Shawn Carter (Jay-Z), Kuk Hurrell, Christopher Stewart, Terius Nash & Robyn Rihanna Fenty. WRONG, recently Diahann Carroll being nominated for a 1969 Daytime Emmy Award (ceremony began in 1974) and the miscategorization of Carrie Underwood as singer-songwriter rather than singer, songwriter and actress when the majority of her material was penned by songwriter. Also Paula Deen's award wins was presumed with two Daytime Emmy in 2007 for Lifestyle Program and Host when she only won Lifestyle Host given she doesn't produce the award winning program. I truly without any ill intent believe that I have the ability to make constructive edit that are legible and accurate. For over four years it's been in public news that middle schools, high schools and college/universities do not allow wikipedia as a source when doing a term paper.etc.. I'm looking to change that and yes when it says writer or producer on music singles or musician profiles I edit them because not doing so give a viewer an impression that the artist/performer doesn't have a wikipedia page of their own and that if they view them and want to click on a link to view not only the song but artist they can click on that link. Thanks hope this can be resolved quickly and I hereby acknowledge all edits made by myself.

This Is An Attempt To Keep Wikipedia FREE of inaccuracies--- Let's work together and make it a million times better

Nicole Walker

Please do not introduce unsourced material to articles as you did to Nicole Walker. So what that Nicole was married to Trent? Your edits are unsourced, and there was NEVER any mention that she went by "Robbins". Please read WP:CITE and WP:V on how we properly cite and use sources here. Rm994 (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay that's fair enough but let me say this I have sources as a veteran editor and 20-plus year soap viewer. My musical & entertainment expertise are extremely reliable given that a lot of my earlier edits were unchallenged and met wikipedia guidelines.

Unchallenged does not mean meeting guidelines. And I am a 25 year plus-soap viewer, and I'm not reliable. Knowledge as a fan does not meet wikipedia standards. Sources must be in print, and pass verifiability guidelines. Just because no one reverted edits does not mean that they're actually correct. Wikipedia is not about truth, it's about verifiability. I of course, agree Nicole was married to Trent, but I can't source that with a reliable source. There are hundreds of soap facts that I would LOVE to add to this site, but I can't source them. I hope this clears up why I reverted the edit. It's not because I disagree with you, I don't...it was just unsourced per guidelines. Have a nice weekend. Rm994 (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have a nice weekend as well and please believe me when I tell you that I care about the accuracy and reliability of wikipedia and has never intentional edited pages that weren't correct, on a brighter note let's work together & make constructive edits

Oh I absolutely believe you had good intentions...and like I said, there are so many additions I wish that I could make as well. Hopefully we can find some good sources and make this site accurate! :) Rm994 (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have two reliable sources but I'm afraid everytime I attempt to edit it the page is reverted back to the original inaccurate categorization

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Nowyouseeme | wanna chat? 14:38, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JordanPegram (talk) 15:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carrie Underwood

Going off of Carrie Underwood's most recent studio album (Play On) alone, Underwood co-wrote the albums first 3 singles (Cowboy Casanova, Temporary Home, and Undo It), as well as 4 additional songs on the album, which adds up to 7 songs, meaning she co-wrote over 50% of the album. This is more than enough for her to be given the title of singer-songwriter. Nowyouseeme | [[User talk:Nowyouseeme|wanna ch

Don't know how you got involved but a singer-songwriter is someone that writes over 50 percent of the material of all music just because she wrote 7 of 13 songs doesn't make her a singer-songwriter because if that's the case Rihanna's page should be change because on Rated R she wrote 9 of the 13 tracks so she should be given that title. Not trying to make anyone upset just emphazing how some artists that actually write material on all of their albums (or majority) are given the "American recording artist" title and other that occasionally write are given the "American singer-songwriter" title, Only trying to make things fair.

The difference is negligible, your looking way too deep into something trivial and simple. It's fine the way it is. Also, please try not to cut into someone's signature like this again, and sign your posts. Nowyouseeme | wanna chat? 00:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean cut into's someone's signature, not even familiar with it because my edits have been done through my smartphone, and if you want me to sign my post explain it 2 me & why should I it's my user talk or so I thought...

P.S. Exactly what post did I not sign because if you're gonna call out something try with a little less crass as I've tried to be earlier I was 2 to rm and them u pop calling me on stuff that may be trivial but accurate and unbias. Let's clear this up and continue to make wikipedia larger than life

I gave you a notice above that explains how to sign your posts, as far as which posts you didn't sign, every one of them; you don't add your signature to anything you type. If you look above you can clearly see what I mean by cutting into my signature, you deleted half of it and started typing your edit, hence why all words have become red. I'm afraid I really can't understand what your saying in your P.S., it isn't clear. There is nothing here to clear up, everything is fine. Have a nice day. Nowyouseeme | wanna chat? 04:02, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to do the signature so excuse me if one isn't on here yet

Problems with upload of File:Replace this image male.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Replace this image male.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Lukesnyder.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lukesnyder.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Noahmayer.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Noahmayer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lukesnyder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lukesnyder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Riley Smith.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Riley Smith.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:JoshDuhon.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JoshDuhon.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 00:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Jacob Young as J.R..JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Jacob Young as J.R..JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 18:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MichaelGraziadei.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MichaelGraziadei.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:09, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MichaelGraziadei.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MichaelGraziadei.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:MichaelGraziadei.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:MichaelGraziadei.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Daytime Emmy Award does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - FlightTime (open channel) 14:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daytime Emmy Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary O'Leary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JordanPegram. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]