User talk:Jonywikis

March 2021

Hello, I'm William Harris. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dog, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. William Harris (talk) 10:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTBROKEN and WP:V

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:34, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nigerian hundred-naira note

The article Nigerian hundred-naira note has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not qualify for being encyclopaedic as it fails WP:GNG and doesn't credibly describe the importance of the subject. Besides, it doesn't have enough reliable sources for verification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A.A Prinon (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Veronica Openibo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Veronica Openibo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to show notability (WP:BLP1E). (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 20:23, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veronica Openibo has been accepted

Veronica Openibo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Newystats (talk) 05:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)