User talk:Jontyjoesph

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jontyjoesph for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Urban75, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your comments, but all my changes made to Urban75 were with reliable sources. I will discuss this matter further on your talk page. Jontyjoesph (talk) 17:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Million Dead. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Slocombe

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mike Slocombe, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.aboutus.org/Urban75.net. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mike Slocombe

A tag has been placed on Mike Slocombe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Urban75, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pontificalibus (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Formatting

Sorry, I don't mean to be a pedant (well, not too much...) but could you take a look at Wikipedia:Indentation with regard to threading talk page discussions please? Think you might find it helpful -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jontyjoesph for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enemytrue2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Pontificalibus (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]