User talk:Jomajor8

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikoletta Erdős

Hello Jomajor8,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nikoletta Erdős for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lordseriouspig 11:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Dunst moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to William Dunst. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar, it is a poor translation, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. WikiMoob (talk) 11:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Dunst moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to William Dunst. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dunszt family

A tag has been placed on Category:Dunszt family indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:29, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

William Dunst moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to William Dunst. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of pages

Hi my friend Jomajor8. I hope you are fine. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The general information on new page creation found HERE and especially HERE may help you, as may the referencing for beginners tutorial. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! I hope this helps. Good luck and best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Béla Dunszt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Béla Dunszt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Béla Dunszt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:58, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Béla Dunszt. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 16:33, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jomajor8. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Specifically relating to the Dunszt family. CoconutOctopus talk 16:34, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dunszt Kft. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dunszt Kft. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunszt Kft. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Dunst for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Dunst is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Dunst until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 19:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have added info.. irrelevant reasons for deletion Jomajor8 (talk) 13:07, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia without their explicit permission, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Béla Dunszt. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia's policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Jomajor8. Thank you. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:13, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]