User talk:WikiMoob

Welcome!

Hi WikiMoob! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Sorry, I reverted you: we don't link common terms such as current countries, their capitals ... -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Let's go. You did as you liked. I am very happy

WikiMoob (talk) 07:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draftification of Butternut Fire

Hi WikiMoob. I've reverted your draftification of Butternut Fire because none of the reasons you gave for draftifying applied. Please understand that stub articles are an allowed an expected part of Wikipedia. An article should not be draftified just for being short, and definitely should not be draftified under misleading reasons like WP:COI (unless you are saying that Thriley somehow has a conflict of interest with the fire‽). Draftification is a delicate area, and I frankly would not recommend it for a new user, but if you're going to do it, please be more careful. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Cassigad per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Farhan Rana Rajpoot. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 11:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vishnu Teja moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vishnu Teja. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 13:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]