User talk:JokerJane
|
Grant Stinchfield
[edit]Per WP:POLITICIAN, a person is not notable just for being a candidate for office — and at this point, Stinchfield isn't even a candidate in the general election yet, but merely a candidate in a party primary that has yet to occur, and which he may or may not win. In principle, a politician cannot be considered notable on here until he or she has actually won an election — although some candidates do manage to get articles on here even in losing, that comes down to the quality of the article that gets written, and is not because unelected candidates have any entitlement to be on here.
And furthermore, most of the references you left on my page are blog entries, which do not count as reliable sources — and the article, as written, contained no references at all, and was written in a campaign brochure sort of tone that does not meet our neutral point of view rules. So even if he were notable enough, he still wouldn't be entitled to that version of the article.
So as things stand if he wins the Republican nomination you might be able to make a credible case that he's notable enough for an encyclopedia article (though you'd still have to write a better one than that first piece of campaign advertising you wrote today.) But as of right now, he's not entitled to be on Wikipedia just for being a candidate in a future primary. Bearcat (talk) 06:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User:Winstontx. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not for political promotion
[edit]Please read Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. JohnCD (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Your message
[edit]I am familiar who the users are that warned you, and it was removed because it failed Wikipedia:Politician and was seen as advertising (see Wikipedia:G11). It wasn't that people affiliated with other politicians removed the page. If you would like to start the page again, please see Wikipedia:Politician, Wikipedia:Writing better articles or ask me. SwisterTwister talk 00:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- To add to that: WP:POLITICIAN expressly excludes articles about political candidates. One of the many reasons for that was well illustrated by the Stinchfield article, which immediately became a WP:BATTLEGROUND with single-purpose accounts adding and removing information and accusing each other of bias and corruption. That is not what an encyclopedia is for - please take your political squabbles elsewhere. Before you edit again, please read WP:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion and WP:No personal attacks. If you are connected with Stinchfield's campaign, you should also read WP:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)