User talk:Johnnyfaviero

Welcome!

Hello, Johnnyfaviero! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Call It Whatever (song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:37, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated addition of unreferenced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:56, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bradley Steven Perry, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing again, this time for a longer period, for continuing disruptive editing, including persistently adding doubtful unsourced content to articles. (Also, you should be aware that repeatedly reverting to your own preferred version of an article in the face of other editors changing it (known as edit warring), as you did at Demi Lovato, is considered disruptive, and can lead to being blocked. On this occasion, you did this only to a very small extent, and I would not have blocked you just for that, but it all adds to the impression that you are less willing to edit collaboratively than would be desirable.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Per WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research, you MUST provide citations to reliable sources when adding or changing content. This particularly applies for pages on living people. Continuing to add unsourced/poorly sourced content is disruptive. You've been warned about this before, so don't be surprised if you get blocked again for further unreferenced additions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. seicer | talk | contribs 16:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm...

I'm not sure whether or not to give you a warning not to vandalize articles, or to thank you for making a new article. On the one hand, you seem to have a history of being banned for disruptive editing, on the other hand, you are the one who created the article in question, Austin & Ally: Take It from the Top, and you seem to at least have put decent (albeit unsourced) information there. Please note that your last edit messed up the formatting pretty bad. You might want to try writing the article in your user sandbox, or start it as Draft first, before publishing it, so you don't have to faff around with the formatting and potentially break everything on the page. Oh, and one more thing, can you find any citations to show that this is actually a thing, that the information in the articles correct? Verifiability of the information in an article is very important on Wikipedia. SarrCat ∑;3 01:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see you fixed the formatting. Next time you create an article, try creating it as a draft, so you can tweak it without raising suspicion of vandalism. Thanks! SarrCat ∑;3 01:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Krakatoa Katie 04:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liv and Maddie: Music from the TV Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cloud 9. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Scream Queens (2015 TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Callmemirela {Talk} ♑ 01:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lindsay Lohan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scream Queens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 5 albert square (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruby Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Around the Block. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. You've been repeatedly told in the past to include citations to reliable sources in the past and still appear to be disregarding previous warnings and blocks. You WILL be reported again if this keeps up. Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: TV films

TV films belong in the television section of an actor's filmography - see WP:FILMOGRAPHY. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist, I was looking for the block log and I realised that in the summary you have mentioned only two words "same behaviour". Some explanation in the form of phrase or few more words would have helped. Though it's a old thing and you might not have used such a short summary again but I thought I should inform you, if that helps us by anyway. Thanks and let me know if I am wrong in understanding this situation. QueerEcofeminist🌈 03:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Johnnyfaviero. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]