User talk:Johnnybart2

This is Johnnybart2's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: David T. Adams (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://archive.org/stream/duluthstlouiscou03vanb/duluthstlouiscou03vanb_djvu.txt. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:David T. Adams may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnnybart2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:David T. Adams

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:David T. Adams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/duluthstlouiscou03vanb/duluthstlouiscou03vanb_djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnnybart2. This was a mistake: your draft was not a copyright violation, so I've put it back into the queue to be reviewed again. Apologies for the inconvenience. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for putting this article back in the queue to be reviewed again. Johnnybart2 (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David T. Adams (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Read WP:REF and add references to support claims per WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David T. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 04:44, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My submission for the biography of David T. Adams was rejected by you for citing unreliable sources. I included a book ("Seven Iron Men"), an article from an American Historical Society publication ("History of St. Louis County") and two newspapers ("The Virginia Enterprise" and the "Duluth News Tribune"). Which one(s) of these sources were deemed unreliable?

John Bartholomew, contributor Johnnybart2 (talk) 15:11, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David T. Adams

Hello, Johnnybart2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David T. Adams, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David T. Adams

Hello, Johnnybart2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David T. Adams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David T. Adams has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David T. Adams. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 06:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David T. Adams (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide at least links to these sources for verifiability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David T. Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added links after each of the six footnoted sources. I hope this is sufficient for publication. 2601:281:80:23F0:5DDA:8EE5:9E61:CCE2 (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David T. Adams

Hello, Johnnybart2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David T. Adams".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was asked to provide links to my footnote references to my article on David T. Adams months ago, and never heard back whether they were satisfactory. I have to assume they weren't since you have now removed the article for lack of attention. Communicating with you people has been arduous at times and at times like this impossible. I give up. 2601:281:80:23F0:BD39:B979:951D:CA38 (talk) 00:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]