User talk:Johnny Freak

ok

Image changes

Could you please discuss on the article pages about the changes to the images you wish to make before you make them? Tabercil (talk) 23:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tiffany Mynx, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 23:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Hansel and Gretel (2007 film).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hansel and Gretel (2007 film).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gett - The Trial of Viviane Amsalem POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gett - The Trial of Viviane Amsalem POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electricity (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saw (2004 film) 10th anniversary POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saw (2004 film) 10th anniversary POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop uploading the same images over my uploads

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Film Fan 06:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:It Follows (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:It Follows (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Duke of Burgundy POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Duke of Burgundy POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Film Fan 08:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:It Follows (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:It Follows (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:It Follows POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:It Follows POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Duke of Burgundy UK Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Duke of Burgundy UK Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Duke of Burgundy. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Diannaa (talk) 20:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop uploading duplicate images

This is your only warning; if you add an inappropriate image to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Film Fan 09:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have not added any inappriopriate images. Advice unfounded, Film Fan likes to put unjustified warring on my talk page. He thinks to put fear by doing so.--Johnny Freak (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:It Follows (poster).jpg

I see you have been edit warring over this and other film posters, uploading identical copies of the poster. Somehow you have gotten the impression that it matters who gets credit for the upload. In fact it doesn't matter; what matters is that we upload a high-quality image for each film, in order to build a better encyclopedia. Edit warring over images only generates work for the few administrators who work in this area. It needs to stop, or further blocks for edit warring will be issued. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:These Final Hours POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:These Final Hours POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Still Walking (film) POSTER.png

Thanks for uploading File:Still Walking (film) POSTER.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:These Final Hours POSTER.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:These Final Hours POSTER.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oldboy (2003 film) POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oldboy (2003 film) POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Persepolis (film) POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Persepolis (film) POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Overnight (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Overnight (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Diary of a Teenage Girl (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Diary of a Teenage Girl (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ex Machina (film) UK POSTER.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ex Machina (film) UK POSTER.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Queen of Earth (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Queen of Earth (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Diary of a Teenage Girl POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Diary of a Teenage Girl POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Room poster

Why are you resisting the new poster? It's the theatrical release poster. Please explain your objection. Film Fan 23:12, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Posters.

Hi. It doesn't matter WHO uploads posters. What matters is the quality. Agreed? Let's not argue over something silly. You might want to use a better image reduction program if you're uploading posters. Thanks. I can message you a good program with good settings if you like. Film Fan 15:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter WHO uploads posters. Is it true your thinking? I can not believe you wrote this. Sure you're all right? So far you have always acted acted just to get you the merit of posters uploaded by others. I have never changed your posters, clear or blurred, I let you the work to fix or not your poster because You do not want me to change your poster. Conversely you changed many of my posters by loading wrong versions. Ps: you know well that my poster of 'Room' is the official one. Your is reported in only a single site.--Johnny Freak (talk) 16:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Room poster is official and is on several websites. It just premiered (as many posters do) as an exclusive. And I don't upload blurry pictures because I have the right program and settings. I have uploaded the wrong poster on occasion and conceded that when appropriate. If I upload the same version of a poster, it's because I've downloaded and compared the two posters very closely, or because I've seen straight away that the quality of the poster I'm replacing is not up to scratch. The OVERNIGHT poster is just one clear example of a an okay copy being replaced by a good copy. And it matters to me because I love the film. Like I said, WHO doesn't enter into it. I like seeing high quality uploads by other people. Film Fan 23:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the case of The OVERNIGHT poster, if you compare Your Version with My Version and read the words "Adam Scott" or "Judith", they are clearer in my poster. What program do you use?--Johnny Freak (talk) 10:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Your picture is simply bigger than mine (and bigger than the fair use policy allows). The writing on it is very small. I use FastStone, but it's important to get the settings right. Film Fan 11:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But if we speak only in my talk, when you know that I replied? You need to hide the flaws of your talk? Honestly I always used FastStone. This means that we use different settings. Yours is clearly photoshopped. You can not photoshop poster. If a poster is clear it must to remain clear, if it has dark heads it must be dark. You can not make a poster dark slightly lighter. The nature of the heads, titles and colors of poster must be original, only reduced in size. Not photoshopped to make them luminous than it actually isn't. That's what makes unnecessarily increase the size of the poster.--Johnny Freak (talk) 11:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. My reduction simply retains more information from the original file. It's sharp, and accurate. It is not altered. I don't even know how that argument can be made here... and the size of the file is irrelevant. It's the size of the image that matters. Film Fan 13:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding a better source for the Anomalisa poster. Remember to add this template when replacing non-free images: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Orfurrev Film Fan 12:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem now? Explain your Victoria poster revert properly or leave it be. There is absolutely no cropping whatsoever on my new copy, and the image retains more information from the original poster, making the text easier to read. You're making it about WHO uploads again, rather than WHAT. Bored of it. I'm a stickler for quality and I don't give a %^&* who uploads what. Claim ownership if that's what you want to do. Reupload the same poster yourself, but don't revert for ridiculous reasons. Cheers Film Fan 14:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've emailed you. Film Fan 15:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It's You that make it a matter about who uploads, not me. I explained my revert. Your explenation about your left cropped version is incomprehensible. What means your version contains more information? For what I see, it contains only more kilobytes.--Johnny Freak (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dude. Did you even read what I wrote? The density of my upload is greater, making the image closer to the original file and the text more legible. I emailed you about this... Film Fan 16:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - If I can make you happy now I upload your cropped version of Victoria but with less kilobytes because there is no difference.--Johnny Freak (talk) 17:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - My upload is NOT cropped in any way and the text on the image is easier to read. How are you not getting this? Why are you still making this about YOU and when did kilobytes become and issue for you? Film Fan 17:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You know other programs or sites in addition to others that you have mentioned to resize images? Anything else that I still do not know?--Johnny Freak (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried many, paid and unpaid, and the one I mentioned in the email is the best at retaining visual information. Slightly larger filesize is irrelevant. We should try to upload the best quality available. Film Fan 17:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I knew the files can not be too heavy in filesize because it increases the quality.--Johnny Freak (talk) 17:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Film Fan 22:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Film posters

Hi Johnny Freak. I noticed that you have been edit warring over film posters. For example, at File:Carol (film) POSTER.jpg and File:Tu dors Nicole POSTER.jpg. Wikipedia has a policy against edit warring, and continued violations will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnny Freak. You need to stop edit warring right now, or blocks will be forthcoming. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (poster).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The Tale of the Princess Kaguya (poster).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't start this again.

Remember your warning from Diannaa. Film Fan 12:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And still you continue. I've reported you. If your edit is reverted - especially with an actual reason - you either leave it or take to the talk page. You seem incapable of this. I'm so tired of you. Film Fan 12:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Son of Saul (poster).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Son of Saul (poster).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 20:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:(T)ERROR poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:(T)ERROR poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Appropriate Behaviour UK POSTER.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Appropriate Behaviour UK POSTER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Johnny Freak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Touched by an Angel (DVD cover art - season 4, volume 2).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Touched by an Angel (DVD cover art - season 4, volume 2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 05:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Diamond Tongues (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diamond Tongues (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Son of Saul (poster).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Son of Saul (poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Man in the High Castle (TV title).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Man in the High Castle (TV title).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]