Jump to content

User talk:Johnniedehuff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hgilbert. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Triangular trade because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. HGilbert (talk) 01:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 16:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ethan bradberry. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 18:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Great Meadows Regional School District has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Great Meadows Regional School District. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —MelbourneStartalk 14:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on Ethan bradberry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —MelbourneStartalk 14:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnniedehuff (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am sorry and will not vandalize again ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A simple apology is insufficient. You have edited here occasionally for about a year, and every edit without exception has been a vandalism. Please answer two questions: why did you initially create a Wikipedia account, and if you are unblocked what will you write about? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnniedehuff (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i am very sorry. I created an account so i can test out wiki features and talk on talk pages. If i am unblocked i will contribute positively to other wikis and not vandalize them. I would like to make a article on XXXTENTACION who is a rapper. I would talk about his songs, his life and other ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline due to lack of response. Please feel free to respond to the questions listed below at your convenience. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How can we trust you. If you were unblocked, what exactly will you edit and how will you edit. FixCop (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - I will not unblock you without a brief summary of an article you would like to edit constructively and a basic plan of how you would do it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:59, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]