User talk:Johnjupitherr111

January 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Igbo language, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the mistake, thanks for your reminder Johnjupitherr111 (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Igbo language, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ogba people. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ogba people was changed by Johnjupitherr111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851775 on 2024-01-13T00:18:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please get consensus before moving pages to different spelling variants

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiresome etholinguistic disruption

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnjupitherr111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hey I'm sorry for my previous edit as I wasn't fully aware of all Wikipedia editing policy, and now I will read more about Wikipedia rules & procedures and follow all guidelines henceforth. I wish to be be unblocked and thanks for understanding Johnjupitherr111 (talk) 09:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please be more specific and tell what was wrong with your edits and what you will change about your editing in the future. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnjupitherr111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hey dear, I was blocked for editing information about Okra I was trying to add a more accurate information about the origin of okra and how the name okra was derived from the igbo word Ọkụrụ came to be in the late 17 centuries by Americans during the Atlantic slavery, but was unfortunately blocked for not taking permission from the previous editor. So I have realised the need to discuss with the editors before editing any Wikipedia page, hence i request to be unblocked for acknowledging my errors henceforth. Johnjupitherr111 (talk) 11:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The problems are far larger than just your edits to Okra, far larger. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Johnjupither per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnjupither. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]