User talk:John Gibbons 3

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, John Gibbons 3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! SabreBD (talk) 21:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and welcome again. Well done on your edits so far, particularly concerning Colin Ross, but I feel I should point out that ticking the minor edit box is really only for very small edits like typos and adding links. It doesn't bother me much but some editors treat this as disguising controversial edits where the matters are more substantial. Keep up the good work.--SabreBD (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Vickers (fiddler) for deletion

The article William Vickers (fiddler) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Vickers (fiddler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 15:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder, and the hint about the signature button.--John Gibbons 3 (talk) 16:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Joe Hutton (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

sonia♫ 16:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of your articles

Hi John, I'll start by saying that your primary editing topic, piping, is probably as familiar to me as my regular topic, Australian rules football is to you (and my feelings for the bagpipes rank only slightly less than the saxophone for my least enjoyed instrument!) But, somethings on wikipedia cross all geographical and topical boundaries. I'll separate them into points below:

You shouldn't recreate new pages such as William Dixon manuscript when a similar page already exists, ie William Dixon (piper). Instead, there is a move button that will allow you to move everything, including the page history and talk page to a more appropriate title with one click (well, a few clicks). To fix up the current duplication, given the more extensive history at the (piper) article, could you attempt to merge the relevant info from the manuscript article into the (piper) article, and then use the {{db-G6}} template to request that an administrator temporarily deletes the manuscript article and then moves the (piper) article to the more appropriate title.
The notability requirements of articles is controlled primarily by the WP:GNG - the general notability guidelines. They state, that there should be significant coverage, in independent reliable sources. Each of those key words, significant, independent and reliable are explained in more detail on that page. Individual topics also have their own refinements to what is notable, and WP:MUSICBIO is probably the most relevant to your piper articles. Whislt they are probably skewed towards popular music and keeping out every garage/high school band that wants some publicity (which is obviously not the case for your long dead pipers), you should review the community agreed consensus and try to ensure that all of the articles that you create fulfill the requirements.
WikiProjects are areas on wikipedia where editors who are either geographically or topically related can discuss, maintain, review and assist improving articles. I note that most of your new pages don't have any projects listed. You add projects by adding the relevent project's template to the article's talk page. For example, all of the pipers should at least have a {{WikiProject Biography|listas=Bloggs, Bill|living=no|musician-work-group=yes}} template on their talk pages, and maybe a piping or county/region project too. Look at the talk pages of other similar pages for other examples and other projects. You don't need to ask permission, or sign on as a member of a project (although many projects do maintain an unofficial list of members) to add projects, but try to ensure that the article is truly in the scope of the project. I don't know if there is a piping related project, but there probably is a project related to the Northumberland region.

We have a policy here of assuming good faith in all editors, and I'm assuming that all of your edits are made in good faith, and likewise, trust me, I'm not going to start deleting your articles if you don't fix everything in the next week! I can see that you are enthusiastic about your topic of choice and probably are filling in a big whole in this compendium of knowledge, but the quicker you can pick up some of the nuances of the rules here, the easier and more productive your time here will be. If you have any questions, just reply here and I'll try to explain myself better. Regards, - The-Pope (talk) 16:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the advice about the 'move' button. My reason for creating the William Dixon manuscript page, was in answer to the criticism of the William Vickers page - a tentatively identified man can't possibly be notable, so the MS itself, in either case an important historical source for Northumbrian music and, in Dixon's case, for bagpipe music, should be the subject. The older William Dixon (piper) page can be deleted, as the content was copied across. I haven't found a project specifically covering Northumbrian music. John Gibbons 3 (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see the newer William Dixon manuscript page has already been deleted, so I'll try moving the William Dixon (piper) page. John Gibbons 3 (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Willy Taylor (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Will Atkinson (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Hutton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Willy Taylor (musician)

Great job on your article Willy Taylor (musician)! It is well formatted and very informative :). Let me know if there is ever anything I can do to help out, and keep up the good work! --Cerebellum (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouragement! John Gibbons 3 (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Armstrong (of Carrick)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Armstrong (of Carrick) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Intoronto1125 TalkContributions 23:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited John Armstrong (of Carrick), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elsdon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Armstrong (of Carrick)

I removed the speedy deletion tag on this one because it makes a credible claim for notability, but some more sources would really help stave off further efforts to delete it. You can even email me scans of hardcopy sources and I can help.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Archie Dagg

I am tracking down further printed, online and oral sources for this article. But his published compositions, his association with Billy Pigg and John Armstrong (of Carrick)and his musical influence generally in Northumberland and the Borders, mean an article about him is needed.

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charles Wheatstone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of his own. One of the most famous was the [[Concertina#English concertina|Wheatstone concertina]]). It was a six sided instrument with 64 keys. These keys provided for simple chromatic fingerings.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jim with pipes in his workshop.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jim with pipes in his workshop.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Clough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Cocks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Hair (musician) has been accepted

Thomas Hair (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Hair (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blyth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Clough Colour Photos -in greyscale- - Jim Bryan + Tom Clough + Foster Charlton + 1009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Clough Colour Photos -in greyscale- - Jim Bryan + Tom Clough + Foster Charlton + 1009.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Green (piper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morpeth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northumbrian Small Pipes Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Keene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fenwick manuscript article

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I’m a bit concerned that it has no citations. That worries me since without proof that this topic is notable, meaning covered enough in media for it to be possible to write a fair article on the topic, and that the information in the article is true, itmay get deleted. (It would be in particular good to know who has custody of the manuscript now, and if it's a well-known library the shelfmark and catalogue number etc.)

Are there any reliable sources on the topic that you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 12:38, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The MS is currently in private hands, and I need the owner's permission before saying who owns it. He has placed some information on the website I linked to, but I do not want to divulge more than I am free to. I will add citations as soon as I am able. But nothing relevant is yet published in print, at least since the Northumbrian Small-Pipes Society folded in 1900. The MS was only rediscovered this summer, so it is early days yet.John Gibbons 3 (talk) 12:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'm sorry, then, but I'm not sure this is exactly right for Wikipedia.
One of Wikipedia's principles is that it can never contain original research - claims based on your own knowledge. Everything must be verifiable in reliable sources that I or anyone else can check. There's an explanation of this by Jimmy Wales here. I will leave this, but I do recommend considering if this kind of material is right for posting on Wikipedia or if it's better off on your own blog that you control and has no expected community standards of what goes on it, since I'm not sure this kind of material would survive a deletion discussion - what it needs is to be referred to in reliable sources that are trusted and have a professional reputation. Perhaps a local museum in Northumbria would be interested in putting up an article about this manuscript on its website? Anyway, hope this is helpful to you. Blythwood (talk) 19:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a pity, as the MS is important, and has only recently come to light. But I accept Wikipedia's reliance on published sources, so it is perhaps too early to create a Wikipedia article on this subject yet. I may well be back with this once something has been published. The suggestion of a museum in Northumberland is a good one - the owner is hoping the MS will eventually go to the Pipers' Society, and be lodged in the Morpeth Chantry Bagpipe Museum. But while research on it is ongoing, it makes sense for him to hang on to it for the time being.John Gibbons 3 (talk) 20:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting references

John!

Good to see you working to add to your article on Young William.

If you could, when you add a reference, instead of putting it in brackets, could you put <ref> before it and </ref> after it? That way, it will show up as a reference and be on the reference list rather than as a link in the line of the article. (It look like you tried once, but just put </> at the end instead of </ref>.)

Thanks!

--Nat Gertler (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks - I'll bear this in mind. - John

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Young William Lamshaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morpeth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Young William Lamshaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elsdon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Hi, John. I caught your piece on William Cant (musician) in the New Pages queue and just wanted to thank you for this and your previous work, dating back to 2008, frequently dealing with topics that would otherwise go uncovered. Popular culture is important throughout history, not just in the current moment, and your efforts are appreciated. best regards, —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 15:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very many thanks - I'm glad that what I'm trying to do is appreciated. The project continues ....

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, John Gibbons 3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kathryn Tickell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billy Purvis (1853), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterloo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cornelius Stanton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cornelius Stanton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PiGuy3 (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Auld lang syne / William Shield

Fascinated by your edit to the William Shield article, especially after visiting the website about the Rod MacKillop album (the idea of Scottish lute music is a new one to me, but just the sort of thing to tickle my jaded old musical palette) - I might well want to get this one).

On the other hand the Balcarres manuscript, from which the (pre-1700?) set of variations on the well known melody is allegedly drawn, is not something that has previously featured here and DOES really need a more "reliable" citation than a "sleeve note" attribution. Our present remarks on the subject of the origins of the well known melody (both here, and in the parent article) are also poorly cited (another question altogether) - but regardless they do represent the consensus of several older sources that make no mention of the manuscript. Does it even warrant its own (well cited) article? Either way - a little more background information about the manuscript (how and when it came to light, for instance) would be useful. In fact, assuming that the manuscript is authenticated and reliably cited it makes nonsense of much of what we say in both articles - and both of them would require substantial editing.

The final point I would like to make is that any edits you make to Wikipedia need to be in "encyclopedic style". They need to read well in conjunction with what is already there, and not to make "persuasive" or rhetorical comments that might be very appropriate if you were writing a book or magazine article, or even an academic essay.

By all means respond to anything I say here (preferably on the talk page for one (or both?) of the articles concerned). Very best wishes! --Soundofmusicals (talk) 08:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally - have been doing some more digging on my own - Rod McKillop doesn't actually play the Auld Lang Syne variations, does he? Was keen to hear them. A little more of the information we want about the manuscript at https://boydellandbrewer.com/the-balcarres-lute-book-2-volume-set-pb.html - which may be a better source at least. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rob McKillop does play the Auld Lang Syne variations, and a fine bit of playing it is too. One of more than 100 pieces on his Youtube page. The Balcarres lute book, as one of the early sources of popular music in Scotland, and as - in McKillop's words, the 'most professional' of the Scottish lute manuscripts, deserves its own page, but I am certainly not the one to write it. I can add a relevant citation. For sure, the attribution of the tune to Shield is spurious, and needs little discussion except to refute it. John Gibbons 3 (talk) 15:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to try again to find it! Of course we always knew that the "attribution of the tune to Shield is spurious" - we have never taken this seriously, but, as you remark, been determined to refute it as succinctly and conclusively as possible. At the time this article was written (several years ago now) a google search brought up dozens of (mostly 3rd rate) "sources" - newspaper articles etc. - one or two of these (from memory) actually got a mention here but disappeared like the ephemera they always were, so that all that remains are those wretched "citation needed" tags. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 04:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a long obituary of Shield, from a few days after his death, on the British Newspaper Archive. I will use this to expand his biography. In particular, he seems to have known Haydn quite well, and said 'he had learned more from Haydn in four days, than in any four years of the rest of his life'. I will play through the relevant bits of the overture to Rosina - I am convinced that much of its material is taken from Auld Lang Syne, but it would be interesting to see if the modern form of the tune preexisted its appearance in Rosina. All other appearances in print that I have found seem to postdate it.John Gibbons 3 (talk) 11:54, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One 20th century newspaper article says ALS is derived from The Miller's Wedding, in Bremner's Scots Reels, from 1759. A totally different tune. Only primary sources will do.... John Gibbons 3 (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, John Gibbons 3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scottish music (1500–1899), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Oswald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, John Gibbons 3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Atkinson (Northumbrian piper) (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also much of the content is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Atkinson (Northumbrian piper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, John Gibbons 3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Atkinson (Northumbrian piper)

Hello, John Gibbons 3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Atkinson (Northumbrian piper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Atkinson (Northumbrian piper)

Hello, John Gibbons 3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "George Atkinson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, I understand your policy. I am still learning more about this important piper; I hope to return to the subject in the future - in particular, there's a press cutting where I need to identify the date and source before I can cite it. John Gibbons 3 (talk) 20:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]