User talk:John D. Croft

Welcome!

Hello John D. Croft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
[[Wikipedia:Tutorial pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Hurricane111 05:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, John. I am interested in the two articles you have started: Proto-Euphratean (talk · history · watch) and Proto-Afro-Asiatic (talk · history · watch). You are obviously writing from a pro-Nostratic point of view. However, Wikipedia is a community-built encyclopaedia in which many points of view are presented. Overall, we strive for a neutral point of view (please read), and try to back up our writing with sources, the corollary of which is no original research (please read). You may also want to read the manual of style, as this suggests how best to format articles. Some of your work so far has been labelled as problematic in one of these ways. This is quite common for newcomers: these labels are as much for the community as for you. Make use of the talk pages associated with each article to engage in discussion on the topic. Doing this often helps editors work together to improve articles. Feel free to ask me a question on my talk page. --Gareth Hughes 17:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Noongar

Hi John,

Thanks for your comments and contributions at Yagan, Noongar classification, Perth, Western Australia and Talk:Swan River Colony. Certainly you are right that there is a systemic bias towards the white colonial perspective of Western Australian history. I'm sure no-one intends to present a racist history, but that's what ends up happening because so few contributors understand indigenous culture and social structure.

I'm a pretty good example of this problem; when I was writing Yagan I tried to present a balanced view, and I tried to provide important cultural information such as Yagan's tribe and classification, but I simply don't understand it all well enough to write about it properly. Hence the second rate attempt at Noongar classification, and hence [edits like this].

Drew (User:Hesperian 11:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Drew

I am a very recent Wikipedia entrant and my skills are still fairly elementary. Looking at your excallent Yagan article shows me that your skills are of a high order. I still don't understand the nature of Wikipedia's policies regarding images, nor the technique for incorporating images into the text, and would appreciate any help on this I can get.

I would also appreciate help on the articles of Whadjuk and Pindjarup that I have recently written and uploaded.

Regards John D. Croft 22:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of evolution

You have recently added information regarding ice ages to the timeline of evolution article. Could you please provide a reference for that information? If your source is a book, could you also provide a brief quote from the book, to confirm the information (as per the other references on that page)? Thank you. -- Ec5618 10:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried adding the references but failed, as I am only a starter and don't understand the referencing format you have used.

They are

John, Brian (Ed)(1979) "The Winters of the World: Earth under the Ice Ages" Jacaranda Press ISBN 047026844-1 presents the evidence for the Huronian Ice Age.
Walker, Gabrielle, (2003) "Snowball Earth: The Story of the Great Global Catastrophe that Spawned Life as we know it" Bloomsbury ISBN 0747654337 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum, presents the evidence for the "Runaway Ice House theory.

Could you insert them for me

Many thanks

John D. Croft 11:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the references. Could you please provide a quote from each book? Ideally, I'd like to include a quote from "The Winters of the World" in which the Huronian Ice Age is concluded to be real (along the lines of "from all this, we can conclude that some 2500MYa, the Earth was in the middle of an Ice age"), and a quote from "Snowball Earth" in which the concept of Ice house effect is summarised (possibly from the back cover, along the lines of "The ice house effect was the result of rampant oxygen production, which destroyed most of the methane in the atmosphere, and caused the global temperature to drop dramatically"). Again, thank you. -- Ec5618 11:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently at work and under a fair bit of pressure (and don't have access to my reference library here) so I am unable to comply with your request at the moment. Thank you again for your help.

John D. Croft 03:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. We have time. Thanks. -- Ec5618 08:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Galaxy

Hi John, A lot of your edits to the Galaxy article look good, but it's really hard to follow when you make dozens of edits each day. Please try to make just a few major edits so that others who have the article on their watchlists can keep track of what's going on.

Also, I'm concerned about the non-scientific tone of some of the edits. Particularly, I don't think it's appropriate to have a section on "life in galaxies". Life lives on planets, which happen to be in galaxies, but I don't see a strong connection between the two. -- Xerxes 15:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate all the work you've put in to this - but can you explain the logic behind your most recent change. As far as I understand the literature, there's no evidence for more than one central black hole in the Milky Way Chrislintott 06:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yaw (god)

Greetings, John!

Great recent edits here. I hope more able editors like you will contribute to this article. I just now added a short phrase identifying Yaw with Chaos (mythology) further down (in paragraph two). Also, I think that Yam and Nahar should be specified as "bynames", a fact made clear in the excerpts from the Baal Cycle. What do you think?

- C. dentata 20:21, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great Castanea dentata, I like your edits. What about an earlier section though. Giovanni Pettinato at Ebla identified an earlier Yah phase appearance at Ebla associated with the reign of Ebrum there (see my post on the discussion page). Bottero and others have identified this with the extension of Akkadian Ea into northern Iraq and Syria under Sargon of Akkad. I would like to include this on your discussion of Levantine Yaw. What are your thoughts.

John D. Croft 00:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I enthusiastically agree. I think this will call for a new section. To do that, though, we will need to gather some reputable sources. You are welcome to start. I hope to run down to the uni. library at some point when I have time... - C. dentata

01:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

Hi John,

I'm all for countering the systemic bias in Wikipedia by providing better coverage of Aboriginal culture and history, so I think your knowledge and appreciation of these issues could be of enormous benefit to Wikipedia. But I must say some of your edits are unencyclopaedic in their bias. If you're going to write obviously POV statements like "Stirling's vindictive vengeful policies", it would be better if you didn't edit the articles at all. Can we try to keep it neutral and verifiable please? User:Hesperian 22:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gathering facts to support your position is original research, which does not belong on Wikipedia, even if you are right. The only appropriate way to support your position on Wikipedia is to gather references. Your statement that Stirling had vindictive vengeful policies is only verifiable if the majority of reputable sources clearly agree that Stirling had vindictive vengeful policies. A very brief look at my biography of Stirling by Statham indicates that Statham, for one, would not agree with your position. You need to refactor your statements to neutrally communicate all points of view, rather than propounding your own. User:Hesperian 07:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NCG250collision.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NCG250collision.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your post regarding Copywrite on the image of Galaxies colliding. I am still a newbie Wikipedia contributer and so have some difficulties in creating pages. The image, I believe was from a public domain site but for the life of me I cannot remember were I got it from. Can you help?

Warm regards

John D. Croft 06:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell the original source of the image was this press release it is available in super high resolution here. I can't find anything stating what the copyrigth of the image is. Maybe you could contact Gill Ormrod who's email is on the press release and ask about the copyright status. Failing that it is probably OK to use the fair use boilerplate {{Promophoto}} on it. --Martyman-(talk) 07:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

this site is in the image page as being the source, and it mentions credit to Gemini, if that helps. - cohesion★talk 07:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lahm

Lahm has been proposed for deletion. Is there any information that can be added to this article? If not, it makes more sense to simply include this information in a related article and make Lahm a redirect to that article. If there's more to be said about Lahm, please add some information to the article or explain your plans on the talk page. Also, definitely include some sources to comply with WP:V. If you feel you've made your case for keeping the article, go ahead and remove the "prod" notice to stop the deletion process. NickelShoe 06:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Western Australia

Hello John. I reverted your added statement in the Western Australia article claiming that Perth is nearer to Singapore than to Sydney. As I checked in Great Circle Mapper, Perth-Singapore is 2420 miles, while Perth-Sydney is 2041 miles. Clearly then, Sydney is still nearer to Perth. I did reword the sentence so the idea that Perth is quite isolated in that respect is still there. Elektrik Blue 82 00:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Image196.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Image196.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Stan 14:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ngc520collision.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ngc520collision.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pythia and Delphi

Hey, I'd like to thank you for your work on these articles, which is greatly improving their quality.

I hope this does not seem impertinent, but I wonder if I could ask you to give more complete citations in your edits. For instance, when you're quoting ancient sources, it would be very helpful to give the author, the work, and the location of the passage (book/line numbers for poetry, book/paragraph numbers for prose, or other standard reference system). Similarly, when you mention facts derived from modern scholarship, please cite author, work, page number. For instance, you've brought Lisa Maurizio's work into the article, which is a great thing, but it would be even better to have specific page numbers to look at to verify the information.

Again, I hope that my comment does not seem rude or offensive, because your edits are taking the articles in a much better direction. --Akhilleus (talk) 06:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Uruk.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Uruk.jpeg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Sustainability

Hi John, I noticed your contribution of the emergy table to the sustainability page. Because emergy has not yet gained universal acceptance some view the method and nomenclature with suspiscion. Because of this it is important to include as much referencing to published literature as possible. If you could provide references to the formulas and the table in the sustainability article that would be terrific. On another matter, have you performed any emergy audits to evaluate the sustainability of a region or entity? I'd be interested to have further contact with you on this. Please let me know. Cheers, Sholto Maud 10:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, John... As a result of noticing the work you've done on the Sustainability page, and then scanning through your User page, I thought I'd leave a message.

I recently left a message at the Talk:Fishery page concerning the inadequacy of the current Fishery article as regards any detail concerning the degradation of the ocean fisheries of the world. (Unfortunately, I realized, I had not logged in when I left my recent message requesting more information be added concerning impacts on "the noble fishes" (large, choice species such as cod, halibut, tuna, salmon).

It isn't that I think this (fisheries) is a special focus of yours or a special interest of yours, but I thought you might be in touch with some persons who may know something about this topic and might be willing to expand the Fishery article. Please pass this request on, if you would, to someone who can help out, if you know anyone. Thanks. Joel Russ

John, you wrote on my "Talk" page: "Hi Joel. Regarding sustainable fisheries, there are few good examples in the world to point to and industrial fishing, with sein purse nets and long-lines are particularly damaging to the environment. The Australian government has been particularly concerned with the poaching of Patagonian tooth fish (see article at http://www.aad.gov.au/default.asp?casid=11981) and also with the taking of sharks fins, trochus shells and beche la mer (Sea cucumbers) by Indonesian craft, operating for Chinese syndicates in the north."

Like myself, I believe you are very concerned to put positive sustainability ideas 'out there'... however, with respect to fisheries the news at present is mostly bad. But, still, the fact is not conveyed well (that is, in any detail whatsoever) in the Fishery article - which is why I wrote to you. Do you think we can find someone who can add a bit of useful detail? Afterall, Wikipedia is much used by secondary-school and college/university students as a first resource on many topics; they are the future, so they should be learning something about this vital dimension of the fisheries topic.

Best, Joel

License tagging for Image:Sumer1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sumer1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Ssumer2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ssumer2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Sumer3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sumer3.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Harald Hardrada.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Harald Hardrada.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Vavilov Zones1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vavilov Zones1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Community studies

Hi John. I appreciated your edits on Community development and other contributions. Image:Vavilov Zones1.jpg would be useful if you could give it a licence and a bit of backing. The Neolithic revolution article is quite interesting. We could use some help on other community-related articles espesially Community studies. I know of the Gaia Movement from Wikia:Ecovillage (where you can do original research). • CQ • WP:CBTF • 15:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Enki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Enki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whadjuk

Hi John, I noticed you spent a lot of time with this article. We've run into a problem with the Mount Eliza, Western Australia and the Kings Park, Western Australia articles both of these have differing Names to each other ad to the Whadjuk article. Would know of a source that we can quote to clear this up as our sources all differ. Gnangarra 00:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

r/K selection theory

Hi there. I've just been looking at your recent edits to the r/K selection theory article. I'm afraid that I'm not convinced that they help articulate the general theory. It seems to me that the concepts of r/K are used in Adaptive Capacity analogously to how they are used in ecology. Certainly the current reference to adaptive capacity is unclear and confusing (it also needs copyediting). It might be better to move the adaptive capacity material to a "See also" point. Not least because explaining the relevance of r/K for adaptive capacity might be best done there (I notice that it's not at the moment). Cheers, --Plumbago 16:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tale of Two Brothers

Is this is not copyrighted (On the one hand, it is old enough to be in the public domain, on the other hand, I doubt it was originally written in English) would it not be more suited to being in WikiSource, as is it is basically just the original text? J Milburn 14:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I thought it unlikely that it was a copyright violation, but what you have written isn't an encyclopedia article, it is the story in modern English. J Milburn 14:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More appropriate than just copying out the source text would be to move the source text to WikiSource, and to talk about the significance of the text. Remember to reference what you say, take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) and check this. Both of them talk about what I have said in more detail, with examples. Drop me a line if I can be of any help. J Milburn 14:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to make the article relevent to Wikipedia would be to have a read of Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction). That talks about what to include, and how to include it. Remember to source everything you say! J Milburn 15:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semitic & PAA

I emailed you about Proto-Semitic and Afro-Asiatic, but you haven't responded. Could you send those articles to my email address? I'd love to discuss the issue with you. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 08:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noongar

Nice to see someone addressing bias in , and general improvements to the article. Take a look at WP:CSB if you don't know it. You could probably improve that also. Wikiproject Western Australia (WP:WA) could benefit from someone like yourself. So could the Whadjuk article if you are passing that way. Faithfully, Fred 16:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have read your talk page. Please join the WP:WA Fred 15:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WA Project

Welcome to the project - hope you can cope with those of us like fred and I - hes freo I'm the hills and there are others between! User:JarrahTree 06:34, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fred. I tried signing up to the WP:WA page and could not manage it. Any help gratefully received. John D. Croft 17:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome John, sorry I didn't get back to you. I'm glad you solved the problem. I intend to simplify the participants section, editing a page is something I found a bit mystifying when I started at wikipedia. This was only recently, so I can only offer basic assistance and good advice I have received. Such as, "swipe from others", copy the code you find on pages here - even user pages (not mine!). Check out the talk pages of others, for example at our WP:WA. A quick glance at your contributions shows you have been busy. Your contributions at nyungar related pages would be more than the regular 'two cents', ~~have a look at them if interested~~ your 40 000 'ceiling' comments were helpful to me. I hope you are finding it enjoyable here. Regards,

Fred 09:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jcroft.JPG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Jcroft.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. feydey 17:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gaiamainlogo.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Gaiamainlogo.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. feydey 20:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've retagged the image as {{logo}}

Green Transport Project

I've deleted this article as being a non-notable project. You may wish to review Wikipedia:Notability. Also, the article you created read very much like a brochure rather than being an encyclopedia article. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a hosting service for groups or their projects, but an encyclopedia. It is important for us to maintain the neutral point of view at all times in articles. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. --Durin 20:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Gaiamainlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gaiamainlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Durin 21:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try

Bibbulmun Track User:JarrahTree 13:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

European Dark Age

I replied to your message on my talk page.--FreeKresge 17:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bay, Amenmesse and Seti

Thanks for the informative reply on the Syrian influence in the 19th dynasty court. Can you list the reference & page number for your contribution on he evil Paneb in your article on Seti II? You obviously have a book or magazine on him. With kind Regards, Leoboudv 23:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC) Thanks for editing out the nonsense on Seti II. Its good to know someone pays attention to historicity here! BTW, if you have any cited info on Paneb, pls feel free to add a reference to it. I once saw an article mention Paneb but can't remember its source. Leoboudv 08:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Influenza

Your addition to this article is very interesting, but it may be removed if it is not supported by a reference. Could you hunt something up? History isn't really my area of expertise. TimVickers 19:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:WAS 4.250 has now removed that section, but if you add it back with a reference and phrased to make it clear this is discussing the early history of influenza, I'm sure there will be no problem. TimVickers 20:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TimVickers 20:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Ages

Sorry for the long reply. The reason I removed it was because the article is focused on the European Middle Ages, with Dark Ages (disambiguation) handling other so-called "dark ages". It's been a problem in the past with people using the article for all sorts of purposes and we are trying to keep it focused to the one topic. I'm afraid that paragraph is going to open a can of worms as people expand on it. -- Stbalbach 17:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Western Australian Aboriginal Groups

Be happy to help in any way I can. - Fred ^(talk) 03:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to Dark Ages

Ok, gotcha, sorry about the issue. FYI, there's a template somewhere (sorry, I don't have the link handy) that says something to the effect of 'This article is currently undergoing a major revision. Please do not edit it until this template is removed'. Alternatively, you could create a subpage of your userpage and use that as a sandbox. Again, sorry about that. Hornandsoccer ^Talk 02:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Western European Dark Ages is a content fork and against the rules. -- Stbalbach 03:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John, I understand what your trying to do, but it will just get reverted, you have not established consensus to rename Dark Ages to Western European Dark Ages - in fact there are considerable number of people against it - nor is there any consensus that Dark Ages should be a article about something besides Europe. In fact we already have a whole bunch of articles on Wikipedia that cover the topic you want to discuss. Finally, Dark Ages is most commonly used in relation to Europe, which is why it gets preference for the article title, per the Wikipedia rules on "most common usage" under article naming. I understand your point of view, but I'm not sure you fully understand the rules of how Wikipedia operates when there are disagreements. -- Stbalbach 03:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Akkad

Please discuss such radical changes on the talk page before you redirect the entire article.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And get feedback from others.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deluge (mythology)

I see that you've moved part of the description under "The flood of Ogyges" to "Theories of origin". This description refers to the map of the Aegean Sea and is also associated with Plato's account. If you don't mind, I propose to move the description back to "Ogyges", next to the relevant map. --Odysses (☜) 12:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Meetup 2

Due to a foul-up, my WP email page was not activated which has now been fixed. As noted on the Meetup talk page, could you please email me with the details you'd like to have placed on your nametag. Firstnames and Usernames as a minimum, Surnames accommodated on request. Cheers, Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Study of History

Hi. I noticed you had made several edits to A Study of History, so I'm hoping you will either know, or know who can, answer whether a particular edit was politically motivated and wrong. User:neomoon made some one-sided edits today, which shows they are "on one side" or the other of Korea vs. Japan. So their first edit to the article may have not been (cough) factually-based. A totally minor point, and I could probably safely revert it, but if you have certain knowledge that would be far better. Shenme 22:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal History of Western Australia

John, I really enjoyed this and congratulate you on putting together a very readable essay on a very tricky subject. I warn you though that the nature of this place is that it will be criticised for being too opinionated in a few places and from time-to-time taking an unencyclopaedic tone. For example: "Hopefully, in this first part of the 21st century Australians of non-Australian origins will at last be able to recognise both Aboriginal and white Australians as full brothers and sisters in the future of this country."; and "Understanding our landscape is dependent upon our understanding of the Aboriginal history of the people who made this landscape." Some quotations in inverted commas, eg. "biologically capable of having children, but not socially capable of raising them" really must have inline citations.

I hope that you will accept these as constructive criticisms and are prepared for some vandalism which this will no doubt attract. Regards —Moondyne 08:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave some more comments on the talk page for wider involvement. —Moondyne 08:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Pinjarra

Would you mind having a look at this sometime? —Moondyne 12:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick read, it looks much improved - thanks. I'd like to go over it more closely tomorrow. Cheers. —Moondyne 15:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your images

Two images you uploaded, Image:Paleogeobiophysiology1.jpg and Image:Paleogeobiophysiology.jpg, are currently under discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geology. I'm inviting you to respond - specifically, what the sources were for this information and whether you could re-make these graphs to be less confusing. The way, the truth, and the light 05:56, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

regarding Wangai

Hey! i do not set out to insult anyone. Please assume good faith. I created the redirect because the page seems like nonsense to me, i have never heard of such people and your article has no reliable references, in fact it has none at all. A quick "google" search resulted with no substantial returns, so I added the redirect. Would you please add some references? that would be great. Assuming that this information is true, perhaps it could be incorporated with the Indigenous Australians article. Or more information could be added to the current article. Slowbro 06:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perth Meetup Notification

	Perth Meetup v t e Next: 2 November 2024 (watch) Last: 6 October 2024
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

You are invited to a meetup of Western Australian Wikipedians on the 19th August 2007 in the tearooms of Tranby House. Please sign on the Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/3 if you are able to attend. you recieved this message as your account has been active during May, June 2007 and your user page is listed in the Category:Wikipedians in Western Australia Gnan garra 03:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

higher criticism

thanks for your help. Jonathan Tweet 06:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I can help you on the ancient history of Israel and Judah front. For one thing, I'm out of my depth. For another, it looks like one of those articles that conflates Biblical narrative and history. Good luck with it. Jonathan Tweet 15:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Waldorf education

Thank you for contributing to the Waldorf education page. We are under arbitration rulings requiring us to cite references for all material; do you have one for the comparison (which I find very apt) to Teilhard? If not, it probably qualifies as original research and should be dropped. Sorry... Hgilbert 18:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking. Hgilbert 01:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

Thanks for your excellent photos of Twosret and Chancellor Bay and also for the footnotes on Akhenaten. If possible, please try to list the specific page of the book you cite since a publication may contain hundreds of pages. Unfortunately, Akhenaten will never be a featured Wikipedia article on Wikipedia. He just attracts too many weirdos and followers of unorthodox ideas. The only serious contribution I made here was the section on his International relations where I cited the invaluable resource of the Amarna letters. Regards, Leoboudv 07:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Geography

Very good of you to start - its a brave editor to start an art like that one - however dont expect anything but merciless editing though - cheers - and well done to have started it! User:JarrahTree 03:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It basically is a very challenging article to start - I am going to slowly jump in every now and then seeing i personally knew most of the UWA and Curtin geography people of 20 years ago and more - there are many many issues that need to be nutted out - and it wont happen overnight - I am sure of that! [[User:JarrahTree] 05:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Actually reading your user page ( mine is impervious) - I realise we were probably around at the same time at UWA and crossed paths - we should have fun doing it (the article) just getting the big picture alone - is a challenge . oh well another day a few more words - cheers User:JarrahTree 06:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WAClimates.jpg

Hi John. You describe the image as your own work using Powerpoint. Unfortunately, I don't think that that will stack up against the copyright experts here who will take a strict line in that the map is clearly based on a presumably copyrighted map previously published elsewhere. Hence it is a derivative work. Unless you genuinely are the creator of the base map (in which case you need to clearly state this on the image page), I am afraid that it'll need to be redone using a "free" base map. Some free maps of WA are at commons:Category:Maps of Western Australia and Category:Maps of Australia. A Köppen classification map for Australia has been done at Image:Australia-climate-map MJC01.png which could be cropped I suppose to show WA only. Sing out if you need a hand or more guidance. —Moondyne 07:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it. The bottom line is that someone, somewhere owns the copyright to that old tourist map. And the Wikimedia Foundation has decreed that it will not publish copyrighted materials, including derivative works. Per US Copyright Office Circular 14: Derivative Works: "Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to prepare, or to authorize someone else to create, a new version of that work." —Moondyne 08:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHat a pain that is - i bet some lawyer somewhere has the high paid job in tracing impossible to find copyright holders Satu Suro 09:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright covers the expression of information, not the information itself. The geographical information in an old tourist map is not copyrightable; only the way in which that information is expressed is.

For example, the makers of that old tourist map had to decide upon a projection and coordinate system for them map. They had to decided whether or not to distinguish between different classes of road, and if so how. They had to decide which features to list and which not to. For roads, they had to choose between full, broken or dotted lines; they had to select a line thickness and a line colour. They had to do the same for railway lines and rivers. They had to select background shading colours for ocean, land and lakes. They had to decide upon icons for features such as bridges, hills, etc. They had to choose a typeface and font size for place names. All of these things represent creative decisions about how to represent geographic information, and all of them are copyrightable.

But the geographical information underlying the map is not copyrightable. If John extracted the geographical information from the map, e.g. by tracing it, but independently made his own decisions on colour schemes, font, iconography, etc, then the resultant creative work is his and his alone. I don't think that has happened here though; I think this map reuses the original map's iconography etcetera. So we have a problem.

Hesperian 11:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK Gents, leave it with me, I'll try to redraw the outlines and recreate the map - unforuntanely the way I have done my maps in the past have been using Powerpoint (the only map making package I have - if someone has a better system and was interested I'd gladly pass it over to them. It would be good if the new map includes the sites mentioned in the climatic texts. John D. Croft 23:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I created a new one based on a cropped version of the Australian map. See Image:Western Australia-climate-map.png. —Moondyne 06:27, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Geography of Western Australia

John, could you look at Talk:Geography of Western Australia#Climate Change and Global Warming section sometime please. —Moondyne 07:19, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks John. I tidied up the references a bit more. —Moondyne 09:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal history of Western Australia

In period 3, the last 2 entries say 1977 and 1979. I presume they should read 1877 and 1879. I'd change myself but thought it best to let you fix. —Moondyne 02:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And regards to you to. Thanks. —Moondyne 02:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/3 is next sunday 19th August, if you haven't already please sign on the meetup page if your coming, if your still unsure indicate anyway so I can confirm numbers with the venue thankyou Gnan garra 00:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mehrgarh 7000–3200 BC

Fair enough. (RookZERO 03:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Civilization

As one of the few regular watchers of the Civilization article, I wanted to discuss my changes with you directly. I'm slowly preparing a completely new version of the page with a more logical outline and more citations. Would you like to take a look at it so far? Right now it is little more than an outline with a few sections on their way to being fleshed out. It's at User:Fishal/Civilization. I've already put the new lead section into the article, but I'd love to hear your thoughts on the rest of it, particularly the overall structure of the article. Fishal 19:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the input. I'll add mythical civilizations to the outline right now. I'll add Axial Age to the "History" section. Or do you think it would better belong in the "theories" section? It's more a theory about a specific period in the history of civilization than a theory about the nature of civilization itself (like unilineal evolution, Marxism, diffusionism, etc). And one of the main things I'm trying to do is separate facts (definitions and uncontested archaeological evidence) from the big spectrum of theories. Currently it's all comingled in a very confusing fashion. Anyway, thank you very much for your help. Fishal 14:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enki

Feel free to re-nominate the article at and await a review. Although i suggest you clean up the one sentence paragraphs, get rid of the [1] external links like this and use the ref format. Get rid of the 'in popular culture' section as it is a trivia section, see WP:TRIVIA, format the web webreferences accordingly to include a name, publisher, and retrieved date. At the moment it would not pass a GA review in my opinion but with some work it will get there. M3tal H3ad 10:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amatlei Bas Karnebo

My "source" was this: [2] obviously an apologetic work of this like doesn't carry much weight, which is why I didn't bring it into the article. He says the name is in some form of ancient records (I'm not 1oo% sure it was sumerian). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolf2191 (talk • contribs) 19:37, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

The Documentary Hypothesis (death thereof) and archaeology

John, I've reverted your recent addition to the DH article, in which you wrote that the collapse of the DH consensus was lin ked in some way to archaeological discoveries (presumably post-Albrightean). I'm not aware of any reason for thinking there's a conenction - the challenge to the DH was entirely methodological so far as I know, with people questioing whether the use of distinct terms for God erally indicated distinct authors, etc etc. On the archaeological front, the 70s saw a revolution in archaeological theory which led to (or aided in the emergence of) minimalism, but Lemche et. al. were far from the only ones to question the DH - they were a distinct minority. So I'd link the fall of biblical archaeology to the rise of minimalism, but not to the demise of the DH or the re-emeergence of spllementary and framgmentary hypotheses. But if you have evidecne to support your view (or if I've misunderstood it), please let me know. Cheers, CP 00:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by PiCo (talk • contribs) 10:06, August 29, 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Documentary Hypothesis

Thanks for the speedy response John. Yes, your point is clear. But I'm nor sure it's relevant to the DH. The Dh relates specifically to the Pentateuch - defined in the broadest possible way, it's the idea that the five books are based on distinct source-documents, each complete in itself. Arguments about the Court History and the DtrH are therefore irrelevant.

There are some interesting recent studies about the DtrH, based on the canonisation process in Hellenistic times - the idea is to take the earliest written references to the texts and reconstruct their history from that. The basic premise, I guess, is that this is as close as we can get to the actual books involved without physical texts. I believe the resulting thesis is that the DtrH, as a collection of histories, dates from the 1st century BC - far later even than Hezekiah! Of course, this doesn't detract from the notion that the Court History may contain earlier material, but it does stress the idea that the CH is a hypothetical document. Cheers, CP 00:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by PiCo (talk • contribs) 13:45, August 29, 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Kasekhemui

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kasekhemui, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kasekhemui is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kasekhemui, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. Cheers, CP 00:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of William McNiel

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on William McNiel, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because William McNiel is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting William McNiel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. Cheers, CP 00:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishal (talk • contribs) 19:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Enki

The article Enki you nominated as a good article has failed , see Talk:Enki for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Cheers, CP 00:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pelasgians

You seemed to have placed a passage from Herodotus in the introductory paragraphs of the Pelasgians article. I recommend that you remove the passage since it does not belong there. Either place the passage in the Herodotus section of the article or remove it completely. Though I appreciate your boldness in adding content to an article, it would be best to discuss about the edits you wish to make. Deucalionite 15:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ecological footprint

Living planet index is already linked in the body, wp style guide indicates that an article should not be multiply linked. --Belg4mit 19:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tiamat

I removed the alleged Sumerian derivation for Tiamat that you inserted, which gave the misleading impression that it were supported by the Burkert work referenced. It is not. If you have a reference for the Sumerian, do please put it back, with a <ref></ref> footnote. --Wetman 07:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenicians ethnic identity

Hi

I just read what you wrote on the article talk page, i.e. Phoenicia talk page, about the Canaanite origin of them-as you know, there are 7 ancient nations which were part of the Canaanite group, or, and more generally, from an Akkadian ancestry. So, which of them you think the Phoenicians was? (i.e. Edomites, etc) Best--Gilisa 06:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved my reply to my talk page.

Emissions trading and Carbon tax

Hi, I thought your interesting xref to public perceptions of a carbon tax would be better suited for the carbon tax article, so I moved it over there. I recognise there is a need a for a discussion on the pros & cons of both (and how they complement each other) & I'll try and address that sometime - probably under the trading article. Until then I've put in a simple reference to carbon in the trading article. Ephebi 13:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carbon_tax&diff=171421231&oldid=170888190

I note that there have been a couple more pro-tax articles added in there - interesting but could do with some balance as I don't see anything from an economist's or sustainable development perspective. Ephebi 10:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of watercourses in Western Australia Split

You proposed splitting [List of watercourses in Western Australia] into "Ramsar Hydrological Regions" some time back. It has never been split and is now one of the longest and hardest to use pages on wikipedia. I don't know what "Ramsar Hydrological Regions", but I'm proposing it be split. If we can do it by the method you suggest, my idea would be simply by alphabetic subpages. Mbisanz (talk) 03:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biomass table

There are two questions in Talk:Biomass regarding the biomass table that you added a while ago. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 06:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal history of Western Australia

Hi John - just compared the current and earlier versions of this article. Sad to see this article now only contains the word "discrimination" once. (Racial Discrimination Act) I am hoping that you will eventually go back and work with the other editors to create a more detailed and informative article. Fitting into WP guidelines in not always easy - and at times editors are not focused on bettering the encyclopaedia. Your knowledge of the topic looks valuable and well-worth including. SmithBlue (talk) 03:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could imagine you would be mightily pissed off as to the fate of the aboriginal history article - deleting will not happen - it is a matter of working out - would you like to engage in any way about the resultant 3 articles? If so could you pleas email me so I can explain some of the issues that I do not wish to air here - otherwise my apologies for what has happened - but at least you have the opportunity - if you wish to engage further - either by email, at the article talk page, my talk page, or - otherwise what about a coffee sometime User:JarrahTree 01:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case 'that aboriginals use it' - in that form - it should be somewhere else - someone needs to start an off wiki blog or web site - or something like that is not an encyclopedia - as in that form it didnt conform to wikipedia standards and someone else would have probably been a lot more brutal than i - being an anthro student at uwa in the days of the berndts and basil s. The offer for a coffee is still open if you are in Perth - and I would prefer off wiki to explain the issues it would take too long to explain via email/etc especially if you are on the move soon - please email me at email this user on the talk page - cheers User:JarrahTree 03:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current format is here: -

One meetup for about 2 hours should solve everything relative to the issue in one go if you have the time and location not too far from Perth metro :) User:JarrahTree 03:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very useful to know whether you were interested or not in such a meetup as it might be a good avenue to explain things I am not prepared to discuss on wikipedia talk pages - and explain the background to some issues without offending others - and also clarifying the madness behind the method - if you prefer not to - thats fine I would respect your sense of privacy ok - but the opportunity is there if you are interested. Not showing an email account also limits my capacity to explain - cheers User:JarrahTree 07:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that mate - I'm reverting my talk page to sustain your privacy - I'll call you soon - cheers User:JarrahTree 07:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pillars of the Church

The article that you started with the above title has been nominated for WP:AFD, on the basis that it is WP:OR. However it looks to me as if you had sources for what you wrote. If you did, I would suggest that you immediately add them to the article. I have no strong view on its correctness and have not investigated how much has been added sicne you worked on it. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At this stage I have seen nothing that would make me change my vote for deletion. The vagueness of the statements ("seems to have referred") remains and the references added are also vague - not only are there no direct quotes, there aren't even page numbers. There's no evidence that any of the references refer to the phrase "Pillars of the Church", and as such this is essentially a coatrack article. Finally, many of these references strike me as dubious ("Key to Unlocking"... "Hidden History"...) and so adding them has created more problems than it solved. StAnselm (talk) 06:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the effort you're putting in - I just don't think it's worth it for this particular article. I mean, I disagree with the fundamental premise, that "pillars of the church" designated a particular group of people. There's no evidence that I can see that this was the case. StAnselm (talk) 07:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to find that your article has been deleted. If you had some substantial sources in what the Early Fathers said about the subject, you may consider re-creating it. However, you would need substantial published sources or website to cite. It pays to click the "watch" tab on all article that you create or undertake major edits of, so that you can defedn your work. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juris Zarins

I've noticed you've been adding his theories regarding Canaanites and Proto-Semites. Has he received any support in the academic community? Also, how does his theory relate to Proto-Afro-Asiatic?--Yolgnu (talk) 01:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already knew that. What I'm asking is whether Zarins places the Afro-Asiatic urheimat in the normal Ethiopia/Sudan, or in the Middle East. And I'd like to see some sources that support him, as Wikipedia is infested with Nostraticists, and so naturally an attempt to place an urheimat in the Fertile Crescent must be treated with suspicion.--Yolgnu (talk) 00:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Have had school holidays to deal with - meant to ring, sorry about that. Whats the chance of this week or next? Satu Suro 02:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Youre still around - how long - possible to get a quick meetup - or too late? Satu Suro 06:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry to not have caught up in a whole month - thanks for your patience Satu Suro 07:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Views on Evolution.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Views on Evolution.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Community GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed Community and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon footprints image

Hey, I noticed the image you made at the ecologic footprint-article. Nice work there btw. You may however want to take a look at the image I made at the carbon footprints page. Some noteworthy info on the pic and its description is given here aswell (which defies certain of the points you raised). Feel free to update the image if you want to (at present its hand drawn which doesn't look good. Perhaps the info at the image may give you some insight which you may mention to the Australian government or so. You may also take a look at my blog if you wish; see http://kvdp.blogspot.com

Thanks, 81.246.142.87 (talk) 18:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Ages

Dear Johh Croft - see comments below. Your discusiion was sensible and I wonder if you'd be willing to weigh in now and try to improve the situation at Dark Ages.

I have just read through 50 pages of Talk on Dark Ages, and it reveals a Wiki article that is in deep trouble. 29 people contributed comments complaining about the one-sided polemics against the term "Dark Ages." 7 people argued that to talk of the Dark Ages is invalid and that the article need only represent this one point of view -- but mostly the rejecttion of diverse views is the work of two people, stbalbach and Doric Loon. Loon compliments stbalbach for "assiduously maintainging and defending this article over the years," meaning, beating back all other contributors and defending their personal POV. They don't seem to be ashamed that during this time the artcle lost its status as a Good Article, way back in Mary 2006. Some defense! In the talk pages, stbalbach and Loon state openly that they consider the Dark Ages not dark, and that their opinion is the only valid one, and the only one that may be included. For ex, stbalbach: "Its impossible to defend the use of the term (Dark Ages) with what we now know." Any alternate, referenced quotes or information are undone and dismissed as not good references. This is Orwell's 1984 - some pigs are more equal than others. Marskell said it very well back in 2005, and its still true now in 2008: "It's disappointing to see revisionism has won out. 'the middle ages were not dark, therefore there can be no causes of darkness...you see stbalback beecoming a crusader...it is still possible to walk into a respectable university and hear the Dark Ages discussed...unfortunately readers of wikipedia won't be able to find out...." One poor user of Wiki wrote his frustration on teh talk page, that none of the information he was hoping for on The Dark AGes was here, just polemics. His complaint was trashed. This page is crying out for arbitration, to stop a small number of people from domineering and preventing balanced POV. It's time to rebel against the dictatorial rule of stbalbach and his henchwomen. I am fairly new to Wikipedia. Judging from stbalbach's page, he is very active - does that make him impregnable or is there something that can be done? There is really no point in trying as individuals to improve the article while he is in place as the self-appointed Dictator of Truth. Now is the time for concerned people to speak up. If you agree that stbalbach's reign of power should end, and the article should include references that support the term Dark Ages, and explain why, so as to have a balanced POV, please speak up now. More experienced Wikipedians - what can be done? --Cimicifugia (talk) 21:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Cimicifugia[reply]

Image:Highlight Findings of the WA S0E 2007 report

Hello, I'm a Japanese wikipedian. I saw your "Highlight Findings of the WA S0E 2007 report" file on the article,Ecological footprint. Because I want to use this file for Japanese Wikipedia, I uploaded it into Comonns (Category:Environment, filename Highlight Findings of the WA S0E 2007 report .gif). Thank you.--Janus01 (talk) 04:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MesopotamiaTrends.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MesopotamiaTrends.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the image for deletion because it was an orphan, and Wikipedia generally does not host orphan images. You have since added the image to the the Mesopotamia article, so I will withdraw my nomination. -Regards Nv8200p talk 02:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Genealogy of Later Mesopotamian Gods.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Genealogy of Later Mesopotamian Gods.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:03, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(replying to message on my talk page) - thanks for your message. There are a number of problems with this image:

You need to choose an actual license for the image, not just say that it's OK to use on Wikimedia. You can find a list of licenses commonly used in this situation at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators. I recommend {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}.
The image should have been uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, not to Wikipedia. The Commons' upload form makes it pretty easy to upload your image and select a license for it at the same time, so you should consider reuploading it there.
The image was saved in JPEG format, which is not suitable for diagrams. As you can see, lines and text that should be crisp and clear are blurry because of this. SVG would be the most appropriate format for the image, but PNG is also very good and the existing JPEG is better than nothing.

I hope that helps clarify the issue - please let me know if there's anything else I can help explain. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New (updated) image uploaded

I have uploaded a new image which has the 2008 Ecological Footprint data - please check this and let me know if you would like to see any changes to it.--Travelplanner (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James N. Gardner listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect James N. Gardner. Since you had some involvement with the James N. Gardner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Six (talk) 11:57, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whadjuk1.jpg

Can you please clarify where you got this map? We have received an email from an organization which says they own the copyright of it. Stifle (talk) 09:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-history of the southern Levant and Canaan

An old edit of yours on Canaan came up at WP:Talk:Canaan and I note that you inserted the same material into Pre-history of the southern Levant in the Early and Middle Bronze Age section. You've got links to two references that are no longer available, and even if there were, I think the material there needs better referencing. Can you help? Thanks. dougweller (talk) 15:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uruk.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uruk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, Wikipedia is not a repository for user created images. If there is a target article you'd like to supply for this image, please post it here and I (or another admin) will be happy to restore it so that it can be put in the article. If you simply would like to have it restored so that you can retrieve a copy of it for your files, it can be temporarily un-deleted for such purposes as well. Skier Dude (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whadjug map

Thank you for your post, some time ago about the Whadjuk map. It would be difficult for anyone to have copywrite on this map as it was traced and then redrawn using Powerpoint polygons (hand-drawn by me) copying a public domain base map of Western Australia. I then added the colour of the Polygons and saved the file to a jpeg format before uploading it to Wikipedia. The publications I made use of for the sources was a 1979 150th Anniversary Atlas of Human Endeavour, produced by Western Australian Government Print, and a South Australian map produced by Tindale in the 1930s. To get the map restored can you help? Thany thanks. John D. Croft (talk) 18:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. We had an email from an Australian government source claiming copyright in the map, but it was clear (from subsequent emails) that the map they claimed you copied was completely different from the one you used.

The map has not been deleted. Stifle (talk) 08:37, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pythia

As the GAR reviewer, I am informing you that Pythia, an article that you worked on, was delisted in GA sweeps process. My suggestions are available on the GAR page. Hope they are useful for article improvement.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 17:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sumer3.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sumer3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent editing on Proto Semitic and Afroasiatic subjects

Hi. Thanks for working on those articles. They need it. I reverted one edit, where you deleted all reference to a theory of Bernal. I write here in order to mention that I do not wish to argue the case for this theory and I am not a supporter of it. It is however a real theory and in fact a well known one, for better or worse. Bernal is not a specialist linguist, and of course he is controversial, but he is serious enough to be cited by Lionel Bender in a respectful but disagreeing way. I do not think we can delete such things from the record. In any case, please see the talkpage discussions that have already taken place. I think the aim has to be not to give the theory undue weight.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 21:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Thank you for noting possible improvements in my map, as I will change it shortly, but I did not understand what you meant by "Secondly the territories added by Sargon was the area you have shown byt the previous state was not the Akkadian Empire, but in fact the Empire of Lugalzagessi of Umma whose Empire Sargon took over. It was the states of Southern Iraq only and did not extend as far north as Nineveh." Please explain. --Interchange88 19:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dragon Dreaming

I have nominated Dragon Dreaming, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragon Dreaming. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:22, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm?

I reverted this [3] - since now the sentence (to me) made little sense, and seemed to reverse the meaning of the original sentence. Could you explain what the idea was? Its possible that it made the same statement as before, but just in a overly complex manner? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change denial as it is used in the article, is about disinformation campaigns created by people with a hidden financial interest in keeping the status quo. Where as your sentence seems to say that it is a campaign trying to show science as having hidden financial interests. (this wouldn't really be denial (imho)) - have i misunderstood? --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 23:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Composition of the Earth

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Composition of the Earth. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Earth. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Earth - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -- Boing! said Zebedee 12:31, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong talk page

Hi John. My talk page is at User talk:Vaughan Pratt. Wikipedia notifies me when anything is posted there, which is not the case for things posted at Talk:Vaughan Pratt which is the talk page for the Wikipedia article about me, a different thing. You might want to move your post at the latter to the former. --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 04:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed additions to Patriarchy article

Hi John. I am very happy that you commented on the Patriarchy article. No one comments there--there is an editor who ran roughshod over the article for more than 2 years and he was finally banned for one year. This ends, I think, in June. I hope he didn't intimidate you and that you will work with me on any additions to the article. From what I have seen of him, he thinks the world should be more oppressive than it is, especially of women. He also makes veiled threats that sound Nazi-ish. You are brave to put your identity on your user page. I try to stay anonymous because of the hostility. Thanks again for your comment.--Hammy64000 (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the higher solubility of the ocean?

You mean "the higher solubility in the ocean"? Solubility of what? William M. Connolley (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kish (Sumer)

Hi, a few years ago there were wild, unourced claims in the article, which were deleted by me. Looking at it now, the article has grown back, with what seem to be unsourced,vthough not wild, claims. Would you say however, that the claims are at least true, or not?

"Little specific is known about the history of Kish before Sargon of Akkad, who came from the area. The Sumerian king list states that it was the first city to have kings following the deluge. It also names 40 kings of Kish spread over four dynasties. Of those, none earlier than Enmebaragesi has been attested by archaeological finds. The Third Dynasty of Kish is interesting in that it begins with the assumption to the monarchial power of "Big man" (Sumerian Lu = Man, Gal = Big) of a woman, previously a Tavern Kepper, Kubau, the only case in Mesopotamian History in which a woman has ruled in her own right. She was later Divinised as the goddess Kheba."

{The footnote "3" that comes a sentence or two later may verify the later sentences, but it it doesn't verify the text I've just quoted.} Thanks, Rich Peterson24.7.28.186 (talk) 10:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I just realized this is a dumb question.24.7.28.186 (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cilician Gates and Cicilian Gates

You have created the article Cicilian Gates on 18 Jan.2007. While using a convert template on the article, I noticed that the same article with a slightly different name also exists in Wikipedia; Cilician Gates. Normally it is required to tag for merging, but I prefer to inform instead. Have a nice day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Ancient Israel and Judah

Glad to see your comments there. I think this was unnecessary [4] An RfC has been suggested. Dougweller (talk) 17:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Ancient Israel and Judah

John, you very recently left a comment on this article. I'm having trouble with an editor who questions the sources and seems unable to understand them - would you be willing to join in? I warn you it's frustrating. And can you suggest perhaps where I can find some interested and well-informed editors for this article? PiCo (talk) 04:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAR Akkadian Empire

An article that you have been involved in editing, Akkadian Empire has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments good article reassessment page . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, thanks for your reply. There are many problems with the article. If you respond to them immediately, I can give you some time before I delist it. However, the other thing I noted, which is more problematic, is that you were the one who promoted it to GA, even though GA rules strictly state that editors who are involved with the article cannot do that. Can you please respond to that? Maybe you acted in good faith, so that's why I did not put it in my review, but if there is no good answer to that, I will have to delist it right away. BTW, if you are interested, I can post some more relevant literature in which you might have a look. Just let me know. -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need a second opinion

I'm concerned about edits such as {http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proto-Semitic_language&diff=prev&oldid=416226693] which seem to be being made by this editor in a number of articles. Here [5] he even changed cited text. Maybe this does represent current thought, but I'd like a 2nd opinion and you seem to be involved with this area. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 17:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, there's obviously no problem and the one edit that concerned me was an error. Dougweller (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Canaanite religion

I think I know what you wrote there, but could you just edit it yourself so it makes sense please? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eve

Years ago you made some edits to the article on Eve, but a couple things are not clear. In the section on Gregory of Tours, it sounds as though you are quoting something, but it's not clear where the quote starts and ends or whom it is quoting. You do put quotes around "Male and female he created them and called their name Adam," as though it's a quote from the Bible, but it's not. Later, you added something about Adam cursing Eve, which didn't happen, so I'm wondering whether it's a mistake. Could you please clarify these points? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 12:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goonininup

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Goonininup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Goonininup

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Goonininup, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Environmental Barnstar
		For your work as principal contributor to Gaia hypothesis. AshLin (talk) 17:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Leeuwin current 1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leeuwin current 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Neolithic Revolution (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Southern Highlands and Western Highlands

Civilization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Settlement

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My demo edit in reply to your proposal about scientists and climate change

Hi John, Have you been keeping up with the discussion you started at List of scientists opposing.... etc etc ? Did you get a chance to review my demo edit in the link I provided? What did you think? NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 01:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abiogenesis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cells and Vesicles

Convection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mantle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abiogenesis edits

When you get a moment, can you drop by Talk:Abiogenesis? I pulled down the Eck and Dayhoff Sciece paper (from 1966) and it doesn't mention anything about the three fundamental principles of abiogensis. I'm also not sure I agree with your summary of the Miller-Urey experiments, and that could probably stand a better citation as well.

Thanks! Garamond Lethe (talk) 03:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Niue sword

I've been wondering what a Niue sword is. After all, Niue is a nation in the Pacific. Is the type of sword really called that (in the source) or is that a typo? I figure it might be named after some place in France, but "Niue" doesn't quite sound (actually, look) French, either. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have the article where this is mentioned? If it's not too much trouble, I'd really be grateful if you could satisfy my curiosity. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Noongar people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Augusta

Sea Peoples (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Troas

Sons of God (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to El

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mesopotamia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ubaid

Sumer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pantheon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Aboriginal cultures of Western Australia, John D. Croft!

Wikipedia editor Sfan00 IMG just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Would suggest looking through Anthropological collections on this if possible.

To reply, leave a comment on Sfan00 IMG's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of evolutionary history of life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adapa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deluge and Sage

Sage (Sophos) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Deluge

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of oracular statements from Delphi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alaric (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WAClimates.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WAClimates.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You disputed that I created the map of Western Australian climates from Scratch using Powerpoint. This is possible - as powerpoint allows maps to be created - I have used it for many maps I have uploaded into the web. The maps are created using the polygon tool in powerpoint with the various colours created as overlays. As a powerpoint it is then saved as a jpeg file which I have then uploaded.

I hope this explains the method I have used. I would appreciate it if this satisfies you that you withdraw the map from deletion. John D. Croft (talk) 06:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the map for the purpose of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2013_January_28#File:WAClimates.jpg. I think you may have misremembered this map, because I still believe that it is far too complex to have been created with the powerpoint polygon tool. Please comment at the deletion discussion if you have anything further to add! Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anunnaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Francis Underhill Macy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Georgia

Joanna Macy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arne Naess

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Limits to Growth

I only know of the book by reputation and it always seems to be hovering at around #4 or 5 on my reading list. So I'm not qualified to edit substantive article text here, or even to evaluate your comments at the talk page. I just wanted to thank you for the first substantive comments - right or wrong - that have been made in quite awhile. Glad to know there's a knowledgeable editor still watching the page. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of confidence. And good luck with your reading. John D. Croft (talk) 11:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milky Way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Debate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Historical background of the New Testament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Archelaus

Inanna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Damuzi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Historicity of Jesus

Hi John, I think there has been a bit of confusion over at the Historicity of Jesus talk page. You did add a comment explaining your reversion/addition of Eisenman's views, but when you did so you added your comment to the top of the talk page. New additions typically go on the bottom of the talk page, so I moved your comment there and added a reply: [6]. I hope you will respond there. Cheers. --Akhilleus (talk) 22:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Akkadian Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dark Ages

Delphi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gaia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sumer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubaid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenicia

I'd appreciate your comments at Talk:Phoenicia#Legacy section. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Afroasiatic Urheimat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Proto-Afro-Asiatic

Halfan culture (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Proto-Afro-Asiatic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Palestine

This edit removed Template:History of Palestine from the History of Palestine article. There's no edit summary so it's unclear why it was removed. Was it an accident ? If not, could you provide your reasoning ? Thanks. Sean.hoyland - talk 05:30, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bronze Age collapse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joppa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gaia spore

Hello! I noticed you once commented on the Gaia spore article talk page. I have been unable to locate any sources or evidence of it as a term outside of Wikipedia (and a few sources that cite Wikipedia). As such, I have tagged the article as Original Research. However if you have any insight into where the term arose or verifiable sources which use the term, I would greatly appreciate the information. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 14:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sumerian King List, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Genesis and Enoch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sumer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Martu and Muscat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Encephalization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicxulub (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sustainable development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipping point (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Historical Jesus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Saviour and Messia

Eve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ki

Ninlil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ki

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abiogenesis

Just a note to thank you for your additions to the Abiogenesis article. They are very well written, Wikified, concise and well referenced. Please hang around, and perhaps even take a shot at the Astrobiology article. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

in country==Disambiguation link notification for April 21==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abiogenesis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Isua and Scripps Institute

Adad-nirari II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Phoenician

Elohim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Genesis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Back in country?

You still there or are you here? satusuro 04:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Satusuro. No I am editing this from Germany. I am back in WA on 16th November. John D. Croft (talk) 04:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok - suspect a well reasoned discussion about the pinjarra item might not happen very quickly, be patient. satusuro 05:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Civilization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubaid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread_and_evolution_of_Denisovans.jpg

Hello John,

re: Denisovans, picture and key (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denisovan#mediaviewer/File:Spread_and_evolution_of_Denisovans.jpg) show a typo: It's "Homo heidelbergensis", not "H. hiedelbergensis" ...

Best. --JFritsche (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spread and evolution of Denisovans.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spread and evolution of Denisovans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 12:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of articles where you've added a self-published work

See [7] and [8]. If it was someone else I'd probably just delete it all, but as it's you... Dougweller (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Late Bronze Age collapse, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thebes, Megiddo and Hazor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

late Bronze Age collapse

Hi, see links I just added at Talk:Late Bronze Age collapse. Dougweller (talk) 11:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect blanking

Hello. I see that you've blanked the redirect Japeth, apparently intending to remove the redirect. Please be noted that blanking a page is not tantamount to a deletion. I have reverted your blanking for now. If you wish to delete the redirect, please take it to WP:RFD. If you have a question or comment, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KJ^Discuss? 11:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Late Bronze Age collapse, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Raamses and Timaeus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cro-Magnon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Race. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your question

John, thank you for your time. I am happy to have the discussion in the right place.

My question is meant to be asking are there any other Origin belief systems? Or does anyone believe in something other than creation and evolution. Using the term "Creation" to mean God made it and "Evolution" to mean the common ancestry of all life.

I know what Darwinists teach about Creationists. I am a creationist. And a fundamental Christian. I believe the Bible is true. I also believe in gradual changes over time. I just don't think those changes can make the leap from say fish to frog. I understand that over generations dogs can change their spots (evolve). But I do not believe a reptile laid a bird egg. Nor that life sprung from the goo. Nor that the universe started from a laws of physics deifying, anti entropy having, Imaginary time big bang. Seriously google "Imaginary time" its what Hawking believes in over the Bible SMH.

Also so you know until proven by Columbus, Bible believers were the only people who believed the earth was round. Isaiah 40:21-22—“the circle of the earth.” Many Darwinists and anti-Christians are to eager to lie about what the Bible really says.

Again thanks John. And if you see or know where this discussion is happening, please let me know. --Kaptinavenger (talk) 04:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC) (I copied this from my talk page.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaptinavenger (talk • contribs)

What topics are off limits in science today because of their inherent connection to Biblical Principles?

Mr. Croft. Thank you again for your well researched letter. I have been thinking on the topic of Science, and Scientists.

I suggest that Sin is not being taken seriously in science from most perspectives. Note Sin has about two lines of etymology, the rest is Religious study, not even etymologists like the word. The Topic is rather off limits to serious scientists, and I suggest this is because of its Bibllyness, though Sin cannot be denied. Not only in one definition, but in all that I can think of. Sin permiates through everyting I have seen to one digree or another, and is researched in few fields.

But how odd?! Truth is discussed or studied in almost every serious science. And Truth is misunderstood. All kinds of scientific theory's yet line number two of Truth clearly begins to cleverly discribe a Lie. Could there be more sin in Truth than there is in Sin?

I do love science, and still I believe in the Magic of Words.

If you get my meaning Sir. Again and again thank you for Your Time, I consider your gifts precious. --Kaptinavenger (talk) 10:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. while comparing Truth and Evolution I made an interesting observation, the science of Truth would suggest understanding the opposite of a thing is important to understand the reality of a thing. Hence a Lie being described on line two of Truth. Yet on Evolution , Devolution is not even a notion. --Kaptinavenger (talk) 11:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John, do you mind if I ask, who is Mugwamp? Could I read some of Mugwamps writings? Thanks --Kaptinavenger (talk) 11:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A note on Pythagorus, there is a line there that says "(He) was the first person known to have taught the earth was spherical" yet the Author of Job was teaching about the chuwg before the Greek was born? The Hebrews had the first writings but the Greeks have the first teachers? --Kaptinavenger (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My science on this matter rather is pointing towards, the author of Job knowing not only trying to teach the roundness of the earth but also the creators affinity towards the tools of carpentry. I am filled with joy from the research you have inspired. --Kaptinavenger (talk) 13:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

creationism-evolution controversy

Could you change the title and URL of the "creation-evolution controversy" article to "creationism-evolution controversy"? I'm not authorized to make such a change; do you know anyone that is? Do you have any objections to the name change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scienceteacher3k (talk • contribs) 10:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaia Foundation

The article Gaia Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Organization with no sense of notability for Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC) --Work in progress John D. Croft (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gaia Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gaia & Earth System Science

Hello, I noticed in your profile that you are an expert in ecology systems. Would you mind taking a look at the Earth system science article talk page please? There is an ongoing conflict there regarding the relevance of comparing Gaia and ESS and the tone of the text. Thank you. BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, John - Thanks so much! Yes, there has been quite a struggle at that article! The article is, as of today, open to editing again. One thing you could do is to take a look at my latest version, and possibly put the article back there, if you think the material is good and well-cited - no additions have been made at all in the days since, just subtractions (and all of that my material), and I am perfectly happy to have lots of work done by others on what I was doing with it, but have been bothered by the continuous and repeated removal of so much material that was obviously germane to the subject by a few editors.

Since I discovered that Toby Tyrrell himself removed all the Gaia material from the Wiki ESS entry, with a brief note calling it "irrelevant", I have felt that, instead of trying to hide this ESS-Gaia relationship like Tyrrell and others have been doing, there should be some more in-depth discussion of the interrelationship, with a full range of viewpoints given. I did some further study of my own, and was actually surprised at what I found..... very best, Terradactyl (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark matter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laniakea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treaty of Tordesillas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Holland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Inanna

added links pointing to Pantheon and Ubaid

March equinox

added a link pointing to Tammuz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deep ecology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ego. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Australian archaeology

added a link pointing to Goldfields

Prehistory of Australia

added a link pointing to Kimberley

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gaia hypothesis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archaean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whadjuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vendetta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mesopotamia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of the rights of women, and increasing severity in the treatment of slaves<ref>Fensham, F. Charles (19620, "Widow, Orphan, and the Poor in Ancient near Eastern Legal and Wisdom Literature"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not forget

WP:RS or WP:CITE when adding material! JarrahTree 12:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC) You have been an editor long enough to realise that adding uncited text can be seen as WP:OR and can be reverted, you havent even added links, in all WP:AGF whats the problem?[reply]

The other thing, as you havent archived your talk page for close to 10 years, I have changed some of the older user names earlier in your talk page, you really should archive for a cleaner page - cheers JarrahTree 14:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal history of Western Australia

I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have added copyright content copied from http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/mar/11/aboriginal-land-rights-in-western-australia-timeline, a copyright web page. — Diannaa (talk) 03:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found some more, this time copied from http://slwa.wa.gov.au/federation/fed/011_abor.htm. or legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inuit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chukchi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Last universal ancestor into Abiogenesis. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abiogenesis

added a link pointing to Anaerobic

Last universal ancestor

added a link pointing to Anaerobic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of geography

added links pointing to Punt and Kush

Sea Peoples

added links pointing to Greek and Timaeus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sea Peoples and Atlantis

Hi John, at Sea Peoples you wrote: "The theory was influenced by Plato's account of the Ατλάντειο, found in his books, the Critias and Timaeus (θάλασσοι = Thalassoi (= Sea People in Greek))."

I have removed it as there is no source. Please feel free to add it back with a source. It would be particularly helpful if the source could include a specific quote supporting the sentence.

Regards, Oncenawhile (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Geogene (talk) 01:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now it's just close paraphrase (some of that text is still identical to the source). I don't understand why, instead of copy-paste, you don't simply read the paper, then come back later and summarize it in your own words? That's the recommended practice. Copy pasting blocks of text into an article and then re-working it "just enough" is actually more trouble than it's worth because it tends to invite CV problems. Geogene (talk) 03:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abiogenesis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akatsuki. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, John D. Croft. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis creation narrative

You really need to add a source for that recent edit, or else it will probably be deleted. PiCo (talk) 10:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanimo culture

It's not a page.Xx236 (talk) 13:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vanimo culture

Hello John D. Croft,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vanimo culture for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vanimo culture

Hi John D. Croft, I think it was a redirect to the Vanimo language which is still existing. It had the following lines

==Vanimo Culture==

See Vanimo language

I flagged it up 3 days ago during page review, and I put a CSD A3 tag, as they was not content in it, apart form a single redirect and it was changed to a formal redirect with the same purpose: Vanimo culture.

Hope that helps. scope_creep (talk) 12:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In view

Of long standing uncorrected and uncited material issues in the article what you are adding to, standard attention to WP:RS and WP:CITE would be much appreciated.

Also your talk page is getting difficult to negotiate ( 11 years plus on one page) - well worth trying to archive, or even ask help to archive JarrahTree 08:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Timeline of Aboriginal history of Western Australia

In spite of multiple warnings, you continue to add copyright material to this wiki. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of oracular statements from Delphi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alaric. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content, as you did at List of oracular statements from Delphi. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John D. Croft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing Wikipedia, in violation for using copyright material. I was unanware that the material was copyright and inserted, I felt proper referencing format for the material I inserted in good faith. I felt that the material inserted definitely added to the value of the article. It was claimed that I was previously warned that this was against Wikipecia policy but have been unaware of any previous copyright violation. If this had been brought to my attention I would have acted immediately to remove the offending material, as I try always to adhere to Wikipedia guides. If there is anything I can do to be restored as a bona fide Wikipedia contributer can you let me know. Yours faithfully John D. Croft (talk) 01:38, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure I understand your claims. You've certainly been previously warned; the word "copyright" appears on this page no less than one hundred and twenty-eight times, including the phrase "This is your final warning." Your claim that you were unaware that the material was in "copyright and inserted" makes no sense; your first edit in that series was a simple cut and paste from the source. You can't be unblocked until you acknowledge the problem and set suggestions on how your behavior will change. Kuru (talk) 02:20, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John D. Croft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been reviewing the behaviour for which I have been blocked. I wish to assert to all editors that the use of copywriten material will not occur again. It has always been my intention to improve the content of wikipedia is improved, as the many posts of appreciation from wikipedia editors shows. Regards to all, John D. Croft (talk) 21:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In your previous unblock request you said "I was unanware (sic) that the material was copyright ...". Consequently we need much more than a bland assurance. You need to explain how the inserted material breached copyright and what steps you will take to ensure there are no further breaches of our copyright policy. Just Chilling (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Eblalibrary.jpg

The file File:Eblalibrary.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Enki4.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Enki4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Proto-civilisation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proto-civilisation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-civilisation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Coin945 (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]