User talk:John Chamberlain
Welcome
[edit]
|
Fair use rationale for File:Alfred Otto Carl Nier.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Otto Carl Nier.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Warrant (of Payment)
[edit]John, Thank you for creating the article on Warrents. Until last week warrents seemed to be little different than paper checks and of interest only to specialists like me. Before I retired from a county government (not in California) I was responsible for processing warrants issued by the county treasurer's dept and by taxing districts like school districts. When I computerized their old manual "Warrants Register" (printed on large sheets of thick paper), I learned how warrants are issued, redeemed, voided, canceled, or stopped. Every morning a courier from the collecting bank (now Bank of America) would bring to the county treasurer's dept a long tray of warrants that had been redeemed the previous night, plus a mag tape containing the computer data on those warrants, and a computer listing of those transactions. The disbursements officer in the treasurer's dept would cut a check drawn on the county's checking account at the bank. The courier then took the check to the bank to pay the bank for the redeemed warrants. I was told that sometimes the payment would be delayed and the bank would collect interest on the amount due. Now suddenly banks in California say they will not redeem state warrants and warrants are headline news.
I added some of these facts to the article you created. Because your description of warrants is quite different from my experience, I am assuming that what you described is how the British define it and that you got that definition from the 1971 OED. I am not acquainted with how the British use the word, but from your description it sounds like what we call drafts. Unfortunately I could not find an accessible OED online. Am I correct in my assumption that your words came from the 1971 OED (2 volumes)? Greensburger (talk) 07:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
> It's very simple: a financial warrant is an order to a particular person to deliver money to someone else at a particular time and it doesn't matter whether its in England or America... too specific to the version of warrants being given out by California. [John]
John, the definition you cited is consistent with California usage in which the Controller orders the disbursement officer to pay money to the warrant holder in due course on or after the maturity date. This is also consistent with usage in the Washington state county where I used to work. I emailed the disbursement officer I worked with and he confirmed that my description was also correct for Washington state, including the distinction between "regular warrants" and "registered warrants". Sometimes the Feds also issue warrants and one Wiki contributor said the U.S. military pays in warrants. The references I cited are from California, but similar procedures are probably practiced in other states and in the UK. Governments copy procedures and laws from each other. You may be able to find similar references for other states and countries and maybe for the Feds. Greensburger (talk) 21:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
> ... the real meaning is more general.
I agree and have changed the lead to be in accord with the OED you cited. I modified it to clarify that there are three parties involved - the person who issues the warrant, the person who is ordered to pay, and the payee.
Thank you for your historical knowledge that warrants were used to move money around in war situations. In response to your suggestion, I added a historical section and found a reference to George Washington's warrant books.
Regarding whether modern warrants are debt instruments, please check the accounting glossary definition of Warrant that says warrants are debt instruments. Clearly not the kind of warrant orders to pay that you mentioned, so I described both.
As to whether modern warrants look like checks and clear through the banks, the regular warrants issued by the county where I worked looked exactly like checks and had MICR numbers and were called warrants. And that was in Washington state, not California. California warrants also look like checks and also have MICR numbers. Somebody put an image of one in this Warrants article, but it was speedy deleted because of a copyright problem. Greensburger (talk) 03:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Citation mania/tagging plague
[edit]Hi John -- it's encouraging to learn that I am not the only one who perceives this to be a problem. Indeed, I think it is one of the two or three largest currently undiscussed problems on Wikipedia; as you correctly point out, readers far outnumber editors, and meta-tags are for editors. I think all this stuff belongs on the talk page (or ideally in a third space, for specific article markup invisible to readers -- but this would require a major software upgrade). If you are feeling ornery about this (as I often am) please see this Wikiproject, which exists only to add tags. I complained on the talk page, received a lot of backup from other people, but the project organisers are blithely going ahead with their taggus pestis distribution. I don't know what to do but am open to ideas. (Have a look at what we wrote on that talk page.) Posting on VPP was probably a good idea. All the best, Antandrus (talk) 00:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Warrants and Debt Instruments, the difference
[edit]The distinction you are making bears on the question of whether a warrant is negotiable or not. Some warrants are negotiable and some are not. If they are negotiable, then they are debt instruments with an obligation to pay any holder in due course such as the bank that presents them for redemption at the treasurer's office. Registered Warrants are debt instruments and negotiable. But if regular warrants are drawn against "available funds" or "to be paid out of fund 0027" that has insufficient money, then they are not debt instruments. I changed the Warrants article to make this clear. The county warrants in Washington State that I processed said "pay from available funds" which made them conditional on available funds and hence not negotiable and therefore not strictly county debt. But that was a distinction without a difference, because the collecting bank accepted them, and the county always paid. If warrants were issued by a water district that had insufficient funds, one of the other county funds would lend the water district just enough money to cover the warrants and the lending fund charged interest on the loan to the water fund. I wrote the program that calculated the interest and generated DR and CR transactions to pay the interest.
The Registered Warrants issued by California say "The treasurer of the state will pay out of the fund 0027 Tax Relief & Refund Acc", which suggests that they may not be negotiable. But the warrants also say "Payable in such coin or currency of the U.S.A. as at the time of payment is legal tender for payment of public & private debts." So are they debt instruments or not? That was settled by the Securities & Exchange Commission which said they are municipal debt. Greensburger (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the SEC press release, First National Bank, and Raton Waterworks citations. I added them to the article as you suggested. Could you supply web addresses for 174 US 360 and First National? Raton must have been a Municipality and not a state or federal government. Do you know of a similar citation that would apply municipal case law to a state?
In the First National case, what was the municipality? There is no Cook County in Nebraska. Or does "Neb." not mean Nebraska?
I don't understand: "...case law regarding holder's remedy is State of Minnesota v Clark, 116 Minn 500. A writ of mandamus is necessary..." There is no Clark County in Minnesota. Was Clark an official who ordered the warrants issued or a disbursements officer or what? What was the court's judgment and for whom? Are you saying that a writ of mandamus would have been necessary, but the court did not grant one? Greensburger (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
September 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Gondor, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Gondor/Gondar
[edit]Hi -- I edited Gondor to remove the statement speculating that Gondor may have derived from Gondar, because the page cited in the reference does not discuss that at all. I could not find "Gondar" anywhere in HME. Could you perhaps re-check your source? -- Elphion (talk) 04:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Found what you may have been thinking of: Letters, Number 324, p. 409. But the gist of that letter seems to be that any such influence is unlikely. -- Elphion (talk) 04:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Piston ring illustrated.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Piston ring illustrated.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Horizontal steam engine.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Horizontal steam engine.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Helocentrism origin.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Helocentrism origin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Helocentrism origin.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Helocentrism origin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impeachment in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Charles I. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chronology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julian Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eusebius Chronicon example.png
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Eusebius Chronicon example.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
- state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
- add the relevant copyright tag.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Signature
[edit] Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Doc James
[edit]Hello,
Doc James is not unidentified and is not British. He is James Heilman, he is from Saskatchewan, and he is an emergency room physician in Vancouver. He is probably the most experienced and respected Wikipedia editor working on medical topics. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, John Chamberlain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, John Chamberlain. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
November 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Personal life of Cicero, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)