Jump to content

User talk:Johannes003/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Enthiran Critical Reception

Why did you delete reviewgang score? WP:MOSFILM clearly says "review aggregate websites such as Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic are citable for statistics pertaining to the ratio of positive to negative reviews". Check the wiki page of any hollywood movie and the opening sentence in critical response will be the rottentomatoes and metacritic score.Reviewgang is the only such service for indian movies which aggregates professional critic reviews Mallumax (talk) 01:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


Johannes003, I thought that review aggregation sites like Claps and Boos or ReviewGang are not permissible till they are accredited by Google News or some other syndicate? I see that different rules are being applied to different sites? Is it dependent on whom we know and whom we don't know? If ReviewGang's "Professional reviews" are allowed, then that would be the day that the neutrality of Wikipedia (Tamil Cinema) will be surely questioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthiksriram (talk • contribs) 13:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blaaze.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Blaaze.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award (Tamil)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award (Tamil), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Filmfare Lifetime Achievement Award (Telugu). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Baana.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Baana.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Naan Avanillai II

I have nominated Naan Avanillai II, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naan Avanillai II. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Chzz  ►  08:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Names

Porkkaalam is the correct anglicized spelling. It always varies for example: Aegan and Egan, or Jayam or Jeyam Universal Hero (talk) 22:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Shriya Saran wiki

hey bro i am really sorry dude.... i have undo your work on shriya's wiki but i have saved it on my ms word... i just undo it for a time being...soon i will add more information on that...so please bro don't do anything on it ..i will promise you that i won't let u down.. and improve shriya's page...please believe me...(Pravinraj (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC))

Thanks

Thanks dudand don't worry i'll make you happy went you back from few days!!:D(Pravinraj (talk) 19:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sarvam 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sarvam 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Vallavan ~ Front.png)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vallavan ~ Front.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

YSR

[1] As per this, it come sout of YSR's mouth. But it looks unreliable. Some other sources, claim that both of them had done it.

But if you have seen the Kannada film and insist there are no changes in the soundtrack, go ahead and remove it :)

Universal Hero (talk) 09:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Add in Thotti Jaya too, YSR composed Gopika's opening song in the film and was thankeds on the title card. Universal Hero (talk) 10:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kannamoochi yenada.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kannamoochi yenada.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:47, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks dude.

It's really great to see an intelligent editor like you being helpful in the long-run. Usually guys come and go, but you've easily been the most cool headed and able guy to carry forward the legacy. Keep on going, it's actually decently fun switching through these archives. Universal Hero (talk) 15:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Karthika Adaikalam

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Karthika Adaikalam. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Striker.

Hi, Siddharth, on his verified Twitter page, confirmed the news. The film features many music directors, doing one song each (Vishal Bharadwaj, Amit Trivedi, Blaaze, Yuvan Shankar Raja, Swanand Kirkire, Shailendra Bharve). Furthermore, he added that Yuvan sang his number in the song in Hindi. Trailers for the film are out with 3 Idiots on Christmas Day, with the music following January 8, 2010. The film should release on February 5, 2010.

Universal Hero (talk) 20:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Goa.

Hi, thanks for all your hard work so far working with the article, Goa. But, I was wondering if it really needed a separate soundtrack page. The film isn't as colossal as the other film soundtrack pages notably Roja, Jeans, Sivaji and Dasavathaaram and honestly I fear it may start a wrong trend of un notable albums being added - especially by editors who are insistent to do such articles for every minute detail of their favourite hero's new film.

Films with such musical anticipation such as Vinnaithaandi Varuvaaya (soundtrack) or albums for Endhiran or Raavan are acceptable due their novelty in concept, for example VTV's recent London launch.

Your thoughts? Universal Hero (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Erm okay, yeah, you do that. :) Universal Hero (talk)

AfD nomination of Ullam

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ullam. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ullam. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Aasal

Brother dont delete Anything from the Aasal Article. It all Wikipedian Article. Confirmed by Adminstrator User:Amalthea. So dont delete anything. Thala Pola Varuma (talk) 14:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Box office

It's better to leave opening grosses as overall grosses become untrackable when they fall out of the Top 10. Furthermore such links do expire on a weekly basis, see how the box office link on here: (titled Pongal Bonanza) leads to this weeks rankings.

Universal Hero (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

SHRIYA SARAN'S Filmography

hey bro i know that the film marmayogi had shelved for a time but its already noted there as DELAYED. its descibe that the movie is being shelve for a time so i'm hoping that you will never delete marmayogi in shriya saran's filmography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pravinraj (talk • contribs) 08:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Vinnaithaandi varuvaaya

Hi Johannes. I saw that you had removed my edits. I had provided some links to reviews in Sify, Rediff - which are both the most reliable critic review websites as of now - behindwoods and Indiaglitz themselves promote movies and so are biased and Claps and Boos, which is the only user score aggregation website. Kindly elaborate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karthiksriram (talk • contribs) 17:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


Johannes003, Can I have a reason as to why a new website cannot be included in the ratings/reviews? The website has a coherent about us to talk about how the rating are done. And may I know why Wikipedia does not like user aggregated sites? I have seen english movies having ratings from Rotten Tomatoes (where the normal audience far outnumber professional reviewers). And if not for audience response, what else would you want to know about a movie's fate at the turnstiles? I know that you are a senior editor, but based on some talk in other pages, I see that there is a network here, where any views that are not acceptable to the network is deleted/edited. I know you would have, but have you gone through the Good Faith Policy of Wikipedia? I can provide to you the user statistics - in terms of geography and in terms of unique visitors for Sify, Rediff or Claps and Boos. Kindly explain what you would expect before you agree that Claps and Boos is an 'acceptable' link for you? I'm surprised because sites which promotes movies like Behindwoods and Indiaglitz are having their reviews linked in many articles, but Claps and Boos is not attached to any monetary entities is being blocked?!Karthik Sriram (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC) Karthik Sriram (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


Also, apart from Baradwaj Rangan who got a National Award from Govt of India, how do you the know the reviewer in Rediff or Sify or BEHINDWOODS is 'credible'? For one, I have written a review for Sify Movies once. And Behindwoods, which seems to be so dear to many articles is basically based on rumors and user articles. You can quite easily verify my facts by going to behindwoods and checking out the veracity of certain articles which have been refuted by the people concerned with the movies. Eg.: http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/feb-10-04/jiiva-ko-24-02-10.html. I have personal access to Jiiva and I know that this was a false news. So I do not see a credible reason for you to accept links from sites like this which publish articles just to get hits and Claps And Boos who do not publish just for sake of hits.

If you can agree, yes, that you have personal motives behind your editing policies, then please let me know. We can go for a Wikipedia arbitration process. Karthik Sriram (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Who are the admins? I'm kinda new to Wikipedia and so would need some help on that. But definitely, I know the folks who run Claps and Boos and they are not a fan site. Every website is only as reliable as what they claim to be. If your consideration for determining validity is exclusive content, then we do have some and you can check them out. If you expect reliable info, then Behindwoods should be the last site. I can prove to you on an article to article basis as to how they have been publishing fake news. But, again, kindly let me know how i can get in touch with the moderators. Karthik Sriram (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Their have already confirm that vijay is going to have a new movie with the name thalapathi . starring viijay and asin , directed by M. Raja . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simy2j (talk • contribs) 11:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Vijay

Their have already confirm that vijay is going to have a new movie with the name thalapathi . starring viijay and asin , directed by M. Raja . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simy2j (talk • contribs) 11:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Vijay

There has been a comfirmation of the movie . i saw in alot of websites . just go to one (www.vijaytheboss.com) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simy2j (talk • contribs) 13:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Vijay

k, if hey hear a comfirmation about the movie i rediff or indiaglitz i will create a page for the movie and i will take my time to create . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simy2j (talk • contribs) 11:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Johannes003,

I would like to know the reason behind you taking out the link to the Touring Talkies page of the movie 'Paiyaa'? This website is a no-ads website that takes a fresh and provides a localized way of rating movies. I see that in many movie pages, Wiki has links from IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes but somehow you did not approve of this website to be in the external links. With all due respect, i would please like to know what is the reason behind this and what i should be doing in order to be legitimate?

Thanks, Jayanth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayanthvenkat (talk • contribs) 18:31, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Favour

Hi,

I've been trying to get some of the better articles in regard to Tamil cinema to a GA level. And as the process is under way, I was wondering if you could quickly read through the prose of Aayirathil Oruvan, and make any adjustments. It was written by a (surprsingly decent) IP address editor.

Moroever, a film article you heavily contributed to (Sarvam) is also going through the process, please see its talk page for its promotion issues. Cheers Universal Hero (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Your such a legend. Do tell me whenever you need any assistance, and I'll help out where you need. Universal Hero (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi buddy,

Thanks for all the help, editing and looking after articles in regard to the South Indian film industry. Just wanted to leave a note, that I'm unlikely to be as active as I have been in recent time over the next few months - possibly til September. I'll try to help when I can, and as much as possible.

...and maybe I could get to know a bit more about your tastes in regard to films (considering your user page is blank). So, as inspired by two other really nice users, I've kind of created a small coffee break quiz which you could kindly complete. Here goes:

  • 1. Rajinikanth or Kamal Haasan: the better actor/star
  • 2. Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam: Rank them in order
  • 3. Simran or Jyothika: the better actress
  • 4. Vikram, Surya or Madhavan: the better actor
  • 5. Asin or Genelia: the better actress
  • 6. Dhanush or Simbu: the actor with the better future
  • 7. Kajal Aggarwal or Samantha: the actress with the better future
  • 8. The Next Telugu superstar: Ram Charan Teja, Allu Arjun, Rana or Naga Chaitanya
  • 9. The most promising: Karthi, Arya, Simbu, Dhanush or Jeeva
  • 10. The last film you saw that you really liked
  • 11. The last film you saw that you felt was "pure torture"
  • 12. Your all-time favorite performance/film of Kamal Haasan
  • 13. Ajith, Vijay, Vikram, Surya: Rank them in order
  • 14. Asin, Trisha, Shriya, Nayantara, Tamanna: Rank them in order
  • 15. Mani Ratnam, Shankar, Gautham Menon, Selvaraghavan, Bala: Rank them in order

Ajith Kumar

Since user 220.225.218.253 has reverted the Ajith Kumar article several times now, it seems likely that he will continue to do so. With that in mind, you are invited to share your rationale in support of the current version on the talk page of that article. 220.225.218.253 has accused the current version of representing a "doctored version of history". For those not familiar with the article, a brief overview of the differences between the two versions would be helpful, as the two versions are so different that cross-comparison is not as easy as it would usually be. I would be personally inclined to favor the current version, but in the interest of transparency I think a brief discussion of what is at stake would be good to have outside of the edit summaries. AtticusX (talk) 10:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Tamil Nadu awards

These are strange awards that are sometimes done three years at a time. And it is unusual for there to be no central website listing all the winners. I don't find the Dailynews article very convincing, best to continue the discussion on the article talk page. Talk:Tamil_Nadu_State_Film_Award_(Special_Prizes)#1999 Rich Farmbrough, 12:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue front cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Lekha

Hey, I see you added that Lekha appears in Kadhalar Dhinam ages ago. Where about in the film was that? Universal Hero (talk) 11:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll remove it then for the time being. :) Universal Hero (talk) 13:01, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Kaaval

Hello Johannes Who are you to delete this page. The film is slated to star in November. It's officially confirmed. Verry sorry i'am removing this. you can't add this without proper discussion. பென்ஞமின் (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

2007 Top Tamil Films Chart

Check this out - http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-slide-shows/movie-1/top-collection/intro.html

Pokiri is behind Paruthiveeran. Also it was clearly noted that Billa was already No.3 within two weeks after release. By the end of its run, Billa had moved up to No.2.

Susi Ganesan's Thiruttu Payale enjoyed an extraordinary run for a low-budget film. But his Kandasamy did not. This was confirmed in India Today. I will give the scan link later.

Vinnaithaandi Varuvaya was at No.1 for five weeks (sify.com). Its distributors share was over 15 crore, so its raw gross was over 30 crore.

Paiya was at No.1 for four weeks and grossed 20 crores.

Singam was at No.1 for three weeks. Its gross is certainly less than Vinnaithaandi Varuvaya and Paiya.

CuteRobin (talk) 10:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Vaanam.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Vaanam.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 09:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kalavani movie poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kalavani movie poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 09:35, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Fraudulent licence tags

I checked your upload history. You were quite busy uploading high-resolution images of films with fraudulent licence claims. Delete them immediately.Anwar (talk) 09:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, why are you tagging high resolution images as low resolution?Anwar (talk) 09:54, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -Tommy! [message] 09:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Boss-Engira-Bhaskaran.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Boss-Engira-Bhaskaran.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anwar (talk) 09:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Goa front cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Goa front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 18:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naan Mahaan Alla poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naan Mahaan Alla poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 18:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TVP poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TVP poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rodhullandemu 18:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

hello

What is the problem for numbering the film list?

You have no rights to say anyone to count or don't count.

Just use your blunt brain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.193.181 (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naan Mahaan Alla poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naan Mahaan Alla poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

About "Successful movies in kollywood"page

Hey i just created that page in order to show all the successful movies of each year. Previously the List of highest-grossing Tamil-language films page was like this only until for the mid of the year 2009.

check this link --- "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Tamil-language_films&oldid=284790414"

Then on april 14,2009 User:Anwar saadat has changed the pattern

check this link --- "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_Tamil-language_films&oldid=284811723"

It was more useful for the viewers to know detailed data on top grossing movies in each year. That's why i tried to recreate the page in that format.

There are lot of differences between the List of highest-grossing Tamil-language films page and the page which i created. so i think it wont be redundant if i create the page.

please reply me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geocraze (talk • contribs) 02:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok then its fine. I wil add those details as best films in each year.thanks for ur reply.User talk:Geocraze (talk • contribs) 02:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Valiban

Hi Jonannes, i would like your opinion on prodding Valiban (is this the same film originally titled as Kettavan?). I believe it is still in development hell and won't begin filming anytime soon. What do you think?--Sodabottle (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naan mahan alla album.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naan mahan alla album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johannes003/Archive_1&oldid=1140483378"