User talk:Joey Boeing 777

Aeroflot - Russian Airlines destinations

Hi! I'd like to know why did you reedited this article? I've improved it according to real Aeroflot network as of December, 2008, including Aeroflot's geo-division of its routes, and you converted it into an older version. Why? Thanx, --Dimitree 00:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimitree (talk • contribs)

August 2008

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ryanair Flight 9336. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Please do not keep removing the template as it is still being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryanair Flight 9336 you are welcome to make your comments on that page MilborneOne (talk) 20:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Ryanair Flight 9336, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ryanair. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. 87.74.2.211 (talk) 20:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

87.74.2.211 is on a 3RR warning. He/she has reverted seven times in the past 24 hours and is the only one engaged in an edit war. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation Project

You may be interested in a number of wikipedia projects including Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines and Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports. The projects discuss and agree by consensus what and how information should be presented in their related articles. If you have a problem with the way the information is presented you can bring them up at either project or the general project for all aviation related articles Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation. MilborneOne (talk) 19:30, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in infoboxs

Hello Joey Boeing 777 just a point about your inclusion of flags in airline infoboxes, the project consensus is not to include them, you are welcome to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines.--EZ1234 (talk) 02:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Joey Boeing 777! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! triwbe (talk) 05:56, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion of Dragonfly Executive Air Charter

A tag has been placed on Dragonfly Executive Air Charter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 07:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dragonfly Executive Air Charter

I have nominated Dragonfly Executive Air Charter, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonfly Executive Air Charter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. triwbe (talk) 06:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Air Europa Flight 196

I have nominated Air Europa Flight 196, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Europa Flight 196. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mjroots (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

iraqi airways destinations article

Your article makes no sense at all and has been put up for removal, just because every other airline seems to have a seprate destination page mainly due to their large networks does not mean this is meant for all, especially not those serving a handful of places. Please dont be offended also those tables are strictly prohibited and all articles which such format have been reverted to the regular style.inspector 20:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspector123 (talk • contribs)

Enerjet gap

Hi. Regarding the Enerjet "gap", I understand if the source article wasn't more specific. But the shortcoming in the source article doesn't mean it isn't legitimate to ask for further information in the Wikipedia article. If no one can supply it, so be it, but reducing vagueness is a valid goal.—Largo Plazo (talk) 14:01, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Pages

Hey I saw your comment on the Delta Air Lines talk page. I did reply to it, but I also moved it to the bottom of the page, as that's where new posts go. To make it simple, there is a "New Section" button right next to the edit button on talk pages. This makes it really simple to create a new section and have it placed at the bottom without having to scroll through the previous sections in the edit box.--Pilotboi / talk / contribs 15:41, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Air Dominicana destinations

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Air Dominicana destinations, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Air Dominicana destinations.. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Air Dominicana destinations. a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. – Toon ^(talk) 15:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of accidents and incidents on commercial aircraft

Hello, just a reminder (as I always forget as well!) if you delete an accident from List of accidents and incidents on commercial aircraft can you please add it to Talk:List of accidents and incidents on commercial aircraft/Holding zone. I have already copied in the three you have deleted. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 13:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of BA CityFlyer Flight 8456

An article that you have been involved in editing, BA CityFlyer Flight 8456, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BA CityFlyer Flight 8456. Thank you. AKRadecki^Speaketh 06:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't take this personally, it's just that the incident doesn't rise to our notability criteria as outlined at WP:AIRCRASH. If you have interest in writing about aviation accidents, we have a long list of ones that do need articles that do rise to the notability standard. AKRadecki^Speaketh 06:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TUIfly.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TUIfly.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enerjet Logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enerjet Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transavia Airlines Flight 462 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transavia Airlines Flight 462 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transavia Airlines Flight 462 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. William 16:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Aeroflot destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Aeroflot destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Aeroflot destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sunnya343 (talk) 17:38, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Lion Air Group destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Lion Air Group destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lion Air Group destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 11:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]