User talk:Joeluwa

Welcome!

Hello, Joeluwa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Joeluwa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which article are you talking about? Joeluwa (talk) 10:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joeluwa. You used the {{Help me}} template, but you wanted an answer from a specific editor. If you still need help, please add your question to that editor's talk page instead. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance.

Joeluwa (talk) 10:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Ayush Dutta, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sir, sure. Joeluwa (talk) 12:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Joeluwa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 09:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I have not linked any other websites in Draft:Ayush Dutta, I was still working on it. Joeluwa (talk) 09:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Before, I was been told that I was spamming, because of making various User pages. But now, I was blamed for making promotion or advertisement? I have not advertised, and I was working on that article. And after an hour I saw an edit there, that your account is indefinitely blocked from editing, but for what? I was advertising, but no. I was not advertising , not promoting anyone. Because, A knowledge panel in Google needs Wikipedia page to linked in . If I will be indefinitely blocked, I will not be able to finish the work, i.e., to make a knowledge graph. So, I hope that you would unblock my account. If you think I was making advertisement ot promotion, then please you may inform me which of the part you felt as a promotion or advertisement.

Decline reason:

To give but a single example of promotional language, your now deleted draft includes the line "He is very passionate and hard-working" without providing any reliable secondary sources specifically using such non-neutral language. You also say you were making the article for the purpose of getting a knowledge graph on google - again a promotional aim. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 09:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, sir. But I have not tried to advertise anything. I writing but collecting information and surfing Wikipedia. So, that It would work good. So, I think I must be unblocked. Joeluwa (talk) 09:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Before, I was been told that I was spamming, because of making various User pages. But now, I was blamed for making promotion or advertisement? I have not advertised, and I was working on that article. And after an hour I saw an edit there, that your account is indefinitely blocked from editing, but for what? I was advertising, but no. I was not advertising , not promoting anyone. Because, A knowledge panel in Google needs Wikipedia page to linked in . If I will be indefinitely blocked, I will not be able to finish the work, i.e., to make a knowledge graph. So, I hope that you would unblock my account. If you think I was making advertisement ot promotion, then please you may inform me which of the part you felt as a promotion or advertisement. Joeluwa (talk) 10:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Before, I was been told that I was spamming, because of making various User pages. But now, I was blamed for making promotion or advertisement? I have not advertised, and I was working on that article. And after an hour I saw an edit there, that your account is indefinitely blocked from editing, but for what? I was advertising, but no. I was not advertising , not promoting anyone. Because, A knowledge panel in Google needs Wikipedia page to linked in . If I will be indefinitely blocked, I will not be able to finish the work, i.e., to make a knowledge graph. So, I hope that you would unblock my account. If you think I was making advertisement ot promotion, then please you may inform me which of the part you felt as a promotion or advertisement.

Decline reason:

To give but a single example of promotional language, your now deleted draft includes the line "He is very passionate and hard-working" without providing any reliable secondary sources specifically using such non-neutral language. You also say you were making the article for the purpose of getting a knowledge graph on google - again a promotional aim. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ohh, now I see, okay, sorry, sir. I will not write such words, and was the other part of the article correct? Please unblock me, I was going to finish the work, please help me writing articles, please inform me which type of sentences of that article was wrong,and please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new, I am just learning Wikipedia. Please unblock me. I will write the article again by removing that words.. Okay, sure, I will provide only one unblock request at a time. But, please unblock me. Joeluwa (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not adequately address your promotional editing or tell us what you will edit about as you won't be unblocked to edit about the topics you edited about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, thanks for explaining everything and the things I have done wrong the recent article, "Ayush Dutta".Sir, I realised that the words 'He is passionate and hard-working' was promotional. So, I will not use them in editing. I will take a look at other articles too to get a reference. I didn't knew that the words above were promotional. Please, unblock me. And, sir please don't think that I am a Spammer or a bot or a advertiser. I am just an ordinary person. It was a mistake. I will scrutinize the whole article and rewrite it.I am not a Wikipedian for months, I didn't knew that in my first article, i.e., "Ayush Dutta", I used promotional words i.e., "He is passionate and hardworking". I didn't intentionally wanted to do it. I was informed by admins, that I used promotional words,i.e., "He is passionate and hardworking". I don't want to lose my Wikipedia account. I am not an advertiser, or a spammer, I am an ordinary person. I want to be unblocked and rewrite the article "Ayush Dutta", and scrutinize it, and I will surely remove the promotional part i.e., "He is passionate and hardworking", and others. I will work carefully this time. Please unblock me. I also know that every admins are now angry to me, but I am still eagerly waiting for someone or admin to unblock me.

Decline reason:

There's no reason to unblock you if you're only here to write about a subject that clearly fails our WP:BIO notability guidelines. Wikipedia is not a promotional platform. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeluwa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, sir, but I was really not trying to advertise or promote the person "Ayush Dutta", I wrote without scrutinizing the raw data that I got, I want to rewrite the article with more concern. Please accept this request.

Decline reason:

No. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 03:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not going to be unblocked if you're only here to create that article, period. I've revoked your talk page access per WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #55347

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #60814

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]