User talk:Joel on the SOL

You are now in violation of Wikipedia's 3 revert rule on the Talk:Civil partnerships in the United Kingdom page. Jeffpw 19:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reconsider

Please reconsider what you are saying to others. I am NOT an administrator, but if I have my way, you will be temporarily blocked, if you use your blunt use of terminology, again. I have found that you have been hipocritical in some cases. One instince, you added to Dev920's talk page that she was using bad terminology, she may have for all I know, but what I do know is that though she may have done it, it does not give you the right to, though you did it anyways, you are setting a very bad example for the new users. Please stop doing so. --Zazzer

Civility

Joel, please review Wikipedia's policies on no personal attacks and civility. You need to refrain from labelling content edits as "bad faith," from referring to other users' edits as "disgraceful" or as "disgusting behavior," or from insulting other users' knowledge of Wikipedia rules. If you have a dispute regarding the rating of Civil partnerships in the United Kingdom page, then discuss the rating itself, not the users with whom you are discussing the matter. Also, please note Jeffpw's warning above that you are in violation of the three-revert rule. If you continue to violate Wikipedia policies, you may be blocked, particularly if you violate the three-revert rule again. Let me know if you have any questions. | Mr. Darcy talk 21:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Please review Wikipedia's rules on sockpuppetry, as it appears you are editing both under your username and under an anonymous IP address to evade the 3RR rule and to sway a talk-page discussion. Use of sockpuppets may lead to a block. Again, please let me know if you have any questions - and please limit your editing to one ID. | Mr. Darcy talk 23:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civil partnerships in the United Kingdom

Hi Joel on the SOL. Good work on the Civil Partnerships article. I know Dev920 has expressed herself in rather strong terms but don't feel dishearted. The article probably isn't yet ready for a GA nomination but I feel it soon can be. I'm not sure about the criticim of lack of references as the sections of the Act are referred to throughout but have made some suggestions about content that could be added to the article to improve it. I hope we can all work together to improve the article... -WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 01:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Civil partnerships in the United Kingdom.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 04:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC).

Tom lad...

Tom -

I know you've had to put up with some real nonsense on here lately (me too!) but please do reconsider telling them to stuff it. The CP article wouldn't be 1/4 as good as it is without your input.

Anyhow, catch you soon and, in the meantime, I have a user name now - kinda sarcy but it makes the point!

Be good. Chris NoStringsAttached 11:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:C553da21.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:C553da21.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 14:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Slrunning.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Slrunning.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 15:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]