User talk:Joecarmel

March 2014

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Template:USStat/sandbox, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:X8

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Hatnotes

I reverted some of your edits, and I want to tell you directly why I did it so we can discuss it if you disagree. You added "See also…" as a Hatnote on several articles that lists Acts of Congress. I think that hatnotes are useful if readers need an explanation as to why they're on that article or perhaps to direct them to the correct article they were looking for. However, if you want readers to go to the "next" or "previous" article in a series, it's best not to clutter up the hatntoes and just leave it in a "See also" section lower in the page. What do you think? (No problem. I was simply reusing the hatnote that was on one of the pages because I thought it was a good idea. Being in the "See also" section is fine. I'd like to keep going using http://legisworks.org/sal/saldir.html - the text of the TOCs are available back to 1891 (59th Congress). Having consistency would be good. Joecarmel (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)) (reply here.) —GoldRingChip 01:27, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Acts of the 107th United States Congress

added links pointing to Department of Energy, Forest Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of the Interior, Treasury Department, Veterans Affairs, National Housing Act and Export-Import Bank

List of Acts of the 114th United States Congress

added a link pointing to Boys Town

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Acts of the 106th United States Congress, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hamilton, New Jersey, Patent and Trademark Office and National Housing Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acts of Congress

Hey, nice work on all the acts of Congress pages! Question: do you generate these by hand, or does some sort of bot or script help you out? I ask because I'm engaged in doing one for the 104th Congress, and it is quite laborious... Neutrality^talk 19:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much. Yes, I'm using a Perl script that generates the starter text for each Congress. Seeing the errors and corrections you and others have made has been enlightening and I need to find and correct the problems for the pre-105th Congresses. I'd also like to reuse what's been done for links. Joecarmel (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, fantastic, that makes total sense. If you want to generate a starter text for the 104th Congress, I have about a third of the content complete at User:Neutrality/I (a draft page in userspace). Neutrality^talk 13:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of acts of the 114th United States Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of acts of the 114th United States Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Navajo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of acts of the 114th United States Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immigration and Nationality Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of acts of the 114th United States Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Corps of Engineers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the low volume vehicle manufacturing act

How can I verify if this act has been cited in public law? I'd like to update the Low Volume Vehicles Manufacturers page but it's not clear if this is now in public law. Thanks. Expandinglight5 (talk) 05:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to http://www.powerperformancenews.com/news/headlines/replica-car-manufacturers-customers-and-suppliers-praise-new-law/ at Low Volume Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Act of 2015 references section 24405 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act which is Pub. L. 114–94 (text) (PDF). Unfortunately, the legislation didn't include "may be cited as the Low Volume Vehicles Manufacturers Act of 2015" in the final act and therefore is not included as a separately named citable law at the List of acts of the 114th United States Congress. Joecarmel (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Joecarmel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Joecarmel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Joecarmel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 00:12, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]