User talk:Joe1w

Joe1w, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Joe1w! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on John Kasich, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at John Kasich. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:32, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. CatcherStorm ^talk 12:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Above: "You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content". There was a next time, so now you're blocked.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Hoary (talk) 04:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Advisement

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 06:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Beightler

The article Stephen Beightler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lots of primary sources, no claim to lasting notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Quique Sinesi

Hi, I'm Mabalu. Joe1w, thanks for creating Quique Sinesi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nice start, looks like a good breadth of international sources already to show notability, please do consider expanding the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mabalu (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of Arbitration Enforcement Request

Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Joe1w. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]