User talk:JoaquinFerrero

De-categorization

Please stop de-categorizing prgramming language articles, presumably because they're also in the stubs category and you've misunderstood the implications of WP:OVERCAT about avoiding placing articles into transitive categories, i.e. parent categories as well as sub categories. This is a reasonable general principle, widely mis-applied across WP though, and it certainly doesn't apply to stub categories. If it were applied to stub categories, we'd never achieve any proper categorization! Andy Dingley (talk) 22:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ET video game

The time limit sentences are unsourced, and everything I've read (and seen) says it's not an actual time limit. Can you explain why you re-added that material without a source? JimKaatFan (talk) 01:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I found more. While there is no overall time limit, there is that time limit after the phone is assembled. I included two new sources and edited the text to accurately reflect those sources. However, there's still no source for the "adversity" original research, so I think that should stay out. JimKaatFan (talk) 01:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reference is maybe in one article of Howard Scott Warshaw for the GamesTM magazine, section "Core Memory" (Reference #18 in the ET page), but I not found these articles at archives.org (they only have 50 issues archived, maybe we need to wait a few months). Meanwhile, the original text on adversity is in https://infogalactic.com/info/E.T._the_Extra-Terrestrial_(video_game) JoaquinFerrero (talk) 11:13, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so there's no reliable source on that available, got it. JimKaatFan (talk) 17:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I re-read the Warshaw interview (Reference #18 in the ET page) - it doesn't mention him adding more adversity, and doesn't mention a time limit anywhere. Are you sure you're talking about that reference? I don't even know why it's called "Core Memory". That phrase does not appear anywhere in that page that's referenced. JimKaatFan (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "Core Memory" linked at reference #19 is wrong. "Core Memory" is an articles series written by Warshaw in GamesTM magazine. Please search by Howard Scott Warshaw in this page: https://magazinesfromthepast.fandom.com/wiki/Games%E2%84%A2_Issue_111 So... the suspicion is that the adversity comment is Scott's in one of these articles, but we don't know what it is. According to Google, Scott wrote at numbers 71, 86, 111 and 114. But they're not available anywhere we can check, so if we remove it, we may have to put it back in the future when that information is available. On the subject of the time limit, the instruction manual says so at the end of page 4: in the special area of "call the ship", the time counter appears. If the player is not in the landing zone when the counter ends, ET is not rescued. JoaquinFerrero (talk) 21:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I added the time limit bit back in. With a reference that uses the manual as a source.

As for "Core Memory" - first you said it was reference #18, so I fixed that one. But the URL you're giving me does not even mention the ET video game, and only mentions Warshaw as writing a column in some magazine. Additionally, it's not a reliable source - it's just a fan wiki. As far as I can tell, that's a useless reference. I plan to go through the other sentences that are using that as a reference, and if I can't find an alternate source, I'm going to delete the material. JimKaatFan (talk) 01:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Atari VCS (upcoming console). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Moving this page when you had already been advised on the inappropriateness of such, and had your talk page comments opposed, is disruptive. Do not do again. -- ferret (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]