User talk:Jnestorius/2017

Irish revolution

Hello. You redirected the page "Irish revolution" in 2012 from List of Irish uprisings to Irish revolutionary period, and it's been like that for five years. May you please explain why? I won't ask for bold revert or anything like that. I am just curious. --George Ho (talk) 05:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:PRIMARYTOPIC. I ought to have included my reasoning in the edit summary; belated apologies that I didn't. See Google Books "Irish revolution". The 2010 discussion predates my 2012 creation of the Irish revolutionary period article. jnestorius^(talk) 19:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... got it. Thanks. BTW, I trimmed down search results with exact matches. I guess you're right. George Ho (talk) 01:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bills (government debt) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Bills (government debt), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fan POV Tag from 10 April 2017

Hello Inestorius, I am working since days to bring the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_(1986_TV_series) up to a good and neutral standard. It is not me who created that page. As you can see from the earlier History, the page has now true informations and new sections. I will delete all the text concerning the 60 episodes, which have more or less been copied from a Website! I have studied many pages in the last week and no one supplies such spoilers on a page concerning a television series. My question to you, would you be so kind and please remove the tag on top of the page? Once the long section with the spoilers is gone, I believe the problem is solved. I will try to my best of abilities add some photos which are in my personal possession and which would enrich the articles there. Looking forward to your hopefully positive answer. Laramie1960 Laramie1960 (talk) 11:26, 21 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laramie1960 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It's especially problematic that you would add this kind of detailed information to an article that has already been tagged long-term for needing references. DonIago (talk) 13:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:BURDEN. If you wish to reinstate this material, please add appropriate citations. DonIago (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pig in a poke#Ambiguous sentence

You have helped me a lot, thanks :-)
PS. See the end of the talk.
PS2. I can help you with Polish - my mother tongue :-)
85.193.242.133 (talk) 04:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Green Street Courthouse/Republican

Hello, Jnestorius. You have new messages at Ira Leviton's talk page.
Message added 00:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

2,4,6 row barley

Wouldn't just deleting these 2,4,6 row barley redirects be best? Nothing links/should link to them, typically 1 hits per month (I haven't checked them all) suggest they're a waste of effort. Batternut (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree that nothing should link to two-row barley or six-row barley, and indeed there are already a few links, and might be more. If you want to delete some of the others, them raise them at WP:RFD. Superfluous redirects are not something I worry about. jnestorius^(talk) 13:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I agree that two-row barley and six-row barley could be useful, its the Two-row, Six-row, Six row, Four-row, Four row, 4row, 6row, 2row links that seem silly. I might RfD them one day. Thanks for your opinion! Batternut (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Council Bill rv edit

[Moved to Talk:Irish Council Bill#Civil service jnestorius^(talk) 10:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)][reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jnestorius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Facebook Error Dialog.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Facebook Error Dialog.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]